A single center analysis of long-term outcomes and survival related risk factors in liver retransplantation.

Background: Liver retransplant is the only option to save a patient with liver graft failure. However, it is controversial due to its poor survival outcome compared to primary transplantation. Insufficient deceased organ donation in Taiwan leads to high waitlist mortality. Hence, living-donor grafts offer a valuable alternative for retransplantation. This study aims to analyze the single center's outcome in living donor liver retransplantation (re-LDLT) and deceased donor liver retransplantation (re-DDLT) as well as the survival related confounding risk factors. Methods: This is a single center retrospective study including 32 adults who underwent liver retransplantation (re-LT) from June 2002 to April 2020. The cohort was divided into a re-LDLT and a re-DDLT group and survival outcomes were analyzed. Patient outcomes over different periods, the effect of timing on survival, and multivariate analysis for risk factors were also demonstrated. Results: Of the 32 retransplantations, the re-LDLT group (n=11) received grafts from younger donors (31.3 vs. 43.75 years, P=0.016), with lower graft weights (688 vs. 1,457.2 g, P<0.001) and shorter cold ischemia time (CIT) (45 vs. 313 min, P<0.001). The 5-year survival was significantly better in the re-LDLT group than in the re-DDLT group (100% vs. 70.8%, P=0.02). This difference was adjusted when only retransplantation after 2010 was analyzed. Further analysis showed that the timing of retransplantation (early vs. late) did not affect patient survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that prolonged warm ischemia time (WIT) and intraoperative blood transfusion were related to poor long-term survival. Conclusions: Retransplantation with living donor graft demonstrated good long-term outcomes with acceptable complications to both recipient and donor. It may serve as a choice in areas lacking deceased donors. The timing of retransplantation did not affect the long-term survival. Further effort should be made to reduce WIT and massive blood transfusion as they contributed to poor survival after retransplantation.

The outcomes and biliary complications of a staged biliary reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation: a propensity score matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled massive bleeding and bowel edema are critical issues during liver transplantation. Temporal intra-abdominal packing with staged biliary reconstruction (SBR) yields acceptable outcomes in deceased donor liver transplantation; however, data on living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) are scarce. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 1269 patients who underwent LDLT was performed. After one-to-two propensity score matching, patients who underwent LDLT with SBR were compared with those who underwent LDLT with one-stage biliary reconstruction (OSBR). The primary outcomes were graft survival (GS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were postoperative biliary complications. RESULTS: There were 55 and 110 patients in the SBR and OSBR groups, respectively. The median blood loss was 6500 mL in the SBR and 4875 mL in the OSBR group. Patients receiving SBR-LDLT had higher incidence of sepsis (69.0% vs. 43.6%; P < 0.01) and intra-abdominal infections (60.0% vs. 30.9%; P < 0.01). Biliary complication rates (14.5% vs. 19.1%; P = 0.47) and 1-and 5-year GS (87.27%, 74.60% vs. 83.64%, 72.71%; P = 0.98) and OS (89.09%, 78.44% vs. 84.55%, 73.70%; P = 0.752) rates were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: SBR could serve as a life-saving procedure for patients undergoing complex critical LDLT, with GS, OS, and biliary outcomes comparable to those of OSBR.

Case report of Modified Viabahn Open Revascularization TEChnique (VORTEC) as a rescue strategy for hepatic artery dissection after initial endovascular treatment of postpancreaticoduodenectomy hemorrhage.

RATIONALE: Currently endovascular treatments are commonly utilized to treat postpancreaticoduodenectomy hemorrhage. However, when endovascular procedure went wrong, open surgery with ligation of the culprit vessels would be the most common salvage method. With Modified Viabahn Open Revascularization TEChnique (VORTEC), we can try to rescue the vessel without sacrificing it by introduction of another endovascular stent under direct method. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 76-year-old man with stage IIIA ampulla vater adenocarcinoma underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and experience pancreatic leak complicated with postpancreaticoduodenectomy hemorrhage. DIAGNOSIS: Emergent angiography revealed extravasation from proper hepatic artery. INTERVENTIONS: A 6 mm Viabahn stent was deployed but no distal runoff. Operation was shifted to emergent laparotomy and revealed intimal dissection of hepatic artery. Modified VORTEC was performed with guidewire redirected to true lumen and another stent was deployed under direct vision. OUTCOMES: Patient's hepatic artery was preserved and with no consequent liver failure. LESSON: Modified VORTEC method could be used as salvage strategy for artery dissection after initial endovascular treatment failed.

Importance of daptomycin dosage on the clinical outcome in liver transplant recipients with vancomycin-resistant enterococci infection.

We retrospectively studied 16 (3 colonization and 13 infections) early post-liver transplant (≤60-day after transplantation) patients with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) colonization/infection from 2016 to 2019. All VRE isolates were Enterococcus faecium. Of 13 patients with VRE infection, 12 (92.3%) underwent living-donor liver transplantation and 1 underwent deceased donor liver transplantation. Among these 13 patients, the median time from transplant to emergence of VRE infection was 12 days. The median interval from VRE infection to death was 27 days. Of these 13 patients, eleven patients (8 survived; 3 died) received daptomycin therapy for VRE. Among them, 4 (36.3%) received daptomycin doses <8 mg/kg. Non-survivors (n = 3) received significantly lower daptomycin dose than survivors (n = 8; p = .040). Daptomycin doses <8mg/kg were more frequently associated with non-survivors (n = 3) than with survivors (n = 8; p = .024). In summary, the suboptimal dosage of daptomycin may have contributed to a higher rate of in-hospital mortality. Doses ≥8 mg/kg may be needed to adequately treat VRE infection in liver transplant recipients.