Ocular cicatricial pemphigoid: is there an association with autoimmune diseases?

PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence of autoimmune diseases (ADs) associated with ocular cicatricial pemphigoid (OCP) and analyze clinical, laboratory, and treatment associations between these entities. METHODS: A multicentre cross-sectional study of patients with an OCP diagnosis. The population was divided into two groups according to their association with other ADs or not. Clinical, laboratory and treatment variables were described and compared between groups. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables that could suggest the association between OCP and ADs. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were recruited, with a mean age at diagnosis of 64.3 years (SD 11.9). Biopsy was performed in 86.8% of the patients. There was a median delay of 2 years from the onset of symptoms to diagnosis. Extraocular involvement was evidenced in 11.5%. The group associated with ADs included 24 patients (27.3%). The most prevalent diagnosis was Sjögren´s syndrome. Hypergammaglobulinemia was associated with ADs and OCP, adjusted for age, sex, smoking, skin and mucosal involvement, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (OR 8.7; 95%CI 1.6-46.8; p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Due to OCP's autoimmune nature, it could coexist with other ADs. This study observed that more than a quarter of the population presented with this association, and hypergammaglobulinemia could suggest it.

Penfigoide ocular cicatricial: ¿metotrexato como tratamiento de inicio? / Ocular Cicatricial Pemphigoid: Methotrexate as an Initial Treatment?

Objetivo: Analizar los datos clínicos/epidemiológicos, el manejo y los tratamientos instaurados a pacientes con penfigoide ocular cicatricial en un Servicio de Reumatología. Material y métodos: Revisión de historias clínicas de pacientes con penfigoide ocular cicatricial derivados por oftalmología entre 2008 y 2019. Resultados: En nuestra serie de 27 pacientes, el 67% fue diagnosticado y derivado en los últimos 2 años. La mayoría en estadio 1 de Foster. El 18,5% presentó síndrome de Sjogren asociado, conllevando una evolución desfavorable. El 88,8% recibió metotrexato, el 74% lo utilizó en monoterapia y el 66% continuó el tratamiento hasta el final. El 18,5% debió combinar/rotar terapias, los fármacos utilizados fueron micofenolato, azatioprina, ciclofosfamida, sirolimus, rituximab. El 29% utilizó esteroides. Solo en 2 ojos progresó el estadio. No se registraron eventos adversos serios y el 37% presentó eventos adversos leves. Conclusión: El inicio temprano de la terapia inmunosupresora es fundamental, siendo el metotrexato una buena alternativa como tratamiento de inicio según nuestra experiencia, debiendo escalar el tratamiento de acuerdo a la evolución.(AU)

Objective: To analyse the clinical / epidemiological data, the management and the treatments established in patients with ocular cicatricial pemphigoid in a Rheumatology Service. Material and methods: Review of clinical histories of patients with ocular cicatricial pemphigoid referred by ophthalmology between 2008 and 2019. Results: In our series of 27 patients, 67% were diagnosed and referred in the last 2 years. Most in Foster stage 1. Of the patients, 18.5% presented associated Sjogren's syndrome, with poor progression: 88.8% received Methotrexate, 74% used it as monotherapy and 66% continued with said treatment up to the end. Eighteen point five percent had to combine or rotate therapies, the drugs used were mycophenolate, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, sirolimus, etanercept, rituximab: 29% used steroids. Only in 2 eyes was stage progression observed. There were no serious adverse events, and 37% had mild adverse events. Conclusion: Starting immunosuppressive therapy early is essential, methotrexate being a good initial alternative in our experience, and treatment must be escalated in line with disease progression.(AU)

Ocular cicatricial pemphigoid: Methotrexate as an initial treatment?

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the clinical/epidemiological data, the management and the treatments established in patients with Ocular Cicatricial Pemphigoid (OCP) in a Rheumatology Service. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Review of clinical histories of patients with OCP referred by ophthalmology between 2008 and 2019. RESULTS: In our series of 27 patients, 67% were diagnosed and referred in the last 2 years. Most in Foster stage 1. Of the patients, 18.5% presented associated Sjogren's syndrome, with poor progression: 88.8% received Methotrexate, 74% used it as monotherapy and 66% continued with said treatment up to the end. Eighteen point five percent had to combine or rotate therapies, the drugs used were mycophenolate, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, sirolimus, etanercept, rituximab: 29% used steroids. Only in 2 eyes was stage progression observed. There were no serious adverse events, and 37% had mild adverse events. CONCLUSION: Starting immunosuppressive therapy early is essential, methotrexate being a good initial alternative in our experience, and treatment must be escalated in line with disease progression.

Ocular Cicatricial Pemphigoid: Methotrexate as an Initial Treatment? / Penfigoide ocular cicatricial: ¿metotrexato como tratamiento de inicio?

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the clinical / epidemiological data, the management and the treatments established in patients with ocular cicatricial pemphigoid in a Rheumatology Service. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Review of clinical histories of patients with ocular cicatricial pemphigoid referred by ophthalmology between 2008 and 2019. RESULTS: In our series of 27 patients, 67% were diagnosed and referred in the last 2 years. Most in Foster stage 1. Of the patients, 18.5% presented associated Sjogren's syndrome, with poor progression: 88.8% received Methotrexate, 74% used it as monotherapy and 66% continued with said treatment up to the end. Eighteen point five percent had to combine or rotate therapies, the drugs used were mycophenolate, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, sirolimus, etanercept, rituximab: 29% used steroids. Only in 2 eyes was stage progression observed. There were no serious adverse events, and 37% had mild adverse events. CONCLUSION: Starting immunosuppressive therapy early is essential, methotrexate being a good initial alternative in our experience, and treatment must be escalated in line with disease progression.

Asociación entre Artritis Reumatoidea y otras enfermedades autoinmunes / Association between Rheumatoid Arthritis and other autoimmune diseases

Objetivos: Determinar la frecuencia de enfermedades autoinmunes (EAI) en pacientes con Artritis Reumatoidea (AR) y comparar la frecuencia de EAI entre pacientes con AR y sin AR ni otra EAI reumatológica. Material y Métodos: Estudio multicéntrico, observacional, analítico, retrospectivo. Se incluyeron pacientes consecutivos con AR (ACR/EULAR 2010) y como grupo control pacientes con diagnóstico inicial de Osteoartritis primaria (OA). Resultados: Se incluyeron 1549 pacientes: 831 con AR (84% mujeres, edad media 55.2 años [DE 13.6]) y 718 con OA (82% mujeres, edad media 67 años [DE 11.1]). La frecuencia de EAI en el grupo AR fue del 22% (n=183). Estos presentaron mayor frecuencia de EAI reumatológicas (9.4 vs 3.3%, p< 0.001), y menor frecuencia de EAI no reumatológicas que aquellos con OA (15.3 vs 20.5, p=0.007). La EAI reumatológica más prevalente fue el Síndrome de Sjögren, el cual fue más frecuente en el grupo AR (87.2 vs 29.2%, p< 0,001). La frecuencia de EAI reumatológicas en los pacientes con AR fue mayor en la forma erosiva (11 vs 6.8%, p=0.048). Conclusión: La frecuencia de EAI en los pacientes con AR fue del 22%, en quienes predominaron las de etiología reumatológica mientras que, las no reumatológicas predominaron en pacientes con OA.

Objectives: To determine the frequency of autoimmune diseases (AID) in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients and to compare this frequency between patients with and without RA or other rheumatologic AID. Methods: Multicenter, observational, analytical, retrospective study. Consecutive patients with diagnosis of RA (ACR/EULAR 2010) were included. Patients with initial diagnosis of primary ostearthritis (OA) were used as control group. Results: A total of 1549 patients were included: 831 RA (84% women, mean age 55.2 [±13.6]) and 718 OA (82% women, mean age 67 [± 11.1]). The frequency of AID in the RA group was 22% (n=183). RA patients showed higher frequency of rheumatologic AID (9.4 vs 3.3%, p< 0.001), and lower frequency of non-rheumatologic AID than OA patients (15.3 vs 20.5%, p= 0.007). The most prevalent rheumatic AID was Sjögren's Syndrome, which was more frequent in the AR group (87.2 vs 29.2%, p<0.001). The frequency of rheumatologic AID in RA patients was higher in those with erosive RA (11 vs 6.8%, p=0.048). Conclusion: The frequency of AID in RA patients was 22%. Rheumatologic AID were more frequent in RA patients, whereas non-rheumatologic AID prevailed in OA patients.

Changing rate of serious infections in biologic-exposed rheumatoid arthritis patients. Data from South American registries BIOBADABRASIL and BIOBADASAR.

OBJECTIVE: Most reports on serious infections (SI) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are from the USA and Western Europe. Data from other regions are largely missing. We report data from South American countries with different backgrounds and health-care systems but similar registries. METHODS: We merged 2010-2016 data from two registries, BIOBADABRASIL (Brazil) and BIOBADASAR (Argentina), which share the same protocol, online platform and data monitoring process. Patients with active RA were included when they began the first bDMARD or a conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD, control group). The SI incidence rate (IR) per 1000 patient/years and adjusted IR ratio (aIRR) were estimated for bDMARDs and csDMARDs. RESULTS: Data were analysed for 3717 RA patients with an exposure of 13,380 patient/years. The 2591 patients treated with bDMARDs (64% tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFi)) had a follow-up of 9300 years, and the 1126 treated with csDMARDs had an exposure of 4081 patient/years. The SI IR was 30.54 (CI 27.18-34.30) for all bDMARDs and 5.15 (CI 3.36-7.89) for csDMARDs. The aIRR between the two groups was 2.03 ([1.05, 3.9] p = 0.034) for the first 6 months of treatment but subsequently increased to 8.26 ([4.32, 15.76] p < 0.001). The SI IR for bDMARDs decreased over time in both registries, dropping from 36.59 (28.41-47.12) in 2012 to 7.27 (4.79-11.05) in 2016. CONCLUSION: While SI remains a major concern in South American patients with RA treated with bDMARDs, a favourable trend toward a reduction was observed in the last years.Key Points• New comprehensive data on biologic drugs safety from international collaboration in South America.• First proposal for national registries data merging in South America.• Serious infections remain a major concern in RA patients treated with biologics.• A significant reduction of serious infections in RA patients exposed to biologics was observed over a 7 years period.