Individuals with knee osteoarthritis show few limitations in balance recovery responses after moderate gait perturbations.

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis causes structural joint damage. The resultant symptoms can impair the ability to recover from unexpected gait perturbations. This study compared balance recovery responses to moderate gait perturbations between individuals with knee osteoarthritis and healthy individuals. METHODS: Kinematic data of 35 individuals with end-stage knee osteoarthritis, and 32 healthy individuals in the same age range were obtained during perturbed walking on a treadmill at 1.0 m/s. Participants received anteroposterior (acceleration or deceleration) or mediolateral perturbations during the stance phase. Changes from baseline in margin of stability, step length, step time, and step width during the first two steps after perturbation were compared between groups using a linear regression model. Extrapolated center of mass excursion was descriptively analyzed. FINDINGS: After all perturbation modes, extrapolated center of mass trajectories overlapped between individuals with knee osteoarthritis and healthy individuals. Participants predominantly responded to mediolateral perturbations by adjusting their step width, and to anteroposterior perturbations by adjusting step length and step time. None of the perturbation modes yielded between-group differences in changes in margin of stability and step width during the first two steps after perturbation. Small between-group differences were observed for step length (i.e. 2 cm) of the second step after mediolateral and anteroposterior perturbations, and for step time (i.e. 0.01-0.02 s) of first step after mediolateral perturbations and the second step after outward and belt acceleration perturbations. INTERPRETATION: Despite considerable pain and damage to the knee joint, individuals with knee osteoarthritis showed comparable balance recovery responses after moderate gait perturbations to healthy participants.

Objective gait assessment in individuals with knee osteoarthritis using inertial sensors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Objective assessment of gait using inertial sensors has shown promising results for functional evaluations in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, the large number of possible outcome measures calls for a systematic evaluation of most relevant parameters to be used for scientific and clinical purposes. AIM: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify gait parameters derived from inertial sensors that reflect gait deviations in individuals with knee OA compared to healthy control subjects (HC). METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in five electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, IEEE) to identify eligible articles. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified version of the Downs and Black scale. Data regarding study population, experimental procedures, and biomechanical outcomes were extracted. When a gait parameter was reported by a sufficient number of studies, a random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using the inverse variance method. RESULTS: Twenty-three articles comparing gait between 411 individuals with knee OA and 507 HC were included. Individuals with knee OA had a lower gait speed than HC (standardized mean difference = -1.65), driven by smaller strides with a longer duration. Stride time variability was slightly higher in individuals with knee OA than in HC. Individuals with knee OA walked with a lower range of motion of the knee during the swing phase, less lumbar motion in the coronal plane, and a lower foot strike and toe-off angle compared to HC. SIGNIFICANCE: This review shows that inertial sensors can detect gait impairments in individuals with knee OA. Large standardized mean differences found on spatiotemporal parameters support their applicability as sensitive endpoints for mobility in individuals with knee OA. More advanced measures, including kinematics of knee and trunk, may reveal gait adaptations that are more specific to knee OA, but compelling evidence was lacking.

Do cognitive measures and brain circuitry predict outcomes of exercise in Parkinson Disease: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: There is emerging research detailing the relationship between balance/gait/falls and cognition. Imaging studies also suggest a link between structural and functional changes in the frontal lobe (a region commonly associated with cognitive function) and mobility. People with Parkinson's disease have important changes in cognitive function that may impact rehabilitation efficacy. Our underlying hypothesis is that cognitive function and frontal lobe connections with the basal ganglia and brainstem posture/locomotor centers are responsible for postural deficits in people with Parkinson's disease and play a role in rehabilitation efficacy. The purpose of this study is to 1) determine if people with Parkinson's disease can improve mobility and/or cognition after partaking in a cognitively challenging mobility exercise program and 2) determine if cognition and brain circuitry deficits predict responsiveness to exercise rehabilitation. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is a randomized cross-over controlled intervention to take place at a University Balance Disorders Laboratory. The study participants will be people with Parkinson's disease who meet inclusion criteria for the study. The intervention will be 6 weeks of group exercise (case) and 6 weeks of group education (control). The exercise is a cognitively challenging program based on the Agility Boot Camp for people with PD. The education program is a 6-week program to teach people how to better live with a chronic disease. The primary outcome measure is the MiniBESTest and the secondary outcomes are measures of mobility, cognition and neural imaging. DISCUSSION: The results from this study will further our understanding of the relationship between cognition and mobility with a focus on brain circuitry as it relates to rehabilitation potential. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered at clinical trials.gov (NCT02231073).

Are postural responses to backward and forward perturbations processed by different neural circuits?

Startle pathways may contribute to rapid accomplishment of postural stability. Here we investigate the possible influence of a startling auditory stimulus (SAS) on postural responses. We formulated four specific questions: (1) can a concurrent SAS shorten the onset of automatic postural responses?; and if so (2) is this effect different for forward versus backward perturbations?; (3) does this effect depend on prior knowledge of the perturbation direction?; and (4) is this effect different for low- and high-magnitude perturbations? Balance was perturbed in 11 healthy participants by a movable platform that suddenly translated forward or backward. Each participant received 160 perturbations, 25% of which were combined with a SAS. We varied the direction and magnitude of the perturbations, as well as the prior knowledge of perturbation direction. Perturbation trials were interspersed with SAS-only trials. The SAS accelerated and strengthened postural responses with clear functional benefits (better balance control), but this was only true for responses that protected against falling backwards (i.e. in tibialis anterior and rectus femoris). These muscles also demonstrated the most common SAS-triggered responses without perturbation. Increasing the perturbation magnitude accelerated postural responses, but again with a larger acceleration for backward perturbations. We conclude that postural responses to backward and forward perturbations may be processed by different neural circuits, with influence of startle pathways on postural responses to backward perturbations. These findings give directions for future studies investigating whether deficits in startle pathways may explain the prominent backward instability seen in patients with Parkinson's disease and progressive supranuclear palsy.