Comparison of perioperative outcomes and complications between intracorporeal, extracorporeal, and hybrid ileal conduit urinary diversion during robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a comparative propensity score-matched analysis from nationwide multi-institutional study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the impact of different urinary diversion (UD) techniques on the peri- and postoperative complications of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with ileal conduit. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 373 patients undergoing RARC with ileal conduit at 11 institutions in Japan between April 2018 and December 2021. Propensity score weighting was performed to adjust for confounding factors such as age, sex, body mass index, performance status, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, previous abdominal surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and preoperative high T stage (≥ cT3) and high N stage (≥ cN1). Perioperative complications were then compared among three groups: extracorporeal, intracorporeal, and hybrid urinary diversion (ECUD, ICUD, and HUD, respectively). RESULTS: A total of 150, 68, and 155 patients received ECUD, HUD, and ICUD, respectively. Bowel reconstruction time and UD time were significantly shorter in the ECUD group (p < 0.001), and console time was significantly longer and blood loss was significantly higher in the ICUD group (p < 0.001). For postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification grade ≥ 3), surgical site infection (p = 0.004), pelvic abscess (p = 0.013), anastomotic urine leak (p = 0.007), and pelvic organ prolapse (p = 0.011) significantly occurred in the ECUD group. For all grades, ileus was more common in the HUD group, whereas anastomotic stricture was more common in the ECUD group compared with the other groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Severe complications did not increase after HUD and ICUD compared with ECUD; however, console time tended to be longer and blood loss was slightly higher during RARC.

BRCA2 Frameshift Mutation in de novo Small-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Prostate: A Case Report.

A 66-year-old male was diagnosed with cT4N0M1b small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the prostate. Four months after the administration of combined androgen blockade, multiple novel metastatic regions in the lung and liver and progression of bone metastasis were observed. The patient was referred to our hospital because of biochemical and radiographic progression after four cycles of docetaxel as a first-line therapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. Transurethral resection of the prostate and hepatic biopsy revealed small-cell carcinoma with positive expression of neuroendocrine markers. The FoundationOne CDx next-generation sequencing test revealed several pathogenic variants, including BRCA2 (W1692fs*3), KEAP1 (R320W), and TP53 (C2385) mutation. After four cycles of chemotherapy with carboplatin plus etoposide (CE), the metastatic regions regressed markedly. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) level decreased by 96.9% and 91.6%, respectively. However, 2 months after the completion of four cycles of CE, elevation of tumor marker levels, and re-growth of the metastatic regions were observed. Although olaparib, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi), achieved a 45.2% decrease in NSE, the patient rejected to continue therapy because of G2 adverse events. After receiving an additional two cycles of CE and one cycle of cabazitaxel, the patient died because of cancer progression 24 months after the initial treatment for prostate cancer. Here, we present a case of BRCA2-altered small-cell neuroendocrine prostate cancer treated with both platinum-containing chemotherapy and PARPi. Both therapies achieved an initial response; however, durable responses were not obtained. Additional discussion regarding the optimal treatment strategy for BRCA-altered small-cell/neuroendocrine prostate cancer is required.

The Current Trend of Radiation Therapy for Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer.

A recent approach to radiotherapy for prostate cancer is the administration of high doses of radiation to the prostate while minimizing the risk of side effects. Thus, image-guided radiotherapy utilizes advanced imaging techniques and is a feasible strategy for increasing the radiation dose. New radioactive particles are another approach to achieving high doses and safe procedures. Prostate brachytherapy is currently considered as a combination therapy. Spacers are useful to protect adjacent organs, specifically the rectum, from excessive radiation exposure.

Real clinical outcomes of nivolumab plus ipilimumab for renal cell carcinoma in patients over 75 years old.

BACKGROUND: Although nivolumab plus ipilimumab is the standard treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), its efficacy and safety in older patients remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of nivolumab plus ipilimumab for metastatic RCC in patients aged ≥ 75 years. METHODS: We enrolled 120 patients with metastatic RCC treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab from August 2015 to January 2023. Objective response rates (ORRs) were compared between patients aged < 75 and ≥ 75 years. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events were compared between the groups. Adverse events were evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. RESULTS: Among the patients, 57 and 63 were classified as intermediate and poor risk, respectively, and one could not be classified. The median follow-up duration after the initiation of treatment was 16 months. The patient characteristics between the groups, except for age, were not significantly different. Intergroup differences in ORR (42% vs. 40%; p = 0.818), PFS (HR: 0.820, 95% CI 0.455-1.479; p = 0.510), and median OS (HR: 1.492, 95% CI 0.737-3.020; p = 0.267) were not significant. The incidence of adverse events (50% vs. 67%; p = 0.111) and nivolumab plus ipilimumab discontinuation due to adverse events was not significantly different between the groups (14% vs. 13%; p = 0.877). CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab was comparable between patients with metastatic RCC aged < 75 and those ≥ 75 years with respect to their ORRs, PFS, OS, and adverse event rates.

Primary resistance to nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) is the first-line treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Approximately 40% of patients achieve a durable response; however, 20% develop primary resistant disease (PRD) to NIVO+IPI, about which little is known in patients with mRCC. Therefore, this investigation aimed to evaluate the clinical implication of PRD in patients with mRCC to select better candidates in whom NIVO+IPI can be initiated as first-line therapy. METHODS: This multi-institutional retrospective cohort study used data collected between August 2015 and January 2023. In total, 120 patients with mRCC treated with NIVO+IPI were eligible. Associations between immune-related adverse events and progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), and objective response rate were analyzed. The relationship between other clinical factors and outcomes was also evaluated. RESULTS: The median observation period was 16 months (interquartile range, 5-27). The median age at NIVO+IPI initiation was 68 years in the male-dominant population (n = 86, 71.7%), and most patients had clear cell histology (n = 104, 86.7%). PRD was recorded in 26 (23.4%) of 111 investigated patients during NIVO+IPI therapy. Patients who experienced PRD showed worse OS (hazard ratio: 4.525, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.315-8.850, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that lymph node metastasis (LNM) (odds ratio: 4.274, 95% CI: 1.075-16.949, p = 0.039) was an independent risk factor for PRD. CONCLUSIONS: PRD was strongly correlated with worse survival rates. LNM was independently associated with PRD in patients with mRCC receiving NIVO+IPI as first-line therapy and might indicate that a candidate will not benefit from NIVO+IPI.

Clinical impact of early response to first-line VEGFR-TKI in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma on survival: A multi-institutional retrospective study.

It remains unknown whether the early response to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR-TKI) management in malignancies links to long-term survival. The objective of this study was to investigate the survival rates and predictive factors of early response in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) managed by VEGFR-TKIs. From Jan. 2008 to Oct. 2018, 496 patients were treated with VEGFR-TKIs as first-line treatment at the eight Japanese hospitals (Michinoku RCC). Early cessation was defined as VEGFR-TKIs being given up within 3 months after their initiation. The number of patients in early cessation VEGFR-TKIs (Cohort I) was 173 (34.9%), and in long-term use (Cohort II) was 323 (65.1%). The cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were better in Cohort II. IMDC Poor-risk was at risk of early cessation of a first-line VEGFR-TKI. Axitinib was the most preferred drug for long-term treatment. On closer examination, both Cohort I and II were divided into two groups, the patients ceased VEGFR-TKI due to adverse events (Group A [67 from Cohort I] and Group C [51 from Cohort II]) and disease progression (Group B [106 from Cohort I] and Group D [272 from Cohort II]). Despite that the cessation was adverse events, CSS and OS in Group A were worse than both Group C and D. Axitinib was administered with the safer profile. IMDC Poor risk was the risk factor for the early disease progression. Managing early adverse events may contribute to a better prognosis in mRCC patients treated VEGFR-TKIs.