Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes for Nonagenarian Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Studies have previously reported higher complication rates in elective total joint arthroplasty (TJA) for nonagenarians compared with younger cohorts. The purpose of this study was to assess whether nonagenarians were still at increased risk of complications and hospital readmissions by answering three questions: (1) Do nonagenarians have an increased risk of medical complications after TJA compared with octogenarians and septuagenarians? (2) Do nonagenarians have an increased risk of surgical complications after TJA compared with octogenarians and septuagenarians? (3) Do nonagenarians have an increased risk of hospital readmission after TJA compared with octogenarians and septuagenarians? METHODS: A total of 174 patients undergoing primary TJA between 2010 and 2017 were included; 58 nonagenarians (older than 90 years) were matched with 58 octogenarians (age 80 to 84 years) and 58 septuagenarians (age 70 to 74). Groups were matched by sex, diagnosis, surgeon, surgical joint, and year of surgery. Within each group, 31 patients (53%) underwent total hip arthroplasty and 27 patients (47%) underwent total knee arthroplasty. Comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scores, and Charlson Comorbidity Index scores were captured preoperatively. Complications and readmissions occurring within 90 days postoperatively were evaluated. RESULTS: Nonagenarians had the highest rate of medical complications (33%) compared with octogenarians (14%) and septuagenarians (3%) (P < 0.001). Rates of surgical complications were not statistically different among nonagenarians (12%), octogenarians (9%), and septuagenarians (10%) (P = 0.830). Rates of hospital readmission were highest in nonagenarian patients (11%), but not statistically different compared with octogenarians (5%) or septuagenarians (2%) (P = 0.118). CONCLUSION: Nonagenarians were 3.1 times more likely to have a complication after TJA. The incidence of medical complications was highest in nonagenarians compared with octogenarians and septuagenarians, but rates of orthopaedic complications were similar. Nonagenarians who elect to proceed with TJA should be informed that they have an increased risk of postoperative medical complications compared with younger patients undergoing the same operation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic Study.

Laboratory-Reported Normal Value Ranges Should Not Be Used to Diagnose Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical laboratories offer several multipurpose tests, such as the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), which are not intended to diagnose any specific disease but are used by clinicians in multiple fields. The results and laboratory interpretation (normal/abnormal) of these multipurpose tests are based on laboratory-reported normal thresholds, which vary across clinical laboratories. In 2018, the International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection (2018 ICM) provided a gold-standard definition to diagnose periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) which included many multipurpose laboratory tests, along with thresholds optimized to diagnose PJI. The discrepancy between laboratory-reported normal thresholds and 2018 ICM-recommended PJI-optimized test thresholds has never been studied. The purpose of this study was to assess the existing variation in laboratory-reported normal thresholds for tests commonly used to diagnose PJI and evaluate the potential diagnostic impact of using laboratory-reported normal thresholds instead of 2018 ICM-recommended PJI-optimized thresholds. METHODS: Clinical laboratories (N=85) were surveyed to determine the laboratory-reported units of measure and normal thresholds for common multipurpose tests to diagnose PJI, including the ESR, CRP, D-dimer, synovial fluid white blood cells (SF-WBC), and polymorphonuclear cell percent (SF-PMN%). The variability of units of measure and normal thresholds for each test was then assessed among the 85 included clinical laboratories. A representative dataset from patients awaiting a revision arthroplasty was used to determine the clinical significance of the existing discrepancy between laboratory-reported normal test interpretations and 2018 ICM-recommended PJI-optimized test interpretations. RESULTS: Two units of measure for the CRP and six units of measure for the D-dimer were observed, with only 59% of laboratories reporting the CRP in terms of mg/L and only 16% reporting the D-dimer in ng/ml, as needed to utilize the 2018 ICM definition of PJI. Across clinical laboratories surveyed, the mean laboratory-reported normal thresholds for the ESR (20 mm/h), CRP (7.69 mg/L), D-dimer (500 ng/mL), SF-WBC (5 cells/uL), and SF-PMN% (25%) were substantially lower than the 2018 ICM-recommended PJI-optimized thresholds of 30 mm/h, 10 mg/L, 860 ng/mL, 3,000 cells/uL, and 70%, respectively. Interpretation of test results from a representative PJI dataset using each laboratory's normal test thresholds yielded mean false-positive rates of 14% (ESR), 18% (CRP), 42% (D-dimer), 93% (SF-WBC), and 36% (SF-PMN%) versus the ICM-recommended PJI-optimized thresholds. CONCLUSION: When reporting the results for multipurpose laboratory tests, such as the ESR, CRP, D-dimer, SF-WBC, and SF-PMN%, clinical laboratories utilize laboratory-reported units of measure and normal thresholds that are not intended to diagnose PJI, and therefore may not match the 2018 ICM recommendations. Our findings reveal that laboratory-reported normal thresholds for these multipurpose tests are well below the 2018 ICM recommendations to diagnose PJI. Clinical reliance on laboratory-reported results and interpretations, instead of strict use of the 2018 ICM-recommended units and PJI-optimized thresholds, may lead to false-positive interpretation of multipurpose laboratory tests.

False-Positive Automated Synovial Fluid White Blood Cell Counting Is a Concern for Both Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Aspirates.

BACKGROUND: Although false elevation of automated leukocyte (white blood cell [WBC]) counts has been described in the setting of hip corrosion, the more general correlation between manual and automated cell counts among synovial fluid aspirates from hip and knee arthroplasties has not been studied. METHODS: This retrospective review at one laboratory identified 8607 consecutive synovial fluid samples from arthroplasties and 812 from native knees, each with an automated WBC count > 3000 cells/µL and a corresponding paired reflex manual count. The correlation between automated and manual counts was evaluated, as was the rate of false-positive automated WBC counts. RESULTS: The correlation between automated WBC counts for native knees, total knee arthroplasties, and total hip arthroplasties was near-perfect, strong, and moderate, respectively. The false-positive rates for automated counts were 4.4%, 10.1%, and 34.3%, respectively (P < .0001). International Consensus Meeting scores and culture positivity demonstrated that manual counts, not automated counts, were correct. CONCLUSION: The presence of a hip or knee arthroplasty appears to substantially increase the risk of a false-positive automated synovial fluid WBC count. Clinicians evaluating an arthroplasty should exercise caution when interpreting positive automated WBC counts, and consider requesting a reflex manual count, to verify the accuracy of automated cell counting.

Predicting Blood Loss in Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty.

Marked blood loss during lower extremity total joint arthroplasties may lead to higher rates of transfusion, which may negatively affect surgical outcomes and yield greater complication rates. It is therefore ideal to identify factors that may increase the likelihood of blood loss, so they can be modified. From this review, it can be concluded that preoperative anemia, older age, multiple comorbidities, increased operative time, and use of postoperative anticoagulation may lead to higher blood loss and transfusion rates, although the influence of other factors remains controversial.