Combined treatment with pegylated interferon-alpha-2a and dacarbazine in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma: a phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Dacarbazine (DTIC) and pegylated interferon (IFN)-alpha-2a have both demonstrated some efficacy as single agents in metastatic melanoma. To the authors' knowledge, the current study is the first to test a combination of these 2 agents in a phase 2 trial. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with stage IV melanoma without brain metastases were treated with DTIC (at a dose of 850 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks) combined with weekly pegylated IFN-alpha-2a at a dose of 180 microg. The study was initiated to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the combination. The primary study endpoint was objective response. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were evaluable for response. Two patients (8.0%) achieved a complete response that continued for >480 days and 746 days, respectively. Four patients (16.0%) demonstrated a partial response, and another patient experienced stable disease. Six of 7 nonprogressive patients had either not received treatment or had not developed disease progression during adjuvant IFN treatment for stage II/III disease. The median duration of response was 236 days, the median progression-free survival was 56 days, and the overall survival time was 403 days. Few grade 3 toxicities and only 1 grade 4 toxicity were observed (according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of DTIC and pegylated IFN-alpha-2a was found to be well tolerated in patients with metastatic melanoma. The response rate of 24%, including 2 long-lasting complete responses, is encouraging, but must be confirmed in larger trials.

An exploratory study of systemic administration of the toll-like receptor-7 agonist 852A in patients with refractory metastatic melanoma.

PURPOSE: A topical Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7) agonist induces regression of cutaneous melanocytic neoplasms. We explored antitumor activity of a systemically administered TLR7 agonist, 852A, in patients with metastatic melanoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We undertook a phase II, multicenter, open-label study in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic melanoma. Patients received i.v. 852A, starting at 0.6 mg/m(2) and increasing to 0.9 mg/m(2) based on tolerance, thrice per week for 12 weeks. Clinical response was determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Immune effects of 852A were monitored by measuring serum type I IFN and IP-10 together with assessment of immune cell markers in peripheral blood. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were enrolled. Thirteen patients completed the initial 12-week treatment cycle, with two discontinuing for adverse events considered to be possibly related to study drug. Four (19%) patients had disease stabilization for >100 days. One patient had a partial remission after two treatment cycles, but progressed during the third. Dose-limiting toxicity was observed in two patients. Serum type I IFN and IP-10 increased in most patients on 852A administration. Serum type I IFN increases were greater after dosing with 852A 0.9 mg/m(2) than after 0.6 mg/m(2) (P = 0.009). The maximal increase in IP-10 compared with baseline correlated with the maximal increase in type I IFN (P = 0.003). In the eight patients with immune cell marker data, CD86 expression on monocytes increased significantly post-first dose (P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Intravenous 852A was well tolerated and induced systemic immune activation that eventually resulted in prolonged disease stabilization in some patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma who had failed chemotherapy.

S-100B and FDG-PET/CT in therapy response assessment of melanoma patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the value of the tumor marker S-100B protein and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in patients treated for melanoma metastases. METHODS: In 41 patients with proven melanoma metastases, S-100B measurements and FDG-PET/CT were performed before and after therapy. The change of S-100B levels (DeltaS-100B) was assessed. In all patients, therapy response was assessed with PET/CT using visual criteria and change of maximal standard uptake value (DeltaSUV(max.)) or total lesion glycolysis (DeltaTLG). RESULTS: In 15 of 41 patients (37%), S-100B values were not suitable because they were normal before and after therapy. In 26 patients, S-100B was suitable for therapy response assessment. PET/CT was suitable for response assessment in all patients. Correlations between DeltaS-100B and DeltaTLG (r = 0.850, p < 0.001) and between DeltaS-100B and DeltaSUV(max.) (r = 0.818, p < 0.001) were both excellent. A complete agreement between S-100B and PET/CT response assessment was achieved in 22 of 26 patients. In 4 patients, therapy response differed between the S-100B and PET/CT findings, but subsequent S-100B measurements realigned the S-100B results with the later PET/CT findings. CONCLUSION: In a third of our patients with metastases, the S-100B tumor marker was not suitable for therapy assessment. In these patients, imaging techniques remain necessary, and FDG-PET/CT can be used for response assessment.

Tumour assessment in advanced melanoma: value of FDG-PET/CT in patients with elevated serum S-100B.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of PET/CT in melanoma patients with an elevated serum S-100B tumour marker level. METHODS: Out of 165 consecutive high-risk melanoma patients referred for PET/CT imaging, 47 had elevated (>0.2 microg/l) S-100B serum levels and a contemporaneous 18F-FDG PET/CT scan. PET/CT scans were evaluated for the presence of metastases. To produce a composite reference standard, we used cytological, histological, MRI and PET/CT follow-up findings as well as clinical and S-100B follow-up. RESULTS: Among the 47 patients with increased S-100B levels, PET/CT correctly identified metastases in 38 (30 distant metastases and eight lymph node metastases). In one patient with cervical lymph node metastases, PET/CT was negative. Eight patients had no metastases and PET/CT correctly excluded metastases in all of them. Overall sensitivity for metastases was 97% (38/39), specificity 100% (8/8) and accuracy 98% (46/47). S-100B was significantly higher in patients with distant metastases (mean 1.93 microg/l, range 0.3-14.3 microg/l) than in patients with lymph node metastases (mean 0.49 microg/l, range 0.3-1.6 microg/l, p=0.003) or patients without metastases (mean 0.625 microg/l, range 0.3-2.6 microg/l, p=0.007). However, 6 of 14 patients with a tumour marker level of 0.3 microg/l had no metastases. CONCLUSION: In melanoma patients with elevated S-100B tumour marker levels, FDG-PET/CT accurately identifies lymph node or distant metastases and reliably excludes metastases. Because of the significant number of false positive S-100B tumour marker determinations (17%), we recommend repetition of tumour marker measurements if elevated S-100B levels occur before extensive imaging is used.