Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 61
Filtrar
1.
Curr Cardiol Rep ; 26(3): 91-96, 2024 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38236518

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an increasingly recognized cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), particularly among women < 50 years of age. Here, we aim to review the pathogenesis of SCAD, discuss SCAD as an initial manifestation of systemic arterial disease, and highlight invasive strategies as well as unique challenges in the care of women with SCAD. RECENT FINDINGS: A paradigm shift has occurred in the care of SCAD patients in the past decade as recommendations for conservative management have become widespread. Invasive interventions are reserved for patients with hemodynamic compromise or active ischemia due to increased periprocedural complications and failure rates. Certain patient populations have been identified for larger territory infarcts and proximal disease including patients with known connective tissue disease, premenopausal women, and patients with pregnancy-associated SCAD (P-SCAD). Current recommended management of SCAD is conservative. Despite a growing awareness of SCAD and its known association with systemic arteriopathies in women, evidence-based data remains scarce. Future studies focused on identifying genetic factors, optimal medical therapy after SCAD, and techniques to minimize interventional complications are needed.


Asunto(s)
Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios , Enfermedades Vasculares , Enfermedades Vasculares/congénito , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Factores de Riesgo , Vasos Coronarios , Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Enfermedades Vasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Vasculares/terapia , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/complicaciones , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/terapia
8.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 29(9): 1150-1159, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32667846

RESUMEN

Background: The goals of this multicenter survey were to examine the prevalence and patient awareness of cardiovascular risk factors, and the association between history of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO­including gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, and preeclampsia) and prevalence of cardiovascular risks among women presenting to outpatient obstetrics/gynecology (OB/GYN) clinics. Materials and Methods: We surveyed 2,946 female patients attending 16 outpatient OB/GYN clinics across the United States between January 2010 and January 2012. Main outcome measures were self-reported cardiovascular risk factors and symptoms such as angina and dyspnea. Results: Mean age of the patients was 51 ± 13.6 years. Cardiovascular risks and symptoms were highly prevalent (86.0% and 40.1%, respectively). Many patients did not know if they had common risk factors such as hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, or diabetes (18.4%, 32.0%, and 17.9%, respectively). Women with a history of APO were slightly more likely to be aware of common risk factors, including abnormal blood pressure (17% vs. 18.6%), high cholesterol (31.7% vs. 32%), and obesity/elevated body mass index (43.9% vs. 49.7%). Compared with patients with no history of APO, patients with APO (n = 380, 12.9%) were more likely to have risk factors (89.5% vs. 83.9%, p = 0.002) and symptoms (45.5% vs. 39.3%, p = 0.02). Conclusions: Awareness of cardiovascular risk factors and symptoms among all women surveyed in this study was poor, although awareness for some risk factors was relatively higher among patients with APO. This study demonstrates the feasibility of cardiovascular assessment in OB/GYN clinics using a simple questionnaire and its potential role for early recognition and timely intervention.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Ginecología , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Adulto , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obstetricia , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Salud de la Mujer
9.
Am J Cardiol ; 125(7): 1088-1095, 2020 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32046822

RESUMEN

There is growing interest in "minimalist" transcatheter aortic valve implantation (M-TAVI), performed with conscious sedation instead of general anesthesia (GA-TAVI). We assessed the impact of M-TAVI on procedural efficiency, long-term safety, and quality of life (QoL) in 477 patients with severe aortic stenosis (82 years, women 50%, STS 5.0), who underwent M-TAVI (n = 278) or GA-TAVI (n = 199). M-TAVI patients were less likely to have NYHA Class ≥3, valve-in-valve TAVI, and receive self-expanding valves. M-TAVI was completed without conversion to GA in 269 (97%) patients. M-TAVI was more efficient that GA-TAVI including shorter lengths of stay (2 vs 3 days, p <0.0001), higher likelihood of being discharged home (87% vs 72%, p <0.0001), less use of blood transfusions (10% vs 22%, p = 0.0008), inotropes (13% vs 32%, p <0.0001), contrast volume (50 vs 90 ml, p <0.0001), fluoroscopy time (20 vs 24 minute, p <0.0001), and need for >1 valves (0.4 vs 5.5%, p = 0.0004). At 1-month, death/stroke (M-TAVI vs GA-TAVI 4.0 vs 6.5%) and a "safety composite" end point (death, stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, new dialysis, major vascular complication, major or life-threatening bleeding, and new pacemaker: 17.6% vs 21.1%) were similar (p = NS for both). At a median follow-up of 365 days, survival curves showed similar incidence of death/stroke as well as the safety composite end point between the groups. QoL scores were similar at baseline and 1-month after TAVI. In multivariable analyses, M-TAVI showed significant improvements in all parameters of procedural efficiency. In conclusion, M-TAVI is more efficient than GA-TAVI, with similar safety at 1-month and long-term, and similar QoL scores at 1 month.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia General/métodos , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Sedación Consciente/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/psicología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28794119

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite the demonstrated safety of the same-day discharge (SDD) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), uptake of this program has been relatively poor in the United States. We evaluated the temporal trends and variations in the utilization of SDD after PCI during the contemporary era. In addition, we evaluated the predictors of SDD (compared with next-day discharge) and the causes of readmission in these 2 patient cohorts. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were extracted from State Ambulatory Surgical Database and State Inpatient Database from Florida and New York ranging from 2009 to 2013. All adults undergoing PCI in an outpatient setting were included. Data were merged with the directory available from the American Hospital Association to obtain detailed information on hospital-related characteristics. Unplanned readmissions within 7 and 30 days constituted the coprimary outcomes. There was modest increase in the proportion of SDD after PCI from 2.5% in 2009 to 7.4% in 2013 (P-trend <0.001). SDD was more frequently used among male and younger patients with fewer comorbidities. There were considerable differences in the discharge practices among the different hospital types. Larger hospitals, teaching hospitals, and high PCI volume hospitals had higher utilization of SDD compared with their respective counterparts. SDD and next-day discharge cohorts had similar rates of unplanned readmissions, in-hospital mortality, and acute myocardial infarction during follow-up. Furthermore, uninsured patients had significantly lower odds of SDD along with higher incidence of unplanned readmission within 30 days after PCI compared with insured patients. CONCLUSIONS: During 2009 to 2013, there has been a modest increase in SDD after PCI. Several demographic and clinical characteristics play critical role in determination of SDD after PCI. There were significant disparities in discharge practices between different sex, racial, and insurance-based strata.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Coronaria/terapia , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Alta del Paciente/tendencias , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/tendencias , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud/tendencias , Anciano , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Comorbilidad , Enfermedad Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Coronaria/etnología , Enfermedad Coronaria/mortalidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Florida , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Hospitales/tendencias , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , New York , Oportunidad Relativa , Readmisión del Paciente/tendencias , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Puntaje de Propensión , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
J Thorac Dis ; 9(6): 1437-1439, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28740651
13.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 89(2): 245-251, 2017 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27142567

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pre-hospital electrocardiograms (ECGs) are believed to reduce time to reperfusion in ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) patients. Little is known of their impact on clinical outcomes in a rural setting. Geisinger regional STEMI network provides percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) care to over a 100-mile radius in rural central Pennsylvania. METHODS: A retrospective analysis identified 280 consecutive STEMI patients treated with PCI between 1/1/09 and 8/31/11. Comparison between two STEMI groups was performed: 205 patients who were taken by the emergency medical system (EMS) to the nearest hospital (a non-PCI center), underwent an ECG revealing a STEMI, and were transported immediately to Geisinger Medical Center (GMC) for PCI (transfer group) versus 75 patients in whom a pre-hospital ECG was obtained and who were transported by EMS directly to Geisinger for PCI, bypassing the nearest hospital that did not perform PCI (the pre-hospital ECG group). RESULTS: Analysis of baseline characteristics revealed that the pre-hospital ECG cohort was older (65 vs. 60 years); had a higher percentage of previous myocardial infarctions (MI) (28% vs. 15%), heart failure (11% vs. 4%), and prior PCI (23% vs. 13%; p < 0.05 all comparisons). Median time from EMS contact to pre-hospital ECG in the pre-hospital ECG group was 5 minutes; from pre-hospital ECG to the GMC ED was 34 minutes. Median time from first medical contact (EMS contact) to reperfusion (device activation) was 79 versus 157 minutes (P < 0.001), respectively in pre-hospital ECG vs. transfer groups. Mortality in the two groups at 1 year was 4.1% in the pre-hospital ECG group versus 8.3% in the transfer group (P-value = 0.34). After adjusting for the difference in age between the two groups, the 62% reduction in 1 year mortality associated with having obtained a pre-hospital ECG was still not statistically significant (P-value = 0.19). CONCLUSION: In a rural regional STEMI network, pre-hospital ECGs decreased time from first medical contact to reperfusion by 50% and were associated with an excellent clinical outcome at 1 year. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Electrocardiografía , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Servicios de Salud Rural , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Anciano , Ambulancias , Áreas de Influencia de Salud , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Pennsylvania , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/fisiopatología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Science ; 354(6319)2016 Dec 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28008009

RESUMEN

The DiscovEHR collaboration between the Regeneron Genetics Center and Geisinger Health System couples high-throughput sequencing to an integrated health care system using longitudinal electronic health records (EHRs). We sequenced the exomes of 50,726 adult participants in the DiscovEHR study to identify ~4.2 million rare single-nucleotide variants and insertion/deletion events, of which ~176,000 are predicted to result in a loss of gene function. Linking these data to EHR-derived clinical phenotypes, we find clinical associations supporting therapeutic targets, including genes encoding drug targets for lipid lowering, and identify previously unidentified rare alleles associated with lipid levels and other blood level traits. About 3.5% of individuals harbor deleterious variants in 76 clinically actionable genes. The DiscovEHR data set provides a blueprint for large-scale precision medicine initiatives and genomics-guided therapeutic discovery.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Enfermedad/genética , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Exoma/genética , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Adulto , Diseño de Fármacos , Frecuencia de los Genes , Genómica , Humanos , Hipolipemiantes/farmacología , Mutación INDEL , Lípidos/sangre , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN
16.
Am J Cardiol ; 118(4): 560-6, 2016 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27381665

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to compare outcomes in women after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using a self-expanding prosthesis in patients with severe aortic stenosis who were at high risk for SAVR. Although registries and meta-analyses have suggested that TAVR is of considerable benefit in women, perhaps even more so than in men, a rigorous evaluation of TAVR with a self-expanding valve versus SAVR in women from a randomized trial has not been performed. Patients with severe aortic stenosis were randomized 1:1 to either TAVR or SAVR. Outcomes at 1 year are reported. Treatment was attempted in a total of 353 women (183 TAVR and 170 SAVR). Baseline characteristics and predicted risk of the 2 groups were comparable, although the frequency of diabetes mellitus was lower in patients undergoing TAVR (33.3% vs 45.3%; p = 0.02). TAVR-treated patients experienced a statistically significant 1-year survival advantage compared with SAVR patients (12.7% vs 21.8%; p = 0.03). The composite all-cause mortality or major stroke rate also favored TAVR (14.9% vs 24.2%; p = 0.04). Quality of life, as measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire summary score, for both the TAVR and SAVR groups increased significantly from baseline to 1 year. In conclusion, female TAVR patients had lower 1-year mortality and lower 1-year all-cause mortality or major stroke compared with women undergoing SAVR, with both cohorts experiencing improved quality of life. Further studies specifically in women are warranted to validate these findings.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Causas de Muerte , Femenino , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Humanos , Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Am J Cardiol ; 118(3): 396-402, 2016 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27346591

RESUMEN

Treatment for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis has changed significantly in recent years due to advances in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Recent studies with the CoreValve prosthesis have demonstrated superior results compared with surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at increased risk for surgery, but there are limited data on gender-related differences in patient characteristics and outcomes with this device. We compared baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes in women and men undergoing TAVR with the CoreValve prosthesis. A total of 3,687 patients (1,708 women and 1,979 men) were included. At baseline, women tended to be slightly older and to have increased frailty, but they had fewer cardiac co-morbidities, higher left ventricular systolic function, less coronary artery disease, and fewer previous strokes. All-cause mortality was 5.9% for women and 5.8% for men at 30 days (p = 0.87) and 24.1% and 21.3%, respectively, at 1 year (p = 0.08). The incidence of stroke was 5.7% in women and 4.0% in men at 30 days (p = 0.02) and 9.3% and 7.7%, respectively, at 1 year (p = 0.05). Women had a higher incidence of bleeding, including more life-threatening bleeds, and a greater incidence of major vascular complications than men at 30 days. Device success was achieved in 86.9% of women and 86.1% of men (p = 0.50). In conclusion, although there were significant baseline differences and procedure-related complications between women and men undergoing TAVR with the CoreValve prosthesis, this analysis found no significant difference in 30-day or 1-year mortality.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/epidemiología , Causas de Muerte , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Anciano Frágil , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Mortalidad , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/epidemiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Sexuales , Resultado del Tratamiento , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/epidemiología
18.
Coron Artery Dis ; 27(6): 442-8, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27100661

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine trends in use and outcomes of second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) across sexes in a contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) cohort. BACKGROUND: Sparse female enrollment in trials comparing first-generation versus second-generation DES may influence clinical decision making at the time of PCI. METHODS: We studied patients undergoing PCI with DES enrolled in the CathPCI Registry between July 2009 and March 2013. We compared the prevalence of second-generation DES use by sex over time. Outcomes included procedural success, post-PCI bleeding, and vascular complications. Associations between sex and DES type on outcomes were assessed using logistic regression with formal interaction tests. RESULTS: Compared with men (n=1 129 122; 67.7%), women (n=538 835; 32.3%) were older, with a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular, and chronic kidney disease. Although use of second-generation DES increased among both men and women over time, use was higher among men in the first 1.5 years, with no differences thereafter. There were no differences in procedural success, bleeding, or vascular complications across sexes between first-generation and second-generation DES. CONCLUSION: Uptake of second-generation DES increased over time in women, with comparable in-hospital benefits as first-generation DES across sexes.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Anciano , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Comorbilidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos/tendencias , Femenino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Prevalencia , Diseño de Prótesis , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
19.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 87(4): 663-8, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26255880

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To examine the practice patterns and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures performed by female interventional cardiologists in the United States (U.S.). BACKGROUND: Little is known about the prevalence, volume, case mix, and outcomes of PCI procedures performed by female interventional cardiologists. METHODS: Using data from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry(®) , we performed a retrospective study of 2,465,685 PCI procedures performed at 1,431 U.S. hospitals between July 1, 2009 and June 30, 2013. Interventionalist sex was ascertained from the National Provider Identifier number of each operator. RESULTS: Women accounted for only 4% (412/9,179) of interventional cardiologists in the U.S., and performed 3% (n = 70,009) of all PCI procedures during the time period studied. Forty-one percent of female interventionalists operated at an institution with no other female operators. Female interventionalists performed a median of 48 PCI procedures per year (interquartile range: 22-87). Of the cases performed by female interventionalists, 77% were performed on patients with acute coronary syndrome, 3% on patients with cardiogenic shock, and 16% on call. In-hospital mortality was low (1.8%), and was not significantly different between female operators with high (≥50 cases/year) versus low (1.95% vs. 1.75%, unadjusted P = 0.12, adjusted OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.84-1.27) annual procedure volume. CONCLUSIONS: Female interventional cardiologists remain uncommon in contemporary U.S. practice. Performing only a very small proportion of PCI cases, female interventionalists are often low-volume operators, yet no significant differences in patient mortality were observed in low- versus high-volume operators.


Asunto(s)
Cardiólogos/tendencias , Cardiopatías/terapia , Grupos Minoritarios , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/tendencias , Médicos Mujeres/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud/tendencias , Atención Posterior/tendencias , Femenino , Cardiopatías/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Distribución por Sexo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
20.
J Interv Cardiol ; 28(3): 223-32, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25991082

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the relationship between preoperative platelet function and perioperative bleeding in patients undergoing CABG. BACKGROUND: There are many ways to measure platelet aggregability. Little is known about their correlations with one another, or with bleeding. METHODS: We prospectively studied 50 patients undergoing a first isolated off-pump CABG. Thirty-four were exposed to a thienopyridine prior to surgery; 16 were not. Preoperative platelet function was measured by VerifyNow®, TEG®, AggreGuide™, Plateletworks®, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation, and light transmission aggregometry. Bleeding was assessed 2 ways: drop from pre- to nadir postoperative hematocrit, and chest tube drainage. Correlation coefficients were calculated using Spearman's rank-order correlation. RESULTS: Mean age was 62 years. Patient characteristics and surgical details were similar between the thienopyridine-exposed and non-exposed patients. The correlation coefficients between the 4 point-of-care platelet function measurements and hematocrit change ranged from -0.2274 to 0.2882. Only Plateletworks® correlated with drop in hematocrit (r = 0.2882, P = 0.0470). The correlation coefficients between each of the 4 point-of-care platelet function tests and the chest tube drainage were also poor, ranging from -0.3073 to 0.2272. Both AggreGuide™ (r = -0.3073, P = 0.0317) and VASP (r = -0.3187, P = 0.0272) were weakly but significantly correlated with chest tube drainage. The correlation among the 4 point-of-care platelet function measurements was poor, with coefficients ranging from -0.2504 to 0.1968. CONCLUSIONS: We observed little correlation among 4 platelet function tests, and between those assays and perioperative bleeding defined 2 different ways. Whether any of these assays should be used to guide decision making in individual patients is unclear.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas de Coagulación Sanguínea , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Puente de Arteria Coronaria Off-Pump , Agregación Plaquetaria , Anciano , Tubos Torácicos , Drenaje , Femenino , Hematócrito , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Periodo Preoperatorio , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA