The value of ultrasound in the assessment of cervical and abdominal lymph node metastases and selecting surgical strategy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus treated with neoadjuvant therapy.

PURPOSE: To establish the role of ultrasound (US) in the assessment of cervical and abdominal lymph node metastases and its impact on making decision about surgical strategy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. MATERIAL/METHODS: The results of US lymph node assessment before and after a neoadjuvant treatment in 83 patients were compared with the results of histopathological evaluation of lymph nodes harvested during surgery (transthoracic esophagectomy and 2-field extended or 3-field lymph node dissection). A diagnostic value of cervical and abdominal US in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value after a neoadjuvant treatment were determined. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the US assessment of cervical lymph node metastases were 100%, 96%, 81% and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the US assessment of abdominal lymph node metastases were 82%, 94%, 91.5% and 87%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The high sensitivity and specificity of cervical US make this investigational method sufficient in the assessment of cervical nodal involvement. In esophageal cancer patients with negative cervical lymph nodes on US, three-field lymph node dissection could be avoided. In patients with positive cervical lymph nodes on US one should consider to extend lymph node dissection about lymph nodes of the neck to achieve a curative resection. In patients with negative abdominal US this investigation should be supplemented by more detailed diagnostic methods.

Significant enhancement of gastric mucin content after rabeprazole administration: its potential clinical significance in acid-related disorders.

Rabeprazole is the only proton pump inhibitor that enhances the content of gastric mucin in experimental animals. We have studied, therefore, the effect of rabeprazole on the content of gastric mucin, mucus, and its viscosity in 21 asymptomatic volunteers in a double-blind study. The mucus content during rabeprazole administration significantly increased both in pentagastrin-stimulated (3.36 +/- 0.39 vs 1.50 +/- 0.32 mg/ml, P < 0.001) and basal (3.31 +/- 0.38 vs 2.28 +/- 0.36 mg/ml, P < 0.01) conditions. The content of mucin during rabeprazole was 2.6-fold (0.96 +/- 0.08 vs 0.36 +/- 0.06 mg/ml, P < 0.0001) and 41% (0.82 +/- 0.09 vs 0.58 +/- 0.09 mg/ml, P < 0.05) higher in stimulated and basal conditions, respectively. The viscosity of gastric juice during rabeprazole administration was also significantly higher both in stimulated (P < 0.01) and basal (P < 0.05) conditions. In conclusion, the unique pharmacological property of rabeprazole, significantly augmenting production of gastric mucus and mucin, may translate to additional clinical benefits in protecting the upper alimentary tract mucosa during the acid-related challenge.

Esophageal motility impairment--the cause or consequence of gastroesophageal reflux disease?

There are at least three, well-known, different groups of motor activity disturbances of the upper part of alimentary tract which can induce the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and enlarge the risk of excessive exposure of the esophageal mucous membrane on gastric juice and/or biliary contents. Most important is insufficiency of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), which causes gastroesophageal reflux at 50-60% of patients suffering from GERD. Other reasons include impairment of stomach function (increase of intra-gastric pressure, late emptying and/or hypersecretion), and impairment of esophageal clearance. The question: does motility impairment of the esophagus occur primary or secondary to the gastroesophageal reflux, is still not enough clarified. Motor activity of the esophagus before and after the antireflux operation was prospectively assessed in 57 patients. Motility of the esophagus was determined by estimation: the efficacy of LES, general motor activity of the body of the esophagus and motor activity of the body during the reflux episodes, basing on 24-h manometry. Comparison of general pre- and postoperative data revealed significantly positive influence of Nissen-Rossetti fundoplication on improvement of motor activity of the esophagus, but the results differed in relation to the height of the measurements. Moreover comparison of the data during gastroesophageal reflux episodes revealed negative changes of the manometric parameters in the upper and middle esophagus. We conclude that post-operative improvement of esophageal motility confirms the secondary dysfunction in the peristalsis, connected with pathological reflux. However, lack of the complete normalization in motor activity after operation suggests that disorder may partially occur as primary impairment of motor activity or as the secondary dysfunction, which is fixed in the course of GERD.