A Hybrid Model of Pediatric and Adult Critical Care During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Surge: The Experience of Two Tertiary Hospitals in London and New York.

OBJECTIVES: The current novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 outbreak has caused an unprecedented demand on global adult critical care services. As adult patients have been disproportionately affected by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, pediatric practitioners world-wide have stepped forward to support their adult colleagues. In general, standalone pediatric hospitals expanded their capacity to centralize pediatric critical care, decanting patients from other institutions. There are few units that ran a hybrid model, managing both adult and pediatric patients with the same PICU staff. In this report, we describe the hybrid model implemented at our respective institutions with shared experiences, pitfalls, challenges, and adjustments required in caring for both young and older patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Two PICUs in urban tertiary hospitals in London and New York. PATIENTS: Adult and pediatric patients admitted to the PICU in roughly a 6-week period during the coronavirus disease 2019 surge. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The PICU at King's College Hospital admitted 23 non-coronavirus disease adult patients, while whereas the PICU at Morgan Stanley's Children Hospital in New York admitted 46 adults, 30 of whom were coronavirus disease positive. The median age of adult patients at King's College Hospital was higher than those admitted in New York, 53 years (19-77 yr) and 24.4 years (18-52 yr), respectively. Catering to the different physical, emotional, and social needs of both children and adults by the same PICU team was challenging. One important consideration in both locations was the continued care of patients with severe non-coronavirus disease-related illnesses such as neurosurgical emergencies, trauma, and septic shock. Furthermore, retention of critical specialists such as transplant services allowed for nine and four solid organ transplants to occur in London and New York, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This hybrid model successfully allowed for the expansion into adult critical care while maintaining essential services for critically ill children. Simultaneous care of adults and children in the ICU can be sustained if healthcare professionals work collaboratively, show proactive insight into anticipated issues, and exhibit clear leadership.

A TeamSTEPPS® implementation plan for recently assigned interns and nurses.

Interns and newly assigned nurses are expected to assimilate rapidly and begin functioning as members of interprofessional teams. This mixed-method pilot research assessed the impact of a Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS®) implementation plan in an urban academic teaching hospital that included a cohort of newly assigned pediatric interns and nurses (N = 23). We collected pre- and post-intervention course knowledge and team performance data from two teams in two separate simulation cases. We also surveyed the learners using an open-ended survey to ask about the value of their interprofessional learning experience. TeamSTEPPS® course knowledge improved from pre- to post-intervention (p < 0.001). Team performance scores were tallied and descriptively compared between pre- and post-intervention. Teams performed higher in both post-intervention simulation cases than in the pre-assessments. Post-intervention groups were assessed scores of 4 and 5 in more areas of the team performance checklist. Knowledge scores were compared between pre- and post- intervention by a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Median scores improved from 17 to 20 following the intervention. Six themes emerged from the coding process that expressed a learned appreciation for contributing to a culture where the expectation is that team members speak up to support patient safety and other team members. As shown by this pilot research, TeamSTEPPS® training approaches that follow the 4-phase brain-based lesson plan for simulation and include interprofessional membership can be promising for integrating newly assigned members into existing clinical teams.

A Saturated Approach to the Four-Phase, Brain-Based Simulation Framework for TeamSTEPPS® in a Pediatric Medicine Unit.

INTRODUCTION: Although many organizations have reported successful outcomes as a result of Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS), implementation can be challenging, with its share of administrative obstacles and lack of research that shows observable change in practice. METHODS: This quantitative, pretest/posttest design pilot research used a combination of classroom simulation-based instruction and in situ simulation in a Pediatrics department in an urban academic center. All personnel with direct patient care responsibilities (n = 547) were trained in TeamSTEPPS in an 8-week period. TeamSTEPPS course knowledge scores were compared pretraining to posttraining using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The performance of two-day and overnight shift teams, pre- and postintervention was assessed using the TeamSTEPPS Team Performance Observation Tool. RESULTS: TeamSTEPPS course knowledge improved from the beginning of the course to completion with median scores of 16 and 19, respectively (P < 0.001). Both day and evening postintervention groups demonstrated greater team performance scores than their control counterparts. Specifically, postintervention day shift team showed the greatest improvement and demonstrated more TeamSTEPPS behaviors. CONCLUSION: This pilot study involving 1 department in an urban hospital showed that TeamSTEPPS knowledge and performance could be improved to increase patient safety and reduce medical errors. However, teams need to be trained within a shorter period so they can apply a shared-model of teamwork and communication. Leaders and educators throughout the department must also reinforce the behaviors and include them in every education intervention.

Provider Beliefs Regarding Early Mobilization in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

PURPOSE: Critically ill patients are at risk for short and long term morbidity. Early mobilization (EM) of critically ill adults is safe and feasible, with improvement in outcomes. There are limited studies evaluating EM in pediatric critical care patients. Provider beliefs and concerns must be evaluated prior to EM implementation in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). DESIGN AND METHODS: A survey was distributed to PICU providers assessing beliefs and concerns with regards to EM of PICU patients. RESULTS: Seventy-one providers responded. Most staff believed EM would be beneficial. The largest perceived benefits were decreased length of both stay and mechanical ventilation. The largest perceived concerns were risk of both endotracheal tube and central venous catheter dislodgement. Surveyed clinicians felt significantly more comfortable mobilizing the oldest as compared to the youngest patients (p<0.0001). Clinicians also felt significantly more comfortable mobilizing patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in the oldest as compared to the youngest patients (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: There is clear benefit to the EM of adult ICU patients, with evidence supporting its safety and feasibility. As pediatric patients pose different challenges, it is imperative to understand provider concerns prior to the implementation of EM. Our research demonstrates similar concerns between adult and pediatric programs, with the addition of significant concern surrounding EM in very young children. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Understanding pediatric specific concerns with regards to EM will allow for the proper development and implementation of pediatric EM programs, allowing us to assess safety, feasibility, and ultimately outcomes.