Ready, set, go! Evaluating readiness to implement competency-based medical education.

PURPOSE: Organizational readiness is critical for successful implementation of an innovation. We evaluated program readiness to implement Competence by Design (CBD), a model of Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME), among Canadian postgraduate training programs. METHODS: A survey of program directors was distributed 1 month prior to CBD implementation in 2019. Questions were informed by the R = MC2 framework of organizational readiness and addressed: program motivation, general capacity for change, and innovation-specific capacity. An overall readiness score was calculated. An ANOVA was conducted to compare overall readiness between disciplines. RESULTS: Survey response rate was 42% (n = 79). The mean overall readiness score was 74% (30-98%). There was no difference in scores between disciplines. The majority of respondents agreed that successful implementation of CBD was a priority (74%), and that their leadership (94%) and faculty and residents (87%) were supportive of change. Fewer perceived that CBD was a move in the right direction (58%) and that implementation was a manageable change (53%). Curriculum mapping, competence committees and programmatic assessment activities were completed by >90% of programs, while <50% had engaged off-service disciplines. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights important areas where programs excelled in their preparation for CBD, as well as common challenges that serve as targets for future intervention to improve program readiness for CBD implementation.

Implementation of competence committees during the transition to CBME in Canada: A national fidelity-focused evaluation.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the fidelity of competence committee (CC) implementation in Canadian postgraduate specialist training programs during the transition to competency-based medical education (CBME). METHODS: A national survey of CC chairs was distributed to all CBME training programs in November 2019. Survey questions were derived from guiding documents published by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada reflecting intended processes and design. RESULTS: Response rate was 39% (113/293) with representation from all eligible disciplines. Committee size ranged from 3 to 20 members, 42% of programs included external members, and 20% included a resident representative. Most programs (72%) reported that a primary review and synthesis of resident assessment data occurs prior to the meeting, with some data reviewed collectively during meetings. When determining entrustable professional activity (EPA) achievement, most programs followed the national specialty guidelines closely with some exceptions (53%). Documented concerns about professionalism, EPA narrative comments, and EPA entrustment scores were most highly weighted when determining resident progress decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneity in CC implementation likely reflects local adaptations, but may also explain some of the variable challenges faced by programs during the transition to CBME. Our results offer educational leaders important fidelity data that can help inform the larger evaluation and transformation of CBME.