Assessment of panel slides prepared by phenol ammonium sulphate and NALC methods for proficiency testing.

BACKGROUND: Existing methods for the preparation of panel slides necessitate handling high-grade acid-fast bacilli positive sputum samples. OBJECTIVE: To compare panel slides prepared using the phenol ammonium sulphate sediment (PhAS) method with those prepared using the N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NALC) method in proficiency testing. METHODS: Pooled sputum specimens of known smear-positives and -negatives were divided into two parts: one part was used for preparing panel slides using the NALC method and the other using PhAS, a non-hazardous method. Respectively 413 and 384 smears of different grades were prepared in three batches using the PhAS and NALC methods. Smear grade and quality were recorded by 121 microscopists during proficiency testing in different states. Agreement between reference and reported results was analysed using the kappa test. RESULTS: The overall agreement was 96% for the PhAS method and 91% for the NALC method. There were 37 errors using the NALC method compared to 21 for the PhAS method (P < 0.223). Smear quality was equally good in both methods; however, the cell count was significantly higher in the PhAS than in the NALC method. CONCLUSION: The PhAS method, a non-hazardous procedure with good-quality smears, may be further explored for the preparation of panel slides.

Phenol ammonium sulphate basic fuchsin staining of sputum in pot for the detection of acid-fast bacilli.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Improper practices of making direct smears of sputum for detection of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) and of disposing sputum cups are hazardous. The present study was undertaken with the objective to stain sputum samples in their containers by 'phenol (10%) ammonium sulphate (4%) basic fuchsin (2%) solution' and to decolourize and counterstain their smears for detection of AFB- (henceforth called pot method) and to compare the smear results of pot method with the standard Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) method. METHODS: A total of 575 selected sputum samples from pulmonary tuberculosis patients were stained by the standard ZN and pot methods and the proportions of AFB positive smears were compared. RESULTS: Of the 575 samples, 126 were AFB positive for both the staining methods and the difference was not statistically significant. Pot method missed 9 ZN positive smears (8 scanty and one 1+) and ZN method missed 9 pot positive smears (9 scanty) and the difference was not significant. High grade smears (3+) were seen more in pot method (42) than in ZN method (25) and the difference was significant. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: Our findings showed that pot method was comparable to standard ZN method and had many advantages. Pot method can be explored further for the detection of AFB in sputum samples obtained from pulmonary tuberculosis suspects.

Pot method for storage & detection of acid-fast bacilli from sputum samples.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Sputum acid-fast bacilli (AFB) microscopy services are not available in all health facilities. Alternative procedures are needed to transport sputum samples to the diagnostic centres for detection of AFB. The objective of the present study was to evaluate sputum smears made by pot-method with the direct smears made immediately after sputum collection by Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) method. METHODS: Ninety three sputum samples from 49 pulmonary tuberculosis suspects were studied. Their direct smears (ZN smears) were stained by hot ZN method. The samples were then mixed with phenol ammonium sulphate basic fuchsin solution and stored at ambient conditions. The smears (pot smears), made on day 7, were then, decolourized and counter-stained for detection of AFB (pot method). The ZN and pot smears were read blind. After excluding 18 samples for various reasons, the results of pot and ZN smears of 63 samples from smear positive (2 of 3 direct smears were positive) and 12 from smear negative (3 of 3 direct smears were negative) patients were analysed. ZN method was the gold standard. RESULTS: Pot and ZN smears were positive in 61 of 63 samples from smear-positive patients and negative in 11 of 12 smear-negative patients (kappa = 0.87). The sensitivity and specificity of pot method were 96.8 and 91.7 per cent respectively. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: Sputum samples can be stored for up to seven days in the sputum container with phenol ammonium sulphate basic fuchsin solution. However, a comprehensive study needs to be done confirm the accuracy of the pot method for storage and transportation of sputum to microscopy centres for detection of AFB.

Contamination of stored sputum AFB smears with environmental mycobacteria.

To check the quality of stains and the acid-fast bacilli (AFB) staining procedure, a sample of 73 AFB-negative sputum smears selected systematically from a microscopy centre was rechecked before and after restaining with the same AFB staining method at a reference laboratory. Respectively 0 and 30 showed AFB before and after restaining. Detection of AFB after restaining in 30 of 73 negative smears triggered suspicion of contamination with environmental mycobacteria, which was confirmed by reexamination of these slides. Restaining before rechecking is a major limiting factor, and the results of external quality assessment should be ignored when contamination of slides is suspected.

A novel method of staining acid-fast bacilli in sputum containers.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Making centrifuged deposit smears from sputum to detect acid-fast bacilli (AFB) is considered hazardous. We carried out this study to stain the centrifuged deposits with carbol-fuchsin in sputum containers and to decolourize and counterstain their smears made on glass slides. METHODS: The centrifuged deposits of 180 sputum samples from pulmonary tuberculosis patients were used for making smears (initial deposit smears) and staining by Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) method for the detection of AFB. Each of the sputum deposit was then treated with one ml of 1 per cent carbol-fuchsin and a smear made between 2 to 3 h was then decolourized and counterstained by the same procedures followed in ZN method (2 h stained deposit smear). The coded initial deposit smears and the corresponding 2 h stained deposit smears were read by the same readers and the results compared. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty (70 positive and 80 negative) 2 h stained deposit smears were compared with initial deposit smears and the difference was not statistically significant. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: Centrifuged deposits of sputum in sputum containers can be stained by carbol-fuchsin within 2-3 h and their smears made subsequently on glass slides can then be decolourized and counterstained by the procedures followed in ZN method for detection of AFB by light microscopy.

Application of lot sampling of sputum AFB smears for the assessment of microscopy centres.

SETTING: Designated microscopy centres (DMC) and additional microscopy centres (AMC) performing sputum acid-fast bacilli (AFB) microscopy, the District TB Centre (DTC) and a reference laboratory (RL). OBJECTIVES: To ascertain the feasibility of adopting lot sampling of AFB smears and to assess the performance of MCs employing Senior Tuberculosis Laboratory Supervisors (STLS) with no knowledge about the principles of quality assurance of AFB microscopy and RL-based laboratory technicians with training on quality assurance for blinded checking of AFB smears. METHODS: Slides from MCs were transported to the DTC and the RL; 20 smears per month per MC were selected systematically; 1547 slides from DMCs and 726 from AMCs were checked, respectively, by STLSs at the DTC and by RL laboratory technicians. Discrepancies were resolved by referee. RESULTS: The discrepancy between MC laboratory technicians and STLSs at the DTC was 4.7%, compared to 1% at the RL. The STLSs and RL-based laboratory technicians had 70 and 2 errors, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lot sampling of AFB smears is feasible under field conditions. Assessment of MCs was more valid with RL-based technicians trained in principles of quality assurance of sputum AFB microscopy than with STLSs with no such training and working in the field.

Storage of heat-fixed unstained sputum AFB smears for panel testing in a tuberculosis unit in South India.

To evaluate the suitability for panel testing of heat-fixed unstained sputum AFB smears stored for up to 10 months, panels of slides were prepared at the national laboratory and stored under ambient conditions. Every month, three slides were utilised for panel testing in each of 12 microscopy centres; 70 smears were checked in a blinded fashion after 10 months. Reading errors occurred in 15/360 slides used in panel testing and in 4/70 slides used in blinded checking. The quality and grading of heat-fixed unstained smears were unaffected for up to 10 months and were found suitable for panel testing.

Lot quality assurance sampling of sputum acid-fast bacillus smears for assessing sputum smear microscopy centers.

Assessment of 12 microscopy centers in a tuberculosis unit by blinded checking of eight sputum smears selected by using a lot quality assurance sampling (LQAS) method and by unblinded checking of all positive and five negative slides, among the slides examined in a month in a microscopy centre, revealed that the LQAS method can be implemented in the field to monitor the performance of acid-fast bacillus microscopy centers in national tuberculosis control programs.