Evaluation of adverse drug reactions in medical intensive care units.

PURPOSE: Patterns of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the medical intensive care unit (MICU) were analysed, and signals for detecting ADRs were developed from the analysis. METHOD: A retrospective study was conducted in MICU wards at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Seoul, Korea. The areas included one general MICU and one cancer centre MICU. Two pharmacists evaluated ADRs in terms of length of stay, causality, severity, preventability, types, related organs, and incidence. Differences in ADR perception rates between physicians and pharmacists were also evaluated. ADR cases detected through the evaluation were reviewed to develop specific alerting signals for ICU ADRs. RESULTS: The study group included 346 patients admitted to the ICU over 4 months. The overall incidence of ADRs was 32%. ICU length of stay is closely related to ADRs (p = 0.014). Most ADR cases were mild, temporary, and harmful to the patient. Twenty percent of ADRs were preventable, and 74% were type A. Of the ADRs, 70% were noted by physicians; 80% required intervention. The most commonly implicated drug was amphotericin B, and the clinical presentation was a haematologic reaction. Data on the time required for pharmacists to identify ADRs indicated that they were not slower than physicians. Six signals for early detection of the ADRs were developed. CONCLUSIONS: The overall ADR incidence in the MICU was about one-third, and the length of stay of the ADR group was longer than that of those without this experience. Automated signal generation was developed. It seemed to be a valuable tool for faster and more efficient patient management, and possibly prevention of ADRs. A future study should scientifically evaluate the clinical relevance of this tool.

Use of multiattribute utility theory for formulary management in a health system.

PURPOSE: The application, utility, and flexibility of the multiattribute utility theory (MAUT) when used as a formulary decision methodology in a Korean medical center were evaluated. METHODS: A drug analysis model using MAUT consisting of 10 steps was designed for two drug classes of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). These two drug classes contain the most diverse agents among cardiovascular drugs on Samsung Medical Center's drug formulary. The attributes identified for inclusion in the drug analysis model were effectiveness, safety, patient convenience, and cost, with relative weights of 50%, 30%, 10%, and 10%, respectively. The factors were incorporated into the model to quantify the contribution of each attribute. For each factor, a utility scale of 0-100 was established, and the total utility score for each alternative was calculated. An attempt was made to make the model adaptable to changing health care and regulatory circumstances. RESULTS: The analysis revealed amlodipine besylate to be an alternative agent, with the highest total utility score among the dihydropyridine CCBs, while barnidipine hydrochloride had the lowest score. For ARBs, losartan potassium had the greatest total utility score, while olmesartan medoxomil had the lowest. CONCLUSION: A drug analysis model based on the MAUT was successfully developed and used in making formulary decisions for dihydropyridine CCBs and ARBs for a Korean health system. The model incorporates sufficient utility and flexibility of a drug's attributes and can be used as an alternative decision-making tool for formulary management in health systems.

Determination of plasma warfarin concentrations in Korean patients and its potential for clinical application.

BACKGROUND: Warfarin is a widely used oral anticoagulant with broad within- and between-individual dose requirements. Warfarin concentrations can be monitored by assessing its pharmacologic effects on International Normalized Ratio (INR). However, this approach has not been applied in the routine clinical management of patients receiving warfarin therapy. We performed a plasma warfarin assay using high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) to determine if such an assay can be utilized in routine clinical practice. METHODS: We included a total of 105 patients with atrial fibrillation, and who were receiving warfarin for more than 1 yr. The plasma concentrations of total warfarin and 7-hydroxywarfarin were determined by HPLC-MS/MS (Waters, UK). We assessed the association between warfarin dose, concentration, and INR as well as the effects of these factors on warfarin concentrations. RESULTS: The mean maintenance dose of warfarin in 105 patients was 4.1 +/-1.3 mg/day (range, 1.7-8.0 mg/day) and their mean plasma warfarin concentration was 1.3+/-0.5 mg/L. We defined a concentration range of 0.6-2.6 mg/L (corresponding to the 2.5th to 97.5th percentile range of the Plasma warfarin levels in the 74 patients showing INR within target range) as the therapeutic range for warfarin. The correlation of warfarin dose with warfarin concentration (r(2)=0.259, P<0.001) was higher than that with INR (r(2)=0.029, P=0.072). CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant correlation between warfarin dose and plasma warfarin concentrations in Korean patients with atrial fibrillation. Hence, plasma warfarin monitoring can help determine dose adjustments and improve our understanding of individual patient response to warfarin treatment.

Factors affecting the interindividual variability of warfarin dose requirement in adult Korean patients.

INTRODUCTION: Warfarin, a commonly prescribed anticoagulant, exhibits large interindividual and interethnic differences in the dose required for its anticoagulation effect. Asian patients require a much lower maintenance dose compared with Caucasians; the explanation for these differences remains unknown. METHODS: We analyzed five single nucleotide polymorphisms of the vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1 gene (VKORC1) and the *3 variant of cytochrome P450 (CYP)2C9, as well as the plasma warfarin concentration, in 108 Korean patients with atrial fibrillation. RESULTS: Genotypic frequencies of VKORC1 +1173CT and CYP2C9*1/*3 were 17.6 and 10.2%, respectively, in the study population; VKORC1 +1173CC and CYP2C9*3/*4 were detected in one patient each. Patients carrying at least one copy of the VKORC1 +1173C allele, or the H7 (group B) haplotype, required a significantly higher warfarin dose (n = 20; 5.5 +/- 1.7 mg/day) than those homozygous for the +1173T allele, or the H1 (group A) haplotype, (3.8 +/- 1.2 mg/day; p < 0.001). There were statistically significant differences in warfarin dose between the CYP2C9*1/*1 (4.3 +/- 1.6 mg/day; p < 0.001) and those with the other two genotypes including CYP2C9*1/*3 and CYP2C9*3/*4 (2.7 +/- 0.9 mg/day). The multiple regression analysis revealed that the VKORC1 genotype (r2 = 0.197; p < 0.001), the age when warfarin started (r2 = 0.09; p < 0.001), body surface area (r2 = 0.041; p = 0.004) and CYP2C9 genotype (r2 = 0.029; p = 0.014) were factors associated with the daily dose of warfarin required. CONCLUSION: In the present study, we found that the VKORC1 polymorphism had a dominant genetic influence on interindividual variability for warfarin dose in Korean patients. It explained approximately 32% of the overall variability in warfarin dose requirements given all of the variables studied. Thus, analysis of the VKORC1 genotypes may be important to guide warfarin dose selection and allow personalized warfarin treatment.