Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 28
Filtrar
1.
Am J Addict ; 31(2): 115-122, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35037334

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Physician health programs (PHPs) have demonstrated efficacy, but their mechanism of influence is unclear. This study sought to identify essential components of PHP care management for substance use disorder (SUD), and to assess whether positive outcomes are sustained over time. METHODS: Physicians with DSM-IV diagnoses of Substance Dependence and/or Substance Abuse who had successfully completed a PHP monitoring agreement at least 5 years before the study (N = 343) were identified as eligible. Of the 143 (42%) that could be reached by phone, 93% (n = 133; 86% male) completed the anonymous online survey. RESULTS: Virtually all PHP program components were rated as being at least "somewhat helpful" in promoting recovery, with the plurality of respondents rating almost all components as "extremely helpful." The top-rated components were: signing a PHP monitoring agreement, participation in the PHP, formal SUD treatment, and attending 12-step meetings, with each receiving a mean rating of at least 6.2 out of 7. Notably, 88% of respondents endorsed continued participation in 12-step fellowships. Despite the significant financial burden of PHP participation, 85% of respondents reported they believed the total financial cost of PHP participation was "money well spent." DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Components of PHP monitoring were viewed as acceptable and helpful to physicians who completed the program, and outcomes were generally sustained over 5 years. More studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: This study documents the perceived cost-benefit of participation in a PHP among a small sample of program completers.


Asunto(s)
Médicos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Médicos/psicología , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
J Psychoactive Drugs ; 52(3): 195-202, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32156222

RESUMEN

The prevalence rate of addiction among physicians is similar to the general population, with approximately 10% to 12% of U.S.-based physicians developing substance use disorders (SUDs) during their lifetimes. To address this public health concern, physician health programs (PHPs) have been created to facilitate the early identification, evaluation, treatment, and monitoring of physicians. Although a number of published studies provide outcome information from PHPs, there has been no comprehensive review of the related literature. The objective of this narrative review is to summarize the treatment outcomes, including treatment types, rates of relapse, rates of contract completion or extension, as well as licensure and work status rates of a nationally representative physician cohort and related subpopulations from a single dataset. Based on the studies included in this review, our findings reveal that physicians who completed their PHP contracts have more favorable treatment outcomes than members of the general population who receive mainstream treatment. In addition, our review describes unique features of physician rehabilitation facilitated by PHPs. However, further prospective research is needed to ensure a standardized and comparable dataset and facilitate performance improvement.


Asunto(s)
Inhabilitación Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Detección de Abuso de Sustancias , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
J Addict Med ; 11(2): 93-97, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28067757

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: There is little published evidence on how well family medicine physicians (FMPs) with substance use disorder (SUD) perform in Physician Health Programs (PHPs). We examined outcomes for FMP compared with non-FMP physicians. METHODS: This study utilized data from a 5-year, longitudinal, cohort study involving 904 physicians with diagnoses of SUD consecutively admitted to one of 16 state PHPs between 1995 and 2001. We compared 175 FMPs to 687 other physicians. Outcome measures were relapse, successful completion of monitoring contract at 5 years, and licensed and employed at 5 years. RESULTS: Of the 3 outcome variables measured: relapse, successful completion of monitoring contract at 5 years, and licensed and employed at 5 years, FMPs had similar rates of success on all variables except monitoring contract completion at 5 years when compared with the other physician cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, FMPs with SUD do as well as other physicians in PHPs at 5 years. However, FMPs were less likely to complete the monitoring contract at 5 years as compared to the other physician cohort.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Inhabilitación Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos de Familia/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia
4.
J Subst Abuse Treat ; 64: 47-54, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26971079

RESUMEN

AIMS: To compare treatment outcome among substance dependent physicians enrolled in a physician health program (PHP) who have a history of alcohol use only, any opioid use, or non-opioid drug use, in order to determine whether the distinctive PHP system of care management is as effective for individuals with opioid use disorders as for those with alcohol or other drug use disorders. METHODS: A 5-year, retrospective chart review, intent-to-treat analysis was conducted for all physicians admitted to 16 physician health programs (N=702; 85.5% male; age range=24-75). Analyses compared treatment outcomes for participants based upon their substance(s) of abuse [i.e., 1) "Alcohol Only" (n=204), 2) "Any Opioid" with or without alcohol use (n=339), and 3) "Non-Opioid" drug use with or without alcohol use (n=159)]. RESULTS: In this sample, 75-80% of physicians across the three groups never tested positive for alcohol or drugs during their extended care management period with random drug testing. This included physicians with opioid dependence who did not receive opioid substitution therapy (OST). Of the 22.1% of physicians who had a positive test, two thirds (i.e., 14.5% of the total sample) had just one positive test, and only one third (i.e., 7.6% of the total sample) had more than one positive test. These results were similar in all three groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that individuals with opioid use disorders who are managed by PHPs can achieve long-term abstinence from opioids, alcohol, and other drugs without OST through participation in abstinence-based psychosocial treatment with extended, intensive care management following discharge.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud del Trabajador/normas , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/terapia , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Médicos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Servicios de Salud del Trabajador/organización & administración , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Tratamiento de Abuso de Sustancias , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
7.
8.
Psychiatr Serv ; 65(12): 1492-5, 2014 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25270988

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of psychiatrists and nonpsychiatrist physicians enrolled in state physician health programs for substance use disorders. METHODS: The study used the data set from a five-year, longitudinal cohort study of 904 physicians, including 55 psychiatrists, with diagnoses of substance abuse or dependence consecutively admitted to one of 16 state physician health programs between 1995 and 2001. RESULTS: There was a higher proportion of women among psychiatrists than among other physicians, but there were no other significant differences between the cohorts. Five-year outcomes were similar between psychiatrists and the other physicians, with at least 75% of psychiatrists continuing their medical practice after five years of monitoring and treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatrists were not overrepresented compared with other physician groups and had similar clinical outcomes at the five-year follow-up. Physician health programs appeared to be effective treatment programs for psychiatrists with substance use disorders.


Asunto(s)
Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Psiquiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhabilitación Médica/psicología , Inhabilitación Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Sexuales , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/rehabilitación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
9.
Psychiatr Danub ; 26(1): 56-65, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24608153

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of cannabis use among Swiss students and to assess their attitudes regarding health and safety issues associated with drug use. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: After a workshop, 173 students (23.1% male, 75.7% female; 44.4% age 16, 43.8% age 17 and 11.8% age 18) from a Swiss school were surveyed by questionnaire. RESULTS: 59.3% (n=103) of all participants had tried cannabis, and 30.1% of those who reported cannabis use had consumed more than 100 joints. Of those 103 students with cannabis experience, 6.8% rated the risk of cannabis-related psychic effects as low, and 9.8% were not concerned about driving under the influence of cannabis. In cases of heavy cannabis use, the chance of increased tobacco, alcohol or other drug use is higher than for those with less or no cannabis use at all (odds ratios of 4.33-10.86). CONCLUSIONS: This paper deals primarily with cannabis prevalence data in adolescents from previous studies and sources, and shows that our findings deviate significantly - and surprisingly - from past research. Our data from a school survey indicates higher cannabis use than data from official drug policy studies. Additionally, our data shows that the students' self-reported attitudes towards health and safety issues were mostly realistic. The examination of methodological issues that might impact prevalence estimates should be added to the cannabis literature.

10.
Eur Addict Res ; 20(3): 137-42, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24335415

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Monitoring alcohol use is important in numerous situations. Direct ethanol metabolites, such as ethyl glucuronide (EtG), have been shown to be useful tools in detecting alcohol use and documenting abstinence. For very frequent or continuous control of abstinence, they lack practicability. Therefore, devices measuring ethanol itself might be of interest. This pilot study aims at elucidating the usability and accuracy of the cellular photo digital breathalyzer (CPDB) compared to self-reports in a naturalistic setting. METHOD: 12 social drinkers were included. Subjects used a CPDB 4 times daily, kept diaries of alcohol use and submitted urine for EtG testing over a period of 5 weeks. RESULTS: In total, the 12 subjects reported 84 drinking episodes. 1,609 breath tests were performed and 55 urine EtG tests were collected. Of 84 drinking episodes, CPDB detected 98.8%. The compliance rate for breath testing was 96%. Of the 55 EtG tests submitted, 1 (1.8%) was positive. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that the CPDB device holds promise in detecting high, moderate, and low alcohol intake. It seems to have advantages compared to biomarkers and other monitoring devices. The preference for CPDB by the participants might explain the high compliance. Further studies including comparison with biomarkers and transdermal devices are needed.


Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas , Pruebas Respiratorias/instrumentación , Adulto , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/orina , Biomarcadores/orina , Femenino , Glucuronatos/orina , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Autoinforme , Adulto Joven
12.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 35(5): 561-4, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23835083

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Surveys assessing alcohol use among physicians have most commonly employed the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) or the AUDIT-C, the most common short version of the AUDIT. As with other screeners, prevalence estimation is dependent on the accuracy of the test as well as choice of the cutoff value. The aim of the current study is to derive more precise prevalence estimates of alcohol problems in physicians by correcting for false-positive and false-negative results. METHOD: In the context of a survey, the AUDIT was sent out via email or standard postal service to all 2484 physicians in Salzburg, Austria. A total of 456 physicians participated. A published correction formula was used to estimate the real prevalence of alcohol use problems. RESULTS: Applying a cutoff of 5 points for the AUDIT-C, 15.7% of female and 37.7% of male physicians screened positive. Use of a correction based on general population data and the sensitivity and specificity of the AUDIT-C resulted in much lower prevalence rates: 4.0% for female and 9.5% for male physicians. Using the full AUDIT, 19.6% of the female physicians and 48% of the male physicians were screened positive. Using the correction, the estimated prevalence rates for females and males were 6.3% and 15.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that uncorrected screening results may markedly overestimate the prevalence of physicians drinking problems.


Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo/epidemiología , Inhabilitación Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhabilitación Médica/psicología , Prevalencia , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica/normas , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Factores Sexuales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Adulto Joven
13.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res ; 37(9): 1582-6, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23731162

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Whereas urinary ethyl glucuronide (EtG) levels above 1,000 ng/ml reflect with a high probability ethanol (EtOH) consumption, levels below this cutoff are difficult to interpret as both extraneous (nonbeverage) EtOH exposure, recent drinking, and more distant high EtOH intake (several days ago) might yield similar results. This might be of particular relevance in medico-legal cases. To overcome this dilemma, phosphatidylethanol (PEth) might be a promising marker, because blood PEth is only positive following significant alcohol use. The aim of our study was therefore to employ PEth as a marker to differentiate between the different conditions. METHODS: Subjects included were 252 participants in monitoring with the Alabama Physician Health Program. All subjects testing positive for EtG and/or ethyl sulfate (EtS) who denied drinking after routine supportive confrontation were subject to information about PEth testing. If they still denied drinking, PEth testing was performed and the result communicated. EtG, EtS, and PEth testing was performed in a commercial laboratory using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry methods. RESULTS: Of a total of 18 subjects who tested positive for EtG and/or EtS, 10 denied drinking. Of the 7 who denied drinking after PEth explanation, in 5 cases, their claim was supported by a negative PEth result. In 2 cases, a positive PEth result was in contrast to their claim. CONCLUSIONS: PEth results in combination with previous low positive EtG/EtS results allow differentiating between innocent/extraneous exposure and drinking. Negative PEth testing following low positive EtG/EtS results helps to further elucidate the findings and support the claim of the patient of recent alcohol abstinence. Positive PEth testing following positive EtG/EtS results confirms recent drinking.


Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/sangre , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/orina , Glucuronatos/orina , Glicerofosfolípidos/sangre , Ésteres del Ácido Sulfúrico/orina , Alabama/epidemiología , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Biomarcadores/sangre , Biomarcadores/orina , Femenino , Glucuronatos/sangre , Glicerofosfolípidos/orina , Humanos , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Ésteres del Ácido Sulfúrico/sangre
16.
J Psychoactive Drugs ; 44(1): 72-8, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22641968

RESUMEN

The success of the nation's state physician health programs (PHPs) provides important new evidence on the potential for dramatically reducing relapse and promoting long-term recovery from substance use disorders. This article summarizes the findings of the first national PHP study and outlines six lessons learned from this model of care management: (1) zero tolerance for any use of alcohol and other drugs; (2) thorough evaluation and patient-focused care; (3) prolonged, frequent random testing for both alcohol and other drugs; (4) effective use of leverage; (5) defining and managing relapses; and (6) the goal of lifelong recovery rooted in the 12-Step fellowships. PHPs are a part of a new paradigm of care management that includes the programs developed for commercial pilots (HIMS) and for attorneys (CoLAP). Elements of this model of care have been used with a dramatically different patient population, and with similar success, in the criminal justice system in HOPE Probation and 24/7 Sobriety. The authors review these programs and discuss implications for extending elements of the new paradigm more widely.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Derecho Penal , Humanos , Manejo de Atención al Paciente , Médicos
18.
J Vet Med Educ ; 39(1): 79-82, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22433743

RESUMEN

A high suicide risk has been reported among veterinarians in comparison to the general population. Postulated causes have included depression, substance abuse, work-related stress, reluctance to admit psychiatric problems, and access to lethal drugs and/or familiarity with euthanasia. Members of the Student Chapter of the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA), all veterinarians licensed in Alabama, and all US veterinary-association executive directors were surveyed regarding their attitudes concerning mental health issues, including veterinarian suicide. Only 10% of veterinary student respondents (N=58) believed that suicide risk is higher among veterinarians than in the general population. Of the 22 state associations' executive directors who participated in the survey, 37% believed that suicide is a significant concern for veterinarians and only 44% indicated that a veterinary wellness program was available in their respective states. Of the 1,455 licensed veterinarians in Alabama, 701 responded to the survey; 11% of respondents believed that suicide among veterinarians was a problem. In addition, 66% of respondents indicated that they had been "clinically depressed," but 32% of those with depression had not sought treatment. More females (27%) than males (20%) admitted that they had "seriously considered suicide" (p<.01). Female veterinarians were more likely than male veterinarians (15% versus 7%) to indicate that they were "not sure they'd made the right career choice" (p<.001), and 4% of all respondents indicated "definitely not being happy with their career." It is of concern that veterinarians not only have a higher risk of suicide but that they also have fewer support structures. The wide discrepancies between the published risk of suicide for veterinarians and their own views of their risk suggests an inadequate awareness of their own mental health vulnerability which could put them at higher risk.


Asunto(s)
Estudiantes del Área de la Salud/psicología , Estudiantes del Área de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Ideación Suicida , Veterinarios/psicología , Veterinarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Alabama/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Sociedades , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
20.
Anesth Analg ; 109(3): 891-6, 2009 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19690263

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anesthesiologists have a higher rate of substance use disorders than other physicians, and their prognoses and advisability to return to anesthesiology practice after treatment remain controversial. Over the past 25 yr, physician health programs (PHPs), created under authority of state medical regulatory boards, have become primary resources for management and monitoring of physicians with substance abuse and other mental health disorders. METHODS: We conducted a 5-yr, longitudinal, cohort study involving 904 physicians consecutively admitted to 1 of 16 state PHPs between 1995 and 2001. This report analyzed a subset of the data involving the 102 anesthesiologists among the subjects and compared them with other physicians. The main outcome measures included relapse (defined as any unauthorized addictive substance use, including alcohol), return to anesthesiology practice, disciplinary actions, physician death, and patient harm. RESULTS: Anesthesiologists were significantly less likely to enroll in a PHP because of alcohol abuse (odds ratio [OR] 0.4 [confidence interval {CI}: 0.2-0.6], P < 0.001) and much more likely to enroll because of opioid abuse (OR 2.8 [CI: 1.7-4.4], P < 0.001). Anesthesiologists had a higher rate of IV drug use, 41% vs 10% (OR 6.3 [CI: 3.8-10.7], P < 0.001). During similar periods of monitoring, anesthesiologists received more drug tests, 101 vs 82 (mean difference = 19 [CI: 3-35], P = 0.02); however, anesthesiologists were less likely to fail at least one drug test during monitoring, 11% vs 23% (OR 0.4 [CI: 0.2-0.9], P = 0.02). There was no statistical difference among rates of program completion, disciplinary actions, return to practice, or deaths, and there was no report of significant patient harm from relapse in any record. CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesiologists in our sample treated and monitored for substance disorders under supervision of PHPs had excellent outcomes similar to other physicians, with no higher mortality, relapse rate, or disciplinary rate and no evidence in their records of patient harm. It is postulated that differences of study design account for contradictory conclusions from other reports.


Asunto(s)
Anestesiología/normas , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/rehabilitación , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Recursos Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...