Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cureus ; 16(4): e58904, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38800182

RESUMEN

Background COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2, led to a global pandemic necessitating urgent vaccine development and deployment. By the end of 2020, several vaccines had reached their clinical trial endpoints. India, leveraging its pharmaceutical prowess, developed two primary vaccines: CoviShield® and Covaxin®. Despite the availability of these vaccines, vaccine hesitancy became a notable challenge. This study aimed to assess the correlation between vaccination status and lung involvement in COVID-19 patients, aiming to fortify trust in vaccines and enhance vaccine uptake in India. Methods This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed data from 272 patients treated at a designated COVID-19 Care Center in Chennai, India, from May to July 2021. Patients were divided into vaccinated and unvaccinated groups, with vaccinated individuals further categorized based on the type and dose of vaccine received (CoviShield® or Covaxin®). Lung involvement was assessed through CT chest scans, and statistical analyses were performed to compare the severity of lung involvement across different groups. Results The vaccinated group demonstrated significantly lower mean lung involvement (28%) compared to the unvaccinated group (34.8%). Within vaccinated individuals, no significant differences were observed between different vaccine types and doses, suggesting a generalized protective effect of COVID-19 vaccination against severe lung involvement. Conclusion Vaccination against COVID-19 significantly reduces the severity of lung involvement among patients, irrespective of the vaccine brand or dose. This study reinforces the importance of vaccination in mitigating the impact of COVID-19 and supports ongoing vaccination efforts.

2.
Cureus ; 16(3): e55415, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38567206

RESUMEN

Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), resulting from the severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has not only shown substantial effects on the respiratory system but also on extrapulmonary systems, including cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, hematological, and immune responses, notably spleen enlargement. The connection between the enlargement of the spleen and pulmonary complications in individuals with COVID-19 is still not well elucidated, with current studies offering divergent conclusions. Objective This study aims to elucidate the correlation between splenomegaly, as assessed by computed tomography (CT) imaging, and the extent of lung involvement (LI) in COVID-19 patients, thereby offering insights into potential prognostic indicators. Methodology A hospital-based, cross-sectional, retrospective study was conducted involving 1058 symptomatic COVID-19 patients confirmed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), aged 18 years and above. CT imaging was utilized to evaluate spleen size and LI. Statistical analyses, including Pearson correlation and simple linear regression, were performed to explore the relationship between spleen size and LI. Results The study cohort exhibited a mean spleen size of 9.49 cm and a mean LI score of 0.272. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated at 0.0495, indicating a marginal positive correlation between spleen size and LI. Regression analysis demonstrated a minimal impact of spleen size on LI, with spleen size accounting for only 0.2% of the variance in LI scores. Conclusions The study found a slight, statistically non-significant correlation between splenomegaly and LI in COVID-19 patients, suggesting that while splenic enlargement may reflect systemic disease involvement, it is not a strong independent predictor of lung damage extent. The findings highlight the complexity of extrapulmonary manifestations and highlight the need for additional research to fully understand the implications of splenic involvement in COVID-19.

3.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 73(3): 290-295, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34471616

RESUMEN

Cribriform plate is the commonest site of Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, its fragility and juxtaposition of arachnoid's investment to the bone, where the olfactory nerve pierces the skull, is a vulnerable site for CSF leak. Endoscopic transnasal approach has been the main stay for CSF leak repair over the past 2 decades. The technique and surgical steps of Endoscopic Surgical Repair of Cribriform CSF Leak using Free Septal Mucosal Graft without Postoperative Nasal packs are presented. Transnasal endoscopic CSF leak repair under General anesthesia with free mucosal graft, the critical steps include visualize the site of leak, lateralisation of middle turbinate, defect site cauterised with bipolar cautery. Free mucosal from contralateral side of the septum was placed as overlay technique. Graft stabilised with surgicel after ensuring adequate contact between the graft and the defect site. If the defect site is large then fat harvested from thigh is used as bath plug the defect, then free mucosal graft is kept supported by surgicel. Finally the middle turbinate was medialized and sutured with 3 0' Vicryl with nasal septum to support the graft and also to stabilize the middle turbinate as a quilting stich. No fibrin glue was used in our case series. No nasal packing was done. Patients discharged on 2nd or 3rd postoperative day. This technique provides consistent good results reduced operating time of 40 min, no post-operative morbidity, early mobilisation, with 100% success rate and with added advantage of no nasal packing, patient can easily breathing through the nose postoperatively & no recurrence on long follow up.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...