Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 56(3): 328-35, 2013 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23392147

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A number of small prospective studies with conflicting results have evaluated the effect of sugar-free chewing gum on postoperative GI recovery in patients initially maintained nil per os after major colorectal surgery. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the effect of sugared chewing gum in combination with early enteral feeding on recovery of GI function after major colorectal surgery to ascertain any additive effects of this combination. DESIGN: This was a randomized prospective study. SETTING: This study was conducted at a single-institution tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing major colorectal surgery were included. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to sugared chewing gum (Gum) (instructed to chew 3 times daily; 45 minutes each time for 7 days postoperatively) or No Gum after major colorectal surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measured was time to tolerating low residue diet without emesis for 24 hours. The secondary outcomes measured were time to flatus, time to bowel movement, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative pain, nausea, and appetite. RESULTS: One hundred fourteen patients (60 No Gum; 54 Gum) were included in our analysis after randomization. There was no significant difference in time to tolerating a low-residue diet, time to flatus, time to bowel movement, length of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, postoperative pain, nausea, or appetite between patients assigned to Gum or No Gum. There was an increased incidence of bloating, indigestion, and eructation in the Gum group (13%) in comparison with the No Gum group (2%) (p = 0.03). LIMITATIONS: Study subjects and investigators were not blinded. Multiple types of operations may cause intergroup variability. CONCLUSIONS: There does not appear to be any benefit to sugared chewing gum in comparison with no gum in patients undergoing major colorectal surgery managed with early feeding in the postoperative period. There may be increased incidence of bloating, indigestion, and eructation, possibly related to swallowed air during gum chewing.


Asunto(s)
Goma de Mascar , Cirugía Colorrectal/efectos adversos , Nutrición Enteral/métodos , Motilidad Gastrointestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Defecación , Nutrición Enteral/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
2.
Eur J Med Genet ; 55(10): 548-51, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22781752

RESUMEN

Gastrointestinal complications are common in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, affecting up to 50% of individuals depending on the subtype. The spectrum of gastrointestinal manifestations is broad and ranges from life threatening spontaneous perforation of the visceral organs to a more benign functional symptoms. Here we describe the clinical and radiographic manifestations of visceroptosis of the bowel, a rare complication of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome that is characterized by prolapse of abdominal organs below their natural position. We further review the literature on gastrointestinal complications in the different forms of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Ehlers-Danlos/complicaciones , Prolapso Visceral/diagnóstico , Prolapso Visceral/etiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Tracto Gastrointestinal Inferior/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía , Tracto Gastrointestinal Superior/diagnóstico por imagen , Prolapso Visceral/diagnóstico por imagen
3.
Am Surg ; 71(12): 1055-7, 2005 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16447479

RESUMEN

We report a case of a translocated intrauterine device (IUD) embedded within the colon wall. Endoscopic tattooing and laparoscopy was used to identify the colonic site and facilitate extraction by colonic resection. A review of the literature and discussion of laparoscopic management of this complication is presented.


Asunto(s)
Colon Sigmoide/cirugía , Remoción de Dispositivos/métodos , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/diagnóstico , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/cirugía , Dispositivos Intrauterinos/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Colectomía/métodos , Neoplasias del Colon/prevención & control , Colonoscopía/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...