Two-center analysis of cannabis on venous thromboembolism risk after traumatic injury: A matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Conflicting evidence exists evaluating associations between cannabis (THC) and post-traumatic DVT. METHODS: Retrospective analysis (2014-2023) of patients ≥15yrs from two Level I trauma centers with robust VTE surveillance and prophylaxis protocols. Multivariable hierarchical regression assessed the association between THC and DVT risk. THC â€‹+ â€‹patients were direct matched to other drug use categories on VTE risk markers and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: Of 7365 patients, 3719 were drug-, 575 were THC â€‹+ â€‹only, 2583 were other drug+, and 488 were TCH+/other drug+. DVT rates by exposure group did not differ. TCH â€‹+ â€‹only patients had higher GCS scores, shorter hospital length of stay, and the lowest pelvic fracture and mortality rates. A total of 458 drug-, 453 other drug+, and 232 THC+/other drug â€‹+ â€‹patients were matched to 458, 453, and 232 THC â€‹+ â€‹only patients. There were no differences in DVT event rates in any paired sub-cohort set. Additionally, iteratively adjusted paired models did not show an association between THC and DVT. CONCLUSIONS: THC does not appear to be associated with increased DVT risk in patients with strict trauma chemoprophylaxis. Toxicology testing is useful for identifying substance abuse intervention opportunities, but not for DVT risk stratification in THC â€‹+ â€‹patients.

Lessons for the next pandemic: analysis of the timing and outcomes including post-discharge decannulation rates for tracheostomy in severe COVID-19 respiratory failure.

PURPOSE: COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure frequently require prolonged ventilatory support that would typically warrant early tracheostomy. There has been significant debate on timing, outcomes, and safety of these procedures. The purpose of this study was to determine the epidemiological, hospital, and post-discharge outcomes of this cohort, based on early (ET) versus late (LT) tracheostomy. METHODS: Retrospective review (March 2020-January 2021) in a 5-hospital system of ventilated patients who underwent tracheostomy. Demographics, hospital/ICU length of stay (LOS), procedural characteristics, APACHE II scores at ICU admission, stabilization markers, and discharge outcomes were analyzed. Long-term decannulation rates were obtained from long-term acute care facility (LTAC) data. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients underwent tracheostomy (mean 61 years, 62% male, 64% Hispanic). Despite ET being frequently performed during active COVID infection (85% vs. 64%), there were no differences in complication types or rates versus LT. APACHE II scores at ICU admission were comparable for both groups; however, > 50% of LT patients met PEEP stability at tracheostomy. ET was associated with significantly shorter ICU and hospital LOS, ventilator days, and higher decannulation rates. Of the cohort discharged to an LTAC, 59% were ultimately decannulated, 36% were discharged home, and 41% were discharged to a skilled nursing facility. CONCLUSIONS: We report the first comprehensive analysis of ET and LT that includes LTAC outcomes and stabilization markers in relation to the tracheostomy. ET was associated with improved clinical outcomes and a short LOS, specifically on days of pre-tracheostomy ventilation and in-hospital decannulation rates.

Modified Brain Injury Guidelines for preinjury anticoagulation in traumatic brain injury: An opportunity to reduce health care resource utilization.

INTRODUCTION: The Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) stratify patients by traumatic brain injury (TBI) severity to provide management recommendations to reduce health care resource burden but mandates that patients on anticoagulation (AC) are allocated to the most severe tertile (BIG 3). We sought to analyze TBI patients on AC therapy using a modified BIG model to determine if this population can offer further opportunity for safe reductions in health care resource utilization. METHODS: Patients 55 years or older on AC with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) from two centers were retrospectively stratified into BIG 1 to 3 risk groups using modified BIG criteria excluding AC as a criterion. Intracranial hemorrhage progression, neurosurgical intervention (NSI), death, and worsened discharge status were compared. RESULTS: A total of 221 patients were included, with 23%, 29%, and 48% classified as BIG 1, BIG 2, and BIG 3, respectively. The BIG 3 cohort had a higher rate of AC reversal agents administered (66%) compared with the BIG 1 (40%) and BIG 2 (54%) cohorts ( p < 0.01), as well as ICH progression discovered on repeat head computed tomography (56% vs. 38% vs. 26%, respectively; p < 0.001). No patients in the BIG 1 and 2 cohorts required NSI. No patients in BIG 1 and 3% of patients in BIG 2 died secondary to the ICH. In the BIG 3 cohort, 16% of patients required NSI and 26% died. Brain Injury Guidelines 3 patients had 15 times the odds of mortality compared with BIG 1 patients ( p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The AC population had higher rates of ICH progression than the BIG literature, but this did not lead to more NSI or mortality in the lower tertiles of our modified BIG protocol. If the modified BIG used the original tertile management on our population, then NS consultation may have been reduced by up to 52%. These modified criteria may be a safe opportunity for further health care resource and cost savings in the TBI population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Fragmentation of care in the blunt abdominal trauma patient: Capturing our true outcomes and impact on care.

BACKGROUND: Trauma care is associated with unplanned readmissions, which may occur at facilities other than the index treatment facility. This "fragmentation of care" may be associated with adverse outcomes. We evaluated a statewide database that includes readmissions to analyze the incidence and impact of FC. METHODS: The California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development patient discharge data set was evaluated for calendar years 2016 to 2018. Patients 15 years or older diagnosed with blunt abdominal solid organ injury during the index admission were identified. Readmissions were evaluated postdischarge at 1, 3, and 6 months. Patients readmitted within 6 months to a facility other than the index admission facility (fragmented care [FC]) were compared with those readmitted to their index admission facility (non-FC). Logistic regression modeling was used to evaluate risk of FC. RESULTS: Of the total 1,580 patients, there were 752 FC (47.6%) and 828 (52.4%) non-FC. Readmissions representing FC at months 1, 3, and 6 were 40.3%, 49.3%, and 53.4%, respectively. At index admission, the groups were demographically and clinically similar, with similar rates of abdominal operations and complications. Non-FC patients had a higher rate of abdominal reoperation at readmission (5.8% non-FC vs. 2.9% FC, p = 0.006). In an adjusted model, multiple readmissions (odds ratio [OR] 1.11, p = 0.014), readmission >30 days after index facility discharge (OR, 1.98; p < 0.001), and discharge to a nonmedical facility (OR, 2.46; p < 0.0001) were associated with increased odds of FC. Operative intervention at index admission was associated with lower odds of FC (OR, 0.77; p = 0.039). However, FC was not independently associated with demographic or insurance characteristics. CONCLUSION: The rate of FC among patients with blunt abdominal injury is high. The risk of FC is mitigated when patients are managed operatively during the index admission. Trauma systems should implement measures to ensure that these patients are followed postdischarge. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and epidemiological, level III; Care management, level IV.

Isolated Intracranial Hemorrhage in Elderly Patients With Pre-Injury Anticoagulation: Is Full Trauma Team Activation Necessary?

BACKGROUND: Traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a highly morbid injury, particularly among elderly patients on preinjury anticoagulants (AC). Many trauma centers initiate full trauma team activation (FTTA) for these high-risk patients. We sought to determine if FTTA was superior compared with those who were evaluated as a trauma consultation (CON). METHODS: Patients aged ≥55 on preinjury AC who presented from January 2015 to December 2019 with blunt isolated head injury (non-head AIS ≤2) and confirmed ICH were identified. CON patients and FTTA patients were matched by age and head AIS. Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess patient and injury characteristics with mortality and survivor discharge disposition. REASULTS: There were 45 CON patients and 45 FTTA patients. Mean age was 80 years in both groups. Fall was the most common mechanism (98% CON vs. 92% FTTA). Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) was lower in FTTA (14 vs. 15, p<0.01). CON had a significantly longer time from arrival to CT scan (1.3 vs. 0.4 hrs, p<0.01). Hospital days were similar (CON: 3.9 vs. FTTA: 3.7 days). However, CON had increased ventilator use (p=0.03). Lower admission GCS was the only factor associated with increased risk of death. Among survivors, only head AIS increased the risk of discharge to a level of care higher than that of preinjury (p=0.01). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in mortality or adverse discharge disposition between FTTA and CON, although FTTA was associated with a more rapid evaluation and diagnosis. Any alteration in GCS was strongly associated with mortality and should prompt evaluation by FTTA.

A tale of two centers: Is low-molecular-weight heparin really superior for prevention of posttraumatic venous thromboembolism?

BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is widely used for venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis following injury. However, unfractionated heparin (UFH) is a less expensive option. We compared LMWH and UFH for prevention of posttraumatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS: Trauma patients 15 years or older with at least one administration of venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis at two level I trauma centers with similar DVT-screening protocols were identified. Center 1 administered UFH every 8 hours for chemoprophylaxis, and center 2 used twice-daily antifactor Xa-adjusted LMWH. Clinical characteristics and primary chemoprophylaxis agent were evaluated in a two-level logistic regression model. Primary outcome was incidence of DVT and PE. RESULTS: There were 3,654 patients: 1,155 at center 1 and 2,499 at center 2. The unadjusted DVT rate at center 1 was lower than at center 2 (3.5% vs. 5.0%; p = 0.04); PE rates did not significantly differ (0.4% vs. 0.6%; p = 0.64). Patients at center 2 were older (mean, 50.3 vs. 47.3 years; p < 0.001) and had higher Injury Severity Scores (median, 10 vs. 9; p < 0.001), longer stays in the hospital (mean, 9.4 vs. 7.0 days; p < 0.001) and intensive care unit (mean, 3.0 vs. 1.3 days; p < 0.001), and a higher mortality rate (1.6% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.02) than patients at center 1. Center 1's patients received their first dose of chemoprophylaxis earlier than patients at center 2 (median, 1.0 vs. 1.7 days; p < 0.001). After risk adjustment and accounting for center effects, primary chemoprophylaxis agent was not associated with risk of DVT (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-1.48; p = 0.949). Cost calculations showed that UFH was less expensive than LMWH. CONCLUSION: Primary utilization of UFH is not inferior to LMWH for posttraumatic DVT chemoprophylaxis and rates of PE are similar. Given that UFH is lower in cost, the choice of this chemoprophylaxis agent may have major economic implications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and epidemiological, level II; Therapeutic, level III.

Revealing the scope of surgical device malfunctions: Analysis of the "hidden" Food and Drug Administration device database.

BACKGROUND: We compared surgical device malfunction reports in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) public Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) with those in the FDA nonpublic Alternative Summary Reporting (ASR). METHODS: General surgery device product code categories in MAUDE and ASR from 1999 to 2018 were identified. Changes in the rates of categories and adverse events were evaluated by Poisson regression. RESULTS: There were 283,308 (72%) general surgical device malfunctions in MAUDE and 109,954 (28%) in ASR. Reports increased annually in ASR versus MAUDE, particularly for surgical staplers and clip devices (p < 0.05). ASR contained approximately 80% of these reports; MAUDE 20%. In MAUDE, 42.9% of surgical device malfunctions and 20.2% of stapler/clip malfunctions resulted in patient injury or death. ASR listed no injury or death information. CONCLUSIONS: ASR contained a significant portion of surgical device malfunctions hidden from public scrutiny. Access to such data is essential to safe surgical care.

The rising tide of methamphetamine use in elderly trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Methamphetamine (METH) is associated with an elevated risk of injury and the outcomes in the elderly remain unclear. We analyzed METH's impact in elderly trauma patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis (2009-2018) of trauma patients at a Level I trauma center. Elderly patients were defined as age ≥55. Substance use was identified by blood alcohol test and urine drug screen. Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess patient and injury characteristics with mortality. RESULTS: Of 15,770 patient encounters with substance use testing, 5278 (34%) were elderly. Elderly METH use quadrupled over time (2%-8%; p < 0.01). Elderly METH + patients were more likely to require surgical intervention (35% vs. 17%), mechanical ventilation (15% vs. 7%), and a longer hospitalization (6.5 vs. 3.6 days) compared with elderly substance negative. Multivariate analysis showed increasing age, ventilator use, and injury severity were associated with mortality (ps < 0.01); METH was not related to mortality. CONCLUSION: Substance use in elderly trauma patients increased significantly. METH use in elderly trauma patients is a risk factor for significantly greater resource utilization.

Nationwide analysis of resuscitative thoracotomy in pediatric trauma: Time to differentiate from adult guidelines?

BACKGROUND: Emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) for pediatric patients is uncommon, and practice patterns have not been evaluated. We examined the indications and outcomes for EDT by trauma center designation using a nationwide database. METHODS: Patients 16 years or younger who underwent EDT within 30 minutes of arrival from 2013 to 2016 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Data Bank. Patient demographic information, indications for EDT, and outcomes were analyzed. Outcomes were compared between centers with and without pediatric trauma center designation. RESULTS: A total of 114 patients were identified for analysis with a mean ± SD age of 10.3 ± 4.7 years. Patients were predominantly male (69%) with a median Injury Severity Score of 26 (interquartile range, 18-42). Penetrating trauma occurred in 56%. Overall, mortality was 90% and was similar in penetrating and blunt trauma (88% vs. 94%; p = 0.34). There were no survivors among the 53 patients (46%) who arrived with no signs of life. Among the 11 patients (10%) who survived, median length of stay was 26 days (interquartile range, 6-28 days). Overall, 8% of EDT was performed at free-standing pediatric trauma centers, 45% at adult centers, and 47% at combined trauma centers. Mortality rates and indications were similar among trauma centers regardless of designation status. CONCLUSION: In a national population-based data set, the mortality after pediatric EDT is high, and many of these procedures are performed at nonpediatric trauma centers. Regardless of injury mechanism, EDT is not appropriate in children without signs of life on arrival. Pediatric guidelines are needed to increase awareness of the poor outcomes and limited indications for EDT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level IV.

Association of Trauma Center Level and Patient Volume with Outcomes for Penetrating Thoracic Trauma.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the potential link between trauma center American College of Surgeons verification level and institutional volume of penetrating thoracic trauma with outcomes for patients with penetrating thoracic trauma. METHODS: Penetrating thoracic injuries were identified in the National Trauma Data Bank from 2013 to 2016. Primary exposures were trauma center American College of Surgeons verification level and annual penetrating trauma caseload by center. Cox models were used to evaluate the association between primary exposures and mortality. Poisson regression was used to evaluate admission and outcome rate differences by trauma center status. RESULTS: Of 68,727 patients identified, 38% were treated at level I centers, 18% at level II centers, and 44% at other centers. Only 3.1% required major surgery for thoracic injury (3.1% at level I, 2.6% at level II, and 3.2% at other). Overall, annual volume of penetrating thoracic trauma was not associated with mortality. For specific injuries, level I centers had superior outcomes for injuries to the thoracic aorta and vena cava compared with other centers. Level I centers also showed improved outcomes for lung/bronchus injuries compared with level II centers. Level I centers had less sepsis/acute respiratory distress syndrome, but more surgical site infection, venous thromboembolism, and unplanned operation compared with non-level I centers. CONCLUSIONS: There was no identified impact of penetrating thoracic trauma volume or trauma center verification level on overall mortality. However, level I verification did correlate with improved outcomes for some specific injuries. Further study to identify factors that improve outcomes in patients with high-risk penetrating thoracic mechanisms is warranted.

Quetiapine therapy in critically injured trauma patients is associated with an increased risk of pulmonary complications.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate quetiapine-associated pulmonary complications (PC) in critically injured trauma patients. METHODS: Injured adults admitted during 2016 to the ICU at a Level I trauma center were analyzed. Outcomes were evaluated by competing risks survival analysis. RESULTS: Of 254 admissions, 40 (15.7%) had PC and 214 (84.3%) were non-events. PC patients were more severely injured, had longer hospital stays and were more likely to die. Patients administered quetiapine were more likely to develop PC and acquire PC earlier than those without quetiapine. Quetiapine was a positive risk factor for PC (sHR 2.24, p = 0.013). Stratification by ventilator use revealed non-ventilated patients administered quetiapine had the highest risk for PC (sHR 4.66, p = 0.099). CONCLUSIONS: Quetiapine exposure in critically injured trauma patients was associated with increased risk of PC. Guidelines for treatment of delirium with quetiapine in critically injured trauma patients should account for this risk.

Association of complicated gallstone disease in pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Complicated gallstone disease (CGD) is a common condition requiring intervention during pregnancy to avert adverse birth outcomes (ABO). METHODS: Cohort study using the California OSHPD 2007-2014 database. Records of pregnant patients were analyzed for gallbladder calculus within four months of delivery. Biliary system interventions were evaluated as the primary exposure. RESULTS: Of 7,597 patients, those with CGD had a greater likelihood of biliary system procedures than those with uncomplicated gallstone disease (36.6% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.001). Patients with CGD also had increased odds of ABO (OR 2.02, 95% CI, 1.48-2.76). Compared to patients without biliary system procedures, those with interventions for gallstones had an OR of 3.46 (95% CI, 2.48-4.82) for ABO. After adjustment, biliary system intervention for CGD had an even greater risk of ABO (OR 4.26, 95% CI, 2.86-6.35). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of ABO is significantly increased in women with CGD and intervention for gallstones.

Association of Operative Repair Type and Trauma Center Designation With Outcomes in Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVE: Open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) has shown improved outcomes at trauma centers. Whether the benefit of trauma center designation extends to endovascular repair of rAAA is unknown. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development 2007 to 2014 discharge database to identify patients with rAAA. Data included demographic and admission factors, discharge disposition, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes, and hospital characteristics. Hospitals were categorized by trauma center designation and teaching hospital status. The effect of repair type and trauma center designation (level I, level II, or other-other trauma centers and nondesignated hospitals) was evaluated to determine rates and risks of 9 postoperative complications, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day postdischarge mortality. RESULTS: Of 1941 rAAA repair patients, 61.2% had open and 37.8% had endovascular; 1.0% had both. Endovascular repair increased over the study interval. Hospitals were 12.0% level I, 25.0% level II, and 63.0% other. A total of 48.7% of hospitals were teaching hospitals (level I, 100%; level II, 42.2%; and other, 41.8%). Endovascular repair was significantly more common at teaching hospitals (41.5% vs 34.3%, P < .001) and was the primary repair method at level I trauma centers (P < .001). Compared with open repair, endovascular repair was protective for most complications and in-hospital mortality. The risk for in-hospital mortality was highest among endovascular patients at level II trauma centers (hazard ratio 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95-2.92) and other hospitals (hazard ratio 1.66, 95% CI: 1.01-2.72). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repair overall was associated with a lower risk of adverse outcomes. Endovascular repair at level I trauma centers had a lower risk of in-hospital mortality which may be a result of their teaching hospital status, organizational structure, and other factors. The weight of the contributions of such factors warrants further study.

Pediatric extremity vascular trauma: It matters where it is treated.

BACKGROUND: Extremity vascular injuries in children are rare events that present unique therapeutic challenges. The absence of a pediatric-specific protocol for definitive care of these injuries risks variability in treatment practices and outcomes. Using a nationwide data set, we investigated variations in the management and outcomes of pediatric patients with peripheral vascular trauma and characterized differences based on hospital category. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Trauma Data Bank to identify patients 16 years or younger with extremity vascular trauma admitted in calendar year 2016. Hospitals were categorized as ACS-verified pediatric trauma centers (Level I or II), ACS-verified adult trauma centers (Level I or II), or other hospitals (all other trauma centers and nondesignated hospitals). Patient data were evaluated by hospital category. RESULTS: Among 164,882 pediatric admissions, 702 patients were identified for analysis. There were 430 (61.3%) patients with upper-extremity injuries, 270 (38.5%) with lower-extremity injuries, and 2 (0.2%) had both. Mean age was 11.5 years, and 51.6% were blunt-injured. Overall, 40.2% were admitted to pediatric trauma centers, 28.9% to adult trauma centers, and 30.9% to other hospitals. Hospitals without ACS trauma center verification had a significantly higher amputation rate than any ACS-verified adult or pediatric center (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: The incidence of pediatric extremity vascular injury is low. Hospitals with ACS trauma center verification have greater pediatric limb salvage rates than those without verification. Future study should seek to identify specific regional or resource-related factors that contribute to this disparity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological, level III.

Evaluating surgical outcomes in pediatric extremity vascular trauma.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the epidemiology and management of pediatric vascular extremity trauma to assess injury patterns and other factors that may contribute to poor outcomes. METHODS: Using the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development discharge database, we identified pediatric patients with extremity arterial trauma admitted to acute-care hospitals from 2007 to 2014. Demographics, management patterns, and outcomes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 775 patients were treated for an extremity arterial injury. Overall, 40% were admitted to pediatric trauma centers and 39% to adult trauma centers. Management was predominantly by open surgical repair. Injury to the common femoral artery was associated with mortality (Hazard Ratio 3.9; 95% CI 1.1-14.5; p < 0.05). Popliteal artery injuries (Odds Ratio [OR] 4.8; 95% CI 1.2-19.9; p < 0.05) and anterior tibial artery injuries (OR 7.1; 95% CI 1.4-37.3; p < 0.05) had an increased risk of amputation. There was no difference in amputation or mortality rates by hospital category. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric extremity arterial injuries are rare. In California, outcomes are similar by hospital type. Common femoral artery injuries are associated with an increased risk of mortality, while popliteal and anterior tibial artery injuries are associated with an increased risk of amputation. TYPE OF STUDY: Prognosis Study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Quantifying the burden of pre-existing conditions in older trauma patients: A novel metric based on mortality risk.

INTRODUCTION: Pre-existing medical conditions (PEC) represent a unique domain of risk among older trauma patients. The study objective was to develop a metric to quantify PEC burden for trauma patients. METHODS: A cohort of 4526 non-severe blunt-injured trauma patients aged 55 years and older admitted to a Level I trauma center between January 2006 and December 2012 were divided into development (80%) and test (20%) sets. Cox regression was used to develop the model based on in-hospital and 90-day mortality. Regression coefficients were converted into a point-based PEC Risk Score. Performance of the PEC Risk Score was compared in the test set with two other PEC-based metrics and three injury-based metrics. An external cohort of 2284 trauma patients admitted in 2013 was used to evaluate combined metric performance. RESULTS: Total mortality was 9.4% and 9.1% in the development and test set, respectively. The final model included 12 PEC. In the test set, the PEC Risk Score (c-statistic: 79.7) was superior for predicting in-hospital and 90-day mortality compared with all other metrics. For in-hospital mortality alone, the PEC Risk Score similarly outperformed all other metrics. Combination of the PEC Risk Score and any injury-based metric significantly improved prediction compared with any injury-based metric alone. CONCLUSION: Our 12-item PEC Risk Score performed well compared with other metrics, suggesting that the classification of trauma-related mortality risk may be improved through its use. Among non-severely injured older trauma patients, the utility of prognostic metrics may be enhanced through the incorporation of comorbidities.

Outcomes after single-look trauma laparotomy: A large population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes following damage control laparotomy for trauma have been studied in detail. However, outcomes following a single operation, or "single-look trauma laparotomy" (SLTL), have not. We evaluated the association between SLTL and both short-term and long-term outcomes in a large population-based data set. METHODS: The California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development patient discharge database was evaluated for calendar years 2007 through 2014. Injured patients with SLTL during their index admission were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes. Diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify specific abdominal organ injuries, surgical interventions, and perioperative complications. Subsequent acute care admissions were examined for postoperative complications and related surgical interventions. Clinical characteristics, injuries, surgical interventions, and outcomes were analyzed by mechanism of injury. RESULTS: There were 2113 patients with SLTL during their index admission; 712 (33.7%) had at least one readmission to an acute care facility. Median time to first readmission was 110 days. Penetrating mechanism was more common than blunt (60.6% vs. 39.4%). Compared to patients with penetrating injury, blunt-injured patients had a significantly higher median Injury Severity Score (9 vs. 18, p < 0.0001) and a significantly higher mortality rate during the index admission (4.1% vs. 27.0%, p < 0.0001). More than 30% of SLTL patients requiring readmission had a surgery-related complication. The most common primary reasons for readmission were bowel obstruction (17.7%), incisional hernia (11.8%), and infection (9.1%). There was no significant association between mechanism of injury and development of surgery-related complications requiring readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SLTL had postinjury morbidity and mortality, and more than 30% required readmission. Complication rates for SLTL were comparable to those reported for emergency general surgery procedures. Patients should be educated on signs and symptoms of the most common complications before discharge following SLTL. Further investigation should focus on the factors associated with the development of these complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and epidemiologic study, level III.

A population-based analysis of outcomes after repair of thoracic aortic emergencies in trauma.

BACKGROUND: Large-scale assessments of outcomes in thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) for thoracic aortic emergencies are lacking. We evaluated perioperative outcomes of TEVAR compared with open surgery among trauma patients in a large statewide database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development 2007-2014 patient discharge database. Blunt-injured trauma patients with thoracic aortic emergencies were identified by International Classification for Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes and external cause-of-injury codes. Procedure codes were evaluated for TEVAR or open repair. Outcomes included mortality or complications during the index admission and readmission within 30 d. The association between both operative methods and each outcome was evaluated by two-level logistic regression adjusting for age, length of stay, admission year, trauma-related mortality probability, and comorbidity status. RESULTS: Among over 31 million hospitalizations, we identified 48,357 cases (0.2%) of thoracic aortic disease. Of these, 2159 (4.5%) were unique blunt-injured trauma patients of whom 336 (15.6%) underwent operative repair: 256 TEVAR (76.2%) and 80 (23.8%) open repair. Patients with open repair were older than TEVAR patients (mean age 52.0 versus 46.8, P = 0.038). There were no significant differences in race, sex, injury mechanism, mortality, or 30-d readmission by operative method. However, open repair was associated with greater odds for cardiac, spinal cord, and neurological complications. CONCLUSIONS: Although mortality in trauma patients who underwent TEVAR was similar to that in patients with open repair, TEVAR was associated with fewer complications. This suggests that TEVAR offers clinical benefit over open repair in treating trauma patients with aortic disease.

The prevalence of chronic deep venous thrombosis in trauma: Implications for hospitals and patients.

INTRODUCTION: Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is considered a preventable complication in trauma patients. Hospitals risk financial penalties for DVT rates above accepted benchmarks. These penalties do not apply to chronic DVT, which develops before admission. Lower-extremity duplex ultrasound (LEDUS) can detect characteristics of thrombus chronicity, allowing differentiation of chronic from acute DVT. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of chronic DVT in hospitalized trauma patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of trauma patients admitted to our Level I trauma center between July 1, 2006 and October 31, 2016 who had a DVT on initial screening LEDUS. Our center utilizes screening and surveillance LEDUS for patients admitted more than 48 hours. Definitions for chronic and acute DVT were extracted from existing literature. Patients with DVT on initial LEDUS underwent review of that LEDUS to assess clot chronicity and were classified as having acute DVT, chronic DVT, or DVT of indeterminate age. Demographic data, medical history, and injury characteristics were collected. Patients with acute DVT and those with chronic DVT were compared. RESULTS: The prevalence of chronic DVT among patients with a DVT on initial LEDUS was 29.9%. Chronic DVT occurred in patients who were older and less severely injured. An above-knee component was significantly more common in chronic DVT (65%). Only 34 (41%) of those with chronic DVT reported a history of DVT. Among the patients with chronic DVT, 44 (53%) had a subsequent LEDUS, of whom 4 (9%) showed thrombus progression and 6 (14%) formed a new DVT. CONCLUSION: Lower-extremity duplex ultrasound can identify chronic DVT, which represents nearly 30% of all DVT found on initial screening LEDUS in trauma patients. Those with chronic DVT should receive pharmacologic and mechanical prophylaxis because of the incidence of progression and new acute DVT. They should also be counseled regarding the possibilities of recurrence and chronic venous insufficiency. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, level III.

Hereditary thrombophilia in trauma patients with venous thromboembolism: Is routine screening necessary?

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), remains a common complication following trauma. The role of hereditary thrombophilia (HT) in posttraumatic VTE is unknown. In the general population with a first-time DVT, Factor V Leiden (FVL) and prothrombin G20210A mutation (PGM) are the most common types of HT with an incidence of 20% to 25% and 6% to 18%, respectively. The objective of this study was to identify the incidence of FVL and PGM in posttraumatic VTE to determine whether routine screening for HT in trauma should be performed. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study at our Level I trauma center from 2013 to 2016 when 70 patients with posttraumatic DVT and PE were screened for FVL and PGM. Demographics, injury characteristics, and established risk factors for VTE were collected for each patient. Statistical analysis was performed to compare patients with and without HT. RESULTS: The incidence of FVL and PGM in posttraumatic VTE was 1.4% and 5.7%, respectively. All HT-positive patients had a DVT and one had an associated PE. Both the individual risk factors and the total number of risk factors for VTE were similar between the HT-positive group and the HT-negative group. CONCLUSION: There was a lower incidence of FVL and PGM in patients with posttraumatic DVT than in patients with a first-time DVT in the general population. HT does not appear to significantly contribute to posttraumatic VTE in our trauma population. Further research is warranted to determine whether routine screening for HT in trauma should be performed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological study, level III; Care management/therapeutic study, level IV.