Evaluation of risk factors for complications after bariatric surgery.

The decision to perform a bariatric surgical procedure, the conclusion of a clinical pathway in which management is individually adapted to each patient, is taken after multidisciplinary consultation. Paradoxically, the patients who would most benefit from surgery are also those who have the highest operative risk. In practice, predictive factors of mortality and severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo>III) must be used to evaluate the benefit/risk ratio most objectively. The main risk factors are age, male gender, body mass index, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, insulin resistance and diabetes, tobacco abuse, cardiovascular disease, ability to lose weight before surgery, hypoalbuminemia and functional disability. Routine preoperative evaluation of high perioperative risk patients provides the attending physician with information to: (1) correct several of these risk factors before surgery and thereby limit the operative risk; (2) orient the patient to a less risky surgical procedure and/or to a facility with a more adapted technical capacity, as necessary; (3) contra-indicate the operation if the risks exceed the expected benefits. All in all, this preoperative evaluation combined with management of comorbidities contributes to decrease the risk of postoperative complications and to improve the overall management of obese patients.

Risk Factors for Postoperative Morbidity After Totally Robotic Gastric Bypass in 302 Consecutive Patients.

BACKGROUND: Totally robotic gastric bypass (robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, R-RYGBP) has been adopted in some centers on the basis of large retrospective studies. In view of some data showing higher morbidity and higher costs, some authors have considered that robotic gastric bypass may no longer be justified with the existing system. Although low postoperative complication rates after R-RYGBP have been reported, risk factors for postoperative morbidity have never been evaluated. The goal of this study was to identify risk factors for postoperative morbidity after R-RYGBP. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed and included 302 consecutive patients after R-RYGBP performed between 2007 and 2013. This subset of patients represented 34 % of all gastric bypass procedures performed during this study period. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed in order to identify risk factors for postoperative overall morbidity (Clavien scores 1-4 versus 0) and major morbidity (Clavien score ≥3 versus 0-1-2). RESULTS: Postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were 24.4 and 0.6 %, respectively. In multivariate analysis, independent risk factors for overall morbidity were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥3 (odds ratio (OR) 2.0) and previous bariatric surgery (revisional gastric bypass) (OR 2.0). Independent risk factors for major morbidity (Clavien ≥3) were previous bariatric surgery (revisional gastric bypass) (OR 3.7), low preoperative hematocrit level (OR 0.9), and revisional gastric bypass procedure with concomitant gastric banding removal (OR 5.7). CONCLUSIONS: R-RYGBP is prone to increased complications in the setting of a high preoperative ASA score and revisional surgery. This should be taken into consideration by clinicians when evaluating R-RYGBP.

Medical follow up after bariatric surgery: nutritional and drug issues. General recommendations for the prevention and treatment of nutritional deficiencies.

This review is an update of the long-term follow-up of nutritional and metabolic issues following bariatric surgery, and also discusses the most recent guidelines for the three most common procedures: adjustable gastric bands (AGB); sleeve gastrectomy (SG); and roux-en-Y gastric bypass (GBP). The risk of nutritional deficiencies depends on the percentage of weight loss and the type of surgical procedure performed. Purely restrictive procedures (AGB, SG), for example, can induce digestive symptoms, food intolerance or maladaptative eating behaviours due to pre- or postsurgical eating disorders. GBP also has a minor malabsorptive component. Iron deficiency is common with the three types of bariatric surgery, especially in menstruating women, and GBP is also associated with an increased risk of calcium, vitamin D and vitamin B12 deficiencies. Rare deficiencies can lead to serious complications such as encephalopathy or protein-energy malnutrition. Long-term problems such as changes in bone metabolism or neurological complications need to be carefully monitored. In addition, routine nutritional screening, recommendations for appropriate supplements and monitoring compliance are imperative, whatever the bariatric procedure. Key points are: (1) virtually routine mineral and multivitamin supplementation; (2) prevention of gallstone formation with the use of ursodeoxycholic acid during the first 6 months; and (3) regular, life-long, follow-up of all patients. Pre- and postoperative therapeutic patient education (TPE) programmes, involving a new multidisciplinary approach based on patient-centred education, may be useful for increasing patients'long-term compliance, which is often poor. The role of the general practitioner has also to be emphasized: clinical visits and follow-ups should be monitored and coordinated with the bariatric team, including the surgeon, the obesity specialist, the dietitian and mental health professionals.