Eliciting diverse perspectives to prioritize community actions for biodiversity conservation.

Communities have a strong role in protecting biodiversity. In addition to participation in restoration, a range of actions in the public or private sphere may support biodiversity. Despite this, there is a lack of clarity about what actions should be prioritized for behavior change campaigns. We developed and applied a method to prioritize community actions for biodiversity conservation that incorporates an expert-based assessment of impact and a community-informed measure of the likelihood of uptake. In stage 1, experts (n = 143) completed a survey that quantified the relative impact of actions based on best-worst scaling of perceived impact. In stage 2, surveyed community members (n = 3200) ranked the likelihood of adopting actions based on the ease or difficulty of performing each action, and the opportunity for change based on the proportion of respondents not yet engaging in each behavior. Experts gave the following actions the highest ranking for impact: voting for the environment (first), participating in restoration in ecological priority areas (second), and purchasing and protecting remnant bushland (third). When considering the disciplinary background and institutional background of experts, voting and participating in restoration activities remained in the upper ranked options. However, there was some divergence between these groups. For example, reducing beef consumption was ranked third by university-based experts but ranked 28th by experts based in state government. Overall, community members ranked the following behaviors as most likely to be adopted: following quarantine laws (first), reducing plastic use (second), and managing pets (third). Top likelihood ranking of actions was minimally affected by community characteristics (nature relatedness, gender, location). Integrating these findings, the action ranked most favorably for impact, likelihood, and opportunity was participating in restoration. Choosing actions for behavior change campaigns requires consideration of the entire social-ecological system-from social factors that enable or constrain adoption to the ecological impact of actions across relevant social and ecological contexts.

Inducción de perspectivas diversas para priorizar las acciones comunitarias a favor de la conservación de la biodiversidad Las comunidades juegan un papel importante en la protección de la biodiversidad. Además de participar en la restauración, existe una gama de acciones públicas y privadas que pueden ayudar a la biodiversidad. A pesar de esto, no está claro cuáles acciones deben priorizarse en las campañas de cambio conductual. Desarrollamos y aplicamos un método para priorizar las acciones comunitarias a favor de la conservación de la biodiversidad que incorpora la evaluación por experto del impacto y la medida comunitaria de la probabilidad de captación. En la fase 1, los expertos (n = 143) completaron una encuesta que cuantificó el impacto relativo de las acciones con base en una escala mejor­peor del impacto percibido. En la fase 2, los miembros de la comunidad (n = 3200) clasificaron la probabilidad del éxito de las acciones con base en la proporción de respondientes que todavía no participan en cada comportamiento. Los expertos otorgaron la clasificación más alta para el impacto a las siguientes acciones: votar por el ambiente (primero), participar en la restauración de áreas ecológicas prioritarias (segundo) y adquirir y proteger matorrales remanentes (tercero). Cuando consideramos la formación disciplinaria e institucional de los expertos, la votación y la participación en las actividades de restauración permanecieron en las opciones con clasificación más alta; sin embargo, existió una divergencia entre estos grupos. Por ejemplo, los expertos de las universidades clasificaron en tercero la reducción del consumo de carne de res, pero los expertos del gobierno estatal lo clasificaron en vigésimo octavo. En general, los miembros de la comunidad clasificaron los siguientes comportamientos como los más probables de ser adoptados: seguir las normas de cuarentena (primero), reducir el uso de plásticos (segundo) y el manejo de mascotas (tercero). Las características comunitarias (relación con la naturaleza, género, ubicación) afectaron en lo mínimo a la clasificación más alta de probabilidad de las acciones. Al integrar estos resultados, la acción mejor clasificada en cuanto a impacto, probabilidad y oportunidad fue la participación en la restauración. La selección de acciones para las campañas de cambio conductual requiere que se considere todo el sistema socio ecológico ­ desde los factores sociales que permiten o restringen la conservación hasta las acciones de impacto ecológico relevantes en los contextos sociales y ecológicos.

Institutional and behaviour-change interventions to support COVID-19 public health measures: a review by the Lancet Commission Task Force on public health measures to suppress the pandemic.

The Lancet COVID-19 Commission Task Force for Public Health Measures to Suppress the Pandemic was launched to identify critical points for consideration by governments on public health interventions to control coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Drawing on our review of published studies of data analytics and modelling, evidence synthesis and contextualisation, and behavioural science evidence and theory on public health interventions from a range of sources, we outline evidence for a range of institutional measures and behaviour-change measures. We cite examples of measures adopted by a range of countries, but especially jurisdictions that have, thus far, achieved low numbers of COVID-19 deaths and limited community transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Finally, we highlight gaps in knowledge where research should be undertaken. As countries consider long-term measures, there is an opportunity to learn, improve the response and prepare for future pandemics.

Understanding the biosecurity monitoring and reporting intentions of livestock producers: Identifying opportunities for behaviour change.

In many countries, government strategies for biosecurity planning and outbreaks depend upon private livestock producers being willing and able to conduct surveillance of their animals and the timely reporting of suspicious signs of disease. From a behavioural perspective, these two kinds of behaviours - surveillance and reporting - should be treated separately when developing a biosecurity plan in which producers play a key role in the prevention, detection, and reporting of animal diseases. Having an effective surveillance system in place is conceptually and practically independent of a reporting system that is both feasible and trustworthy. The behavioural intentions of 200 Australian producers to monitor their livestock and report to either the government or a private vet were measured in a structured telephone interview. Structural equation modelling revealed that these intentions had different statistical relationships with a common set of predictor variables. Moreover, classification of the producers based on belief about monitoring and surveillance resulted in three contrasting groups. These results are discussed in terms of their meaning for the development of behavioural strategies to promote surveillance and monitoring of animal disease.