Utility of an Automated Radiology-Pathology Feedback Tool.

PURPOSE: To determine the utility of an automated radiology-pathology feedback tool. METHODS: We previously developed a tool that automatically provides radiologists with pathology results related to imaging examinations they interpreted. The tool also allows radiologists to mark the results as concordant or discordant. Five abdominal radiologists prospectively scored their own discordant results related to their previously interpreted abdominal ultrasound, CT, and MR interpretations between August 2017 and June 2018. Radiologists recorded whether they would have followed up on the case if there was no automated alert, reason for the discordance, whether the result required further action, prompted imaging rereview, influenced future interpretations, enhanced teaching files, or inspired a research idea. RESULTS: There were 234 total discordances (range 30-66 per radiologist), and 70.5% (165 of 234) of discordances would not have been manually followed up in the absence of the automated tool. Reasons for discordances included missed findings (10.7%; 25 of 234), misinterpreted findings (29.1%; 68 of 234), possible biopsy sampling error (13.3%; 31 of 234), and limitations of imaging techniques (32.1%; 75/234). In addition, 4.7% (11 of 234) required further radiologist action, including report addenda or discussion with referrer or pathologist, and 93.2% (218 of 234) prompted radiologists to rereview the images. Radiologists reported that they learned from 88% (206 of 234) of discordances, 38.6% (90 of 233) of discordances probably or definitely influenced future interpretations, 55.6% (130 of 234) of discordances prompted the radiologist to add the case to his or her teaching files, and 13.7% (32 of 233) inspired a research idea. CONCLUSION: Automated pathology feedback provides a valuable opportunity for radiologists across experience levels to learn, increase their skill, and improve patient care.

Frequency and relevance of the "small-bowel feces" sign on CT in patients with small-bowel obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the incidence of the "small-bowel feces" sign (SBFS) in patients with small-bowel obstruction (SBO) and whether it can be used to accurately locate the point of obstruction. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: From November 2002 until March 2003, 34 consecutive adult patients with CT findings of small-bowel obstruction were prospectively evaluated. The CT findings used to diagnose small-bowel obstruction were a dilated proximal small bowel and a collapsed distal small bowel and colon. CT scans were evaluated to determine the degree of obstruction (mild, moderate, or high-grade), the presence or absence of the SBFS (defined as particulate-type material in the dilated small bowel), the location of the SBFS in relation to the transition zone, and the cause of the obstruction. Mild obstruction was defined as a slight discrepancy between the caliber of the proximal and that of the distal small bowel; moderate SBO was defined as a discrepancy of 50% or more between the calibers of the proximal and the distal small bowel; and high-grade SBO was considered to be present if the distal small bowel and the colon had collapsed. The cause of the obstruction was determined from surgical findings or a combination of CT findings, follow-up barium studies, and clinical assessment. RESULTS: The SBFS was present in 19 (55.9%) of 34 patients with SBO. The degree of SBO was mild in six, moderate in 11, and high-grade in 17 of the patients. The SBFS was present in one of the six patients (16.6%) with mild, eight (72.7%) of the 11 with moderate, and 10 (58.8%) of the 17 with high-grade SBO. In all patients in whom the SBFS was present, the particulate material could be traced to the point of transition and was most conspicuous in the transition zone. The length of fecallike material ranged from 2 to 25 cm and was longer in moderate and high-grade SBO than in mild SBO. The cause of the SBO was an adhesion in 20 patients, a hernia in four patients, Crohn's disease in four patients, a tumor in three patients, and other miscellaneous causes in three patients. CONCLUSION: When present on CT, the SBFS can be used to help locate the transition zone in patients with SBO. The sign is present more frequently in patients with moderate and high degrees of SBO.