The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Ambulatory Lumbar Spine Decompression Surgery.

Background Only a few studies have examined the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on spine ambulatory surgeries and changes in trends. Therefore, we investigated trends during the pre-pandemic period and three pandemic stages in patients undergoing lumbar decompression procedures in the ambulatory surgery (AMS) setting. Methodology A total of 2,670 adult patients undergoing one- or two-level lumbar decompression surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized into the following four groups: 1: pre-pandemic (before the pandemic from January 1, 2019, to March 16, 2020); 2: restricted period (when elective surgery was canceled from March 17, 2020, to June 30, 2020); 3: post-restricted 2020 (July 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020, before vaccination); and 4: post-restricted 2021 (January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 after vaccination). Simple and multivariable logistic regression analyses as well as retrospective interrupted time series (ITS) analysis were conducted comparing AMS patients in the four periods. Results Patients from the restricted pandemic period were younger and healthier, which led to a shorter length of stay (LOS). The ITS analysis demonstrated a significant drop in mean LOS at the beginning of the restricted period and recovered to the pre-pandemic levels in one year. Multivariable logistic regression analyses indicated that the pandemic was an independent factor influencing the LOS in post-restricted phases. Conclusions As the post-restricted 2020 period itself might be independently influenced by the pandemic, these results should be taken into account when interpreting the LOS of the patients undergoing ambulatory spine surgery in post-restricted phases.

Discrepancies in recommendations for return to regular activities after cervical spine surgery: A survey study.

Background: The recommended timing for returning to common activities after cervical spine surgery varies widely among physicians based on training background and personal opinion, without clear guidelines or consensus. The purpose of this study was to analyze spine surgeons' responses about the recommended timing for returning to common activities after different cervical spine procedures. Methods: This was a survey study including 91 spine surgeons. The participants were asked to complete an anonymous online survey. Questions regarding their recommended time for returning to regular activities (showering, driving, biking, running, swimming, sedentary work, and nonsedentary work) after anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF), cervical disc replacement (CDR), posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF), and laminoplasty were included. Comparisons of recommended times for return to activities after each surgical procedure were made based on surgeons' years in practice. Results: For ACDF and PCDF, there were no statistically significant differences in recommended times for return to any activity when stratified by years in practice. When considering CDR, return to non-sedentary work differed between surgeons in practice for 10 to 15 years, who recommended return at 3 months, and all other groups of surgeons, who recommended 6 weeks. Laminoplasty surgery yielded the most variability in activity recommendations, with earlier recommended return (6 weeks) to biking, non-sedentary work, and sedentary work in the most experienced surgeon group (>15 years in practice) than in all other surgeon experience groups (3 months). Conclusions: We observed significant variability in surgeon recommendations for return to regular activities after cervical spine surgery.

Association between lumbar intervertebral vacuum phenomenon severity and posterior paraspinal muscle atrophy in patients undergoing spine surgery.

PURPOSE: Intervertebral vacuum phenomenon (IVP) and paraspinal muscular atrophy are age-related changes in the lumbar spine. The relationship between both parameters has not been investigated. We aimed to analyze the correlation between IVP and paraspinal muscular atrophy in addition to describing the lumbar vacuum severity (LVS) scale, a new parameter to estimate lumbar degeneration. METHODS: We analyzed patients undergoing spine surgery between 2014 and 2016. IVP severity was assessed utilizing CT scans. The combination of vacuum severity on each lumbar level was used to define the LVS scale, which was classified into mild, moderate and severe. MRIs were used to evaluate paraspinal muscular fatty infiltration of the multifidus and erector spinae. The association of fatty infiltration with the severity of IVP at each lumbar level was assessed with a univariable and multivariable ordinal regression model. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-seven patients were included in our study (128 females and 139 males) with a mean age of 62.6 years (55.1-71.2). Multivariate analysis adjusted for age, BMI and sex showed positive correlations between LVS-scale severity and fatty infiltration in the multifidus and erector spinae, whereas no correlation was observed in the psoas muscle. CONCLUSION: IVP severity is positively correlated with paraspinal muscular fatty infiltration. This correlation was stronger for the multifidus than the erector spinae. No correlations were observed in the psoas muscle. The lumbar vacuum severity scale was significantly correlated with advanced disc degeneration with vacuum phenomenon.

Severe Intervertebral Vacuum Phenomenon is Associated With Higher Preoperative Low Back Pain, ODI, and Indication for Fusion in Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of prospective collected data. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the association between intervertebral vacuum phenomenon (IVP) and clinical parameters in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: IVP is a sign of advanced disc degeneration. The correlation between IVP severity and low back pain in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis has not been previously analyzed. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent surgery. Vacuum phenomenon was measured on computed tomography scan and classified into mild, moderate, and severe. A lumbar vacuum severity (LVS) scale was developed based on vacuum severity. The associations between IVP at L4/5 and the LVS scale, preoperative and postoperative low back pain, as well as the Oswestry Disability Index was assessed. The association of IVP at L4/5 and the LVS scale and surgical decision-making, defined as decompression alone or decompression and fusion, was assessed through univariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 167 patients (52.7% female) were included in the study. The median age was 69 years (interquartile range 62-72). Overall, 100 (59.9%) patients underwent decompression and fusion and 67 (40.1%) underwent decompression alone. The univariable regression demonstrated a significantly increased odds ratio (OR) for back pain in patients with more severe IVP at L4/5 [OR=1.69 (95% CI 1.12-2.60), P =0.01]. The univariable regressions demonstrated a significantly increased OR for increased disability with more severe L4/L5 IVP [OR=1.90 (95% CI 1.04-3.76), P =0.04] and with an increased LVS scale [OR=1.17 (95% CI 1.02-1.35), P =0.02]. IVP severity of the L4/L5 were associated with higher indication for fusion surgery. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis undergoing surgery, the severity of vacuum phenomenon at L4/L5 was associated with greater preoperative back pain and worse Oswestry Disability Index. Patients with severe IVP were more likely to undergo fusion.

Predicting conversion of ambulatory ACDF patients to inpatient: a machine learning approach.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Machine learning is a powerful tool that has become increasingly important in the orthopedic field. Recently, several studies have reported that predictive models could provide new insights into patient risk factors and outcomes. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common operation that is performed as an outpatient procedure. However, some patients are required to convert to inpatient status and prolonged hospitalization due to their condition. Appropriate patient selection and identification of risk factors for conversion could provide benefits to patients and the use of medical resources. PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a machine-learning algorithm to identify risk factors associated with unplanned conversion from outpatient to inpatient status for ACDF patients. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This is a machine-learning-based analysis using retrospectively collected data. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent one- or two-level ACDF in an ambulatory setting at a single specialized orthopedic hospital between February 2016 to December 2021. OUTCOME MEASURES: Length of stay, conversion rates from ambulatory setting to inpatient. METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups based on length of stay: (1) Ambulatory (discharge within 24 hours) or Extended Stay (greater than 24 hours but fewer than 48 hours), and (2) Inpatient (greater than 48 hours). Factors included in the model were based on literature review and clinical expertise. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and intraoperative factors, such as surgery duration and time, were included. We compared the performance of different machine learning algorithms: Logistic Regression, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). We split the patient data into a training and validation dataset using a 70/30 split. The different models were trained in the training dataset using cross-validation. The performance was then tested in the unseen validation set. This step is important to detect overfitting. The performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics analysis (ROC) as the primary outcome. An AUC of 0.7 was considered fair, 0.8 good, and 0.9 excellent, according to established cut-offs. RESULTS: A total of 581 patients (59% female) were available for analysis. Of those, 140 (24.1%) were converted to inpatient status. The median age was 51 (IQR 44-59), and the median BMI was 28 kg/m2 (IQR 24-32). The XGBoost model showed the best performance with an AUC of 0.79. The most important features were the length of the operation, followed by sex (based on biological attributes), age, and operation start time. The logistic regression model and the SVM showed worse results, with an AUC of 0.71 each. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a novel approach to predicting conversion to inpatient status in eligible patients for ambulatory surgery. The XGBoost model showed good predictive capabilities, superior to the older machine learning approaches. This model also revealed the importance of surgical duration time, BMI, and age as risk factors for patient conversion. A developing field of study is using machine learning in clinical decision-making. Our findings contribute to this field by demonstrating the feasibility and accuracy of such methods in predicting outcomes and identifying risk factors, although external and multi-center validation studies are needed.

Lumbar lateral interbody fusion: step-by-step surgical technique and clinical experience.

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is a minimally invasive surgical approach used to treat a variety of degenerative and deformity conditions of the lumbar spine such as advanced degenerative disease, degenerative scoliosis, foraminal and central stenosis. It has emerged as an alternative to the traditional posterior and anterior lumbar approaches with some potential benefits such as lower blood loss and shorter hospital stay. In this article, we provide our single institutional surgical experience including main indications and contraindications, a step-by-step surgical technique description, a detailed preoperative imaging assessment with a focus on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) psoas anatomy, operative room (OR) setup and patient positioning. A descriptive surgical technical note of the following steps is provided: positioning and fluoroscopic confirmation, incision and intraoperative level confirmation, discectomy and endplate preparation, implant size selection and insertion and final fluoroscopic control, hemostasis check and wound closure along with an instructional surgical video with tips and pearls, postoperative patient care recommendations, common approach-related complications, along with our historical clinical institutional group experience. Finally, we summarize our research experience in this surgical approach with a focus on LLIF as a standalone procedure. Based on our experience, LLIF can be considered an effective surgical technique to treat degenerative lumbar spine conditions. Proper patient selection is mandatory to achieve good outcomes. Our institutional experience shows higher fusion rates with good clinical outcomes and a relatively low rate of complications.

Risk Factors for Unexpected Conversion From Ambulatory to Inpatient Admission Among One-level or Two-level ACDF Patients.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A retrospective observational study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the factors associated with the conversion of patient status from ambulatory anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) to inpatient. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgeries are increasingly performed in an ambulatory setting in an era of rising healthcare costs and pressure to improve patient satisfaction. ACDF is a common ambulatory cervical spine surgery, however, there are certain patients who are unexpectedly converted from an outpatient procedure to inpatient admission and little is known about the risk factors for conversion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent one-level or two-level ACDF in an ambulatory setting at a single specialized orthopedic hospital between February 2016 to December 2021 were included. Baseline demographics, surgical information, complications, and conversion reasons were compared between patients with ambulatory surgery or observational stay (stay <48 h) and inpatient (stay >48 h). RESULTS: In total, 662 patients underwent one-level or two-level ACDF (median age, 52 yr; 59.5% were male), 494 (74.6%) patients were discharged within 48 hours and 168 (25.4%) patients converted to inpatient. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that females, low body mass index <25, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (ASA) ≥3, long operation, high estimated blood loss, upper-level surgery, two-level fusion, late operation start time, and high postoperative pain score were considered independent risk factors for conversion to inpatient. Pain management was the most common reason for the conversion (80.0%). Ten patients (1.5%) needed reintubation or remained intubated for airway management. CONCLUSIONS: Several independent risk factors for prolonged hospital stay after ambulatory ACDF surgery were identified. Although some factors are unmodifiable, other factors, such as procedure duration, operation start time, and blood loss could be potential targets for intervention. Surgeons should be aware of the potential for life-threatening airway complications in ambulatory-scheduled ACDF.

Frailty Stratification Using the Modified 5-Item Frailty Index: Significant Variation within Frailty Patients in Spine Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Frailty status has been associated with higher rates of complications after spine surgery. However, frailty patients constitute a heterogeneous group based on the combinations of comorbidities. The objective of this study is to compare the combinations of variables that compose the modified 5-factor frailty index score (mFI-5) based on the number of comorbidities in terms of complications, reoperation, readmission, and mortality after spine surgery. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Database from 2009-2019 was used to identify patients who underwent elective spine surgery. The mFI-5 item score was calculated and patients were classified according to number and combination of comorbidities. Multivariable analysis was used to assess the independent impact of each combination of comorbidities in the mFI-5 score on the risk of complications. RESULTS: A total of 167, 630 patients were included with a mean age of 59.9 ± 13.6 years. The risk of complications was the lowest in patients with diabetes + hypertension (OR = 1.2) and highest in those with the combination of congestive heart failure (CHF), diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and dependent status (OR = 6.6); there was a high variation in complication rate based on specific combinations. CONCLUSIONS: There is high variability in terms of relative risk of complications based on the number and combination of different comorbidities, especially with CHF and dependent status. Therefore, frailty status encompasses a heterogeneous group and sub-stratification of frailty status is necessary to identify patients with significantly higher risk of complications.

The anatomical positioning change of retroperitoneal organs in prone and lateral position: an assessment for single-prone position lateral lumbar surgery.

PURPOSE: There are reports that performing lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in a prone, single position (single-prone LLIF) can be done safely in the prone position because the retroperitoneal organs reflect anteriorly with gravity. However, only a few study has investigated the safety of single-prone LLIF and retroperitoneal organ positioning in the prone position. We aimed to investigate the positioning of retroperitoneal organs in the prone position and evaluate the safety of single-prone LLIF surgery. METHODS: A total of 94 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The anatomical positioning of the retroperitoneal organs was evaluated by CT in the preoperative supine and intraoperative prone position. The distances from the centre line of the intervertebral body to the organs including aorta, inferior vena cava, ascending and descending colons, and bilateral kidneys were measured for the lumbar spine. An "at risk" zone was defined as distance less than 10 mm anterior from the centre line of the intervertebral body. RESULTS: Compared to supine preoperative CTs, bilateral kidneys at the L2/3 level as well as the bilateral colons at the L3/4 level had statistically significant ventral shift with prone positioning. The proportion of retroperitoneal organs within the at-risk zone ranged from 29.6 to 88.6% in the prone position. CONCLUSIONS: The retroperitoneal organs shifted ventrally with prone positioning. However, the amount of shift was not large enough to avoid risk for organ injuries and substantial proportion of patients had organs within the cage insertion corridor. Careful preoperative planning is warranted when considering single-prone LLIF.

The Utilization of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring for Lumbar Decompression and Fusion Surgery in New York State.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate trends in the utilization of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) during elective lumbar surgery procedures and to investigate the association between the use of IONM and surgical outcomes. BACKGROUND: The routine use of IONM in elective lumbar spine procedures has recently been called into question due to longer operative time, higher cost, and other substitute advanced technologies. METHODS: The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was accessed to perform this retrospective study. The trends of IONM use for lumbar decompression and fusion procedures were investigated from 2007 to 2018. The association between IONM use and surgical outcomes was investigated from 2017 to 2018. Multivariable logistic regression analyses, as well as propensity score matching (PS-matching), were conducted to assess IONM association in neurological deficits reduction. RESULTS: The utilization of IONM showed an increase in a linear fashion from 79 cases in 2007 to 6201 cases in 2018. A total of 34,592 (12,419 monitored and 22,173 unmonitored) patients were extracted, and 210 patients (0.6%) were reported for postoperative neurological deficits. Unadjusted comparisons demonstrated that the IONM group was associated with significantly fewer neurological complications. However, the multivariable analysis indicated that IONM was not a significant predictor of neurological injuries. After the PS-matching of 23,642 patients, the incidence of neurological deficits was not significantly different between IONM and non-IONM patients. CONCLUSION: The utilization of IONM for elective lumbar surgeries continues to gain popularity. Our results indicated that IONM use was not associated with a reduction in neurological deficits and will not support the routine use of IONM for all elective lumbar surgery.

Association of Frailty and Preoperative Hypoalbuminemia with the Risk of Complications, Readmission, and Mortality After Spine Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Frailty status and hypoalbuminemia have been associated with higher rates of complications after spine surgery. However, the combination of both conditions has not been fully analyzed. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of frailty and hypoalbuminemia on the risk of complications after spine surgery. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database from 2009 to 2019 was used. Frailty status was calculated using the modified 5-item frailty index (mFI-5). Patients were classified into nonfrail (mFI = 0), pre-frail (mFI = 1), and frail (mFI ≥2) groups and also based on albumin levels into normal (≥3.5 g/dL) and hypoalbuminemia groups (<3.5 g/dL). The latter group was also subclassified into mild and severe hypoalbuminemia groups. Multivariable analysis was used. A Spearman ρ correlation between albuminemia and mFI-5 was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 69,519 patients (36,705 men [52.8%] and 32,814 women [47.2%]) with a mean age of 61.0 ± 13.2 years were included. Patients were classified as nonfrail (n = 24,897), pre-frail (n = 28,897), and frail groups (n = 15,725). Hypoalbuminemia was significantly higher in the frail group (11.4%) compared with the nonfrail group (4.3%). An inverse correlation was observed between albumin levels and frailty status (ρ = -0.139; P < 0.0001). Frail patients with severe hypoalbuminemia had significantly higher risk of complications (odds ratio [OR], 5.0), reoperation (OR, 3.3), readmission (OR, 3.1), and mortality (OR, 31.8) compared with patients without hypoalbuminemia. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of frailty and hypoalbuminemia significantly increases the risk of complications after spine surgery. The prevalence of hypoalbuminemia in the frailty group was significantly higher than in nonfrail patients (11.4% vs. 4.3%). Both conditions should be evaluated preoperatively.

Is Diastasis Recti Abdominis Associated With Low Back Pain? A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is a common cause of disability worldwide; multiple causes and risk factors have been proposed in the genesis of back pain. Some studies reported an association between diastasis recti abdominis (DRA), a surrogate for decreased core strength muscle, and low back pain. We aimed to investigate the relationship between DRA and LBP through a systematic review. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature of clinical studies in English literature was conducted. PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were used to conduct the search up to January 2022. The strategy included the following keywords: "Lower Back Pain" AND "Diastasis Recti" OR "Rectus abdominis" OR "abdominal wall" OR "paraspinal musculature". RESULTS: From 207 records initially found, 34 were suitable for full review. Thirteen studies were finally included in this review, with a total of 2,820 patients. Five studies found a positive association between DRA and LBP (5 of 13 = 38.5%) whereas 8 studies did not find any association between DRA and LBP (8 of 13 = 61.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Of the studies included in this systematic review, 61.5% did not find an association between DRA and LBP whereas a positive correlation was observed in 38.5% of studies included. Based on the quality of the studies included in our review, better studies are warranted to understand the association between DRA and LBP.

Risk Factors for Ambulatory Surgery Conversion to Extended Stay Among Patients Undergoing One-level or Two-level Posterior Lumbar Decompression.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective observational study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the factors associated with the conversion of patient status from ambulatory surgery (AMS) to observation service (OS) (<48 h) or inpatient (>48 h). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: AMS is becoming increasingly common in the United States because it is associated with a similar quality of care compared with inpatient surgery, significant costs reduction, and patients' desire to recuperate at home. However, there are instances when AMS patients may be subjected to extended hospital stays. Unanticipated extension of hospitalization stays can be a great burden not only to patients but to medical providers and insurance companies alike. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 1096 patients who underwent one-level or two-level lumbar decompression AMS at an in-hospital, outpatient surgical facility between January 1, 2019, and March 16, 2020, were collected. Patients were categorized into three groups based on length of stay: (1) AMS, (2) OS, or (3) inpatient. Demographics, comorbidities, surgical information, and administrative information were collected. Simple and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted comparing AMS patients and OS/inpatient as well as OS and inpatients. RESULTS: Of the 1096 patients, 641 (58%) patients were converted to either OS (n=486) or inpatient (n=155). The multivariable analysis demonstrated that age (more than 80 yr old), high American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA) grade, history of sleep apnea, drain use, high estimated blood loss, long operation, late operation start time, and a high pain score were considered independent risk factors for AMS conversion to OS/inpatient. The risk factors for OS conversion to inpatient were an ASA class 3 or higher, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, steroid use, drain use, dural tear, and laminectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Several surgical factors along with patient-specific factors were significantly associated with AMS conversion. Addressing modifiable surgical factors might reduce the AMS conversion rate and be beneficial to patients and facilities.

Utilization Trends of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in New York State.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate trends in the utilization of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures in NY state using the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System and to determine if utilization of IONM resulted in a reduction in postoperative neurological deficits. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: IONM has been available to spinal surgeons for several decades. It has become increasingly prevalent in all facets of spinal surgery including elective ACDF procedures. The utility of IONM for preventing a neurological deficit in elective spine procedures has recently been called into question. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database were accessed to perform a retrospective cohort study comparing monitored versus unmonitored ACDF procedures between 2007 and 2018 as defined by the International Classification of Disease-9 and 10 Procedural Coding System (ICD-9 PCS, ICD-10 PCS) codes. Patient demographics, medical history, surgical intervention, pertinent in-hospital events, and urban versus rural medical centers (as defined by the United States Office of Management and Budget) were recorded. Propensity-score-matched comparisons were used to identify factors related to the utilization of IONM and risk factors for neurological deficits after elective ACDF. RESULTS: A total of 70,838 [15,092 monitored (21.3%) and 55,746 (78.7%) unmonitored] patients' data were extracted. The utilization of IONM since 2007 has increased in a linear manner from 0.9% of cases in 2007 to 36.7% by 2018. Overall, baseline characteristics of patients who were monitored during cases differed significantly from unmonitored patients in age, race/ethnicity, insurance type, presence of myelopathy or radiculopathy, and Charlson Comorbidity Index; however, only race/ethnicity was statistically significant when analyzed using propensity-score-matched. When comparing urban and rural medical centers, there is a significant lag in the adoption of the technology with no monitored cases in rural centers until 2012 with significant fluctuations in utilization compared with steadily increasing utilization among urban centers. From 2017 to 2018, reporting of neurological deficits after surgery resembled literature-established norms. Pooled analysis of these years revealed that the incidence of neurological complications occurred more frequently in monitored cases than in unmonitored (3.0% vs. 1.4%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The utility of IONM for elective ACDF remains uncertain; however, it continues to gain popularity for routine cases. For medical centers that lack similar resources to centers in more densely populated regions of NY state, reliable access to this technology is not a certainty. In our analysis of intraoperative neurological complications, it seems that IONM is not protective against neurological injury.

Do Thoracic Spinal Deformities Affect Outcomes of Spinal Cord Stimulators: A Retrospective Chart Review.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to ascertain whether the presence of structural thoracic deformities affects outcomes of permanent SCS placement. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Neural modulation via spinal cord stimulators (SCSs) has become an accepted treatment option for various chronic pain syndromes. In most cases, the surgeon desires accurate midline positioning of the paddle lead, allowing for flexibility of unilateral or bilateral coverage of pain patterns. Structural spinal deformities (scoliosis or kyphosis) often result from coronal, sagittal, and rotatory deformity that can make midline placement more difficult. METHODS: Between 2013 and 2017, two-hundred forty-one charts of patients who underwent permanent SCS placement at our suburban hospital were reviewed. Demographic information, numerical rating system (NRS) pain scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and opioid medication usage were recorded at baseline and after permanent stimulator placement. Thoracic scoliosis and kyphosis angles were measured using spinal radiographs. The effect of each structural deformity on NRS, ODI, and narcotic medication usage changes from baseline was analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 100 patients were included in our cohort. Fifty-six patients had measured thoracic spinal deformities (38% with scoliosis, 31% with kyphosis). There was no significant difference in NRS scores, ODI scores, or narcotic usage change between patients with scoliosis and those without (P = 0.66, P = 0.57, P = 0.75) or patients with kyphosis and those without (P = 0.51, P = 0.31, P = 0.63). Bivariate linear regression analysis showed that scoliotic and kyphotic angles were not significant predictors of NRS (P = 0.39, P = 0.13), ODI (P = 0.45, P = 0.07), and opioid usage (P = 0.70, P = 0.90) change, with multivariate regression analyses confirming these findings. CONCLUSION: SCSs can be effective options for treating lumbar back pain and radiculopathy. Our study suggests that the presence of mild structural deformities does not adversely affect outcomes of permanent SCS placement and as such should not preclude this population from benefiting from such therapies.Level of Evidence: 4.

Review of Physician Referrals to Orthopedic Spine versus Neurosurgery.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported what patients value while choosing their surgeon, but there are no studies exploring the patterns of referral to spine surgeons among primary care physicians (PCPs). This study aims to identify any trends in PCPs' referral to orthopedic surgery versus neurosurgery for spinal pathology. METHODS: In total, 450 internal medicine, family medicine, emergency medicine, neurology, and pain management physicians who practice at one of three locations (suburban community hospital, urban academic university hospital, and urban private practice) were asked to participate in the study. Consenting physicians completed our 24-question survey addressing their beliefs according to pathologies, locations of pathologies, and surgical interventions. RESULTS: Overall, 108 physicians (24%) completed our survey. Fifty-seven physicians (52.8%) felt that neurosurgeons would provide better long-term comprehensive spinal care. Overall, 66.7% of physicians would refer to neurosurgery for cervical spine radiculopathy; 52.8%, to neurosurgery for thoracic spine radiculopathy; and 56.5%, to orthopedics for lumbar spine radiculopathy. Most physicians would refer all spine fractures to orthopedics for treatment except cervical spine fractures (56.5% to neurosurgeons). Most physicians would refer to neurosurgery for extradural tumors (91.7%) and intradural tumors (96.3%). Most would refer to orthopedic surgeons for chronic pain. Finally, physicians would refer to orthopedics for spine fusion (61.1%) and discectomy (58.3%) and to neurosurgery for minimally invasive surgery (59.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Even though both orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons are intensively trained to treat a similar breath of spinal pathology, physicians vary in their referring patterns according to spinal pathology, location of pathology, and intended surgery. Education on the role of spine surgeons among PCPs is essential in ensuring unbiased referral patterns.

The operative treatment of shoulder pain in patients with a concurrent diagnosis of cervical spondylosis and shoulder dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Etiology of neck and shoulder pain may be multifactorial. When surgical intervention is indicated, the choice of whether to start with spine or shoulder surgery is an important clinical decision to make based on severity of pathologies, comorbidities, and patient preference. The literature includes with very few studies exploring the incidence or results of the surgical treatment paths followed in this clinical situation. This study compares patient-reported outcomes of patients with both cervical spine and shoulder pathology who underwent intervention for cervical, shoulder, or both pathologies. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed 154 charts at a single institution between 2009-2017 who had both cervical spine and shoulder pathology while undergoing operative intervention of one or both pathologies. For each patient, demographics, patient-perceived success, NRS pain scores, functional outcomes (Focus on Therapeutic Outcome scores and neck disability index scores), and post-operative opioid use were reported. RESULTS: Patient-reported success (P=0.85), NRS pain score decreases (P=0.45), all functional outcomes except for final external rotation range of motion (P=0.02), and post-operative opioid use (P=0.30) were similar when comparing only cervical spine to shoulder intervention. Success (P=1.00), NRS pain score decreases (P=0.37), both functional outcomes, and post-operative opioid use (P=0.08) were all similar when comparing patients who underwent cervical then shoulder intervention to shoulder then cervical intervention. Finally, statistical significance was found when comparing reported success (P=0.0004) but not NRS decreases (P=0.18), functional outcomes, or post-operative opioid use (P=0.43) in patients who underwent both operation types versus only one. CONCLUSIONS: Similar outcomes are seen when comparing isolated surgical intervention types and order of surgeries when undergoing both interventions. Multiple surgical intervention types, regardless of order, tends to result in higher rates of patient-reported success but similar post-operative outcomes compared to one.

Are CT Scans Overutilized in the Workup of Vertebral Compression Fractures?

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective chart review. OBJECTIVES: Computed tomography (CT) does not aid in determination of compression fracture chronicity and contributes to higher cost and radiation exposure. An examination of extraneous imaging will help to guide appropriate workup. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cost for osteoporotic fracture treatment has been estimated at $17 billion annually; future costs are anticipated to increase by at least 50%. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A chart review evaluated patients who received kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty as part of compression fracture treatment. The primary end point of the study was analysis of unnecessary imaging obtained during workup. The secondary outcome was excess radiation exposure incurred from unneeded imaging studies. RESULTS: There were 104 instances (40.2% of n=259 workups) where patients underwent only magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or bone scan after radiographs. There were 28 instances (10.8%) where patients underwent only radiographs with a comparison study. There were a total of 76 instances (29.3%) where patients underwent extraneous CT scans and 13 instances (5%) where patients underwent both MRI and bone scan, causing an average of 979.4 mGy cm additional radiation exposure. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend an algorithm that favors radiographs with comparison study or acquiring either MRI or bone scan to determine acuity. If these are available, CT scan becomes unnecessary and incurs increased costs and radiation exposure.

Spinal Cord Stimulators: A Comparison of the Trial Period Versus Permanent Outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to address and characterize the differences between pain relief obtained from the "trial" versus permanent stimulator in the acute postoperative period (less than 6 weeks). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: After a short stimulator trial (typically less than 7 days), patients who report at least a 50% relief are set up for permanent spinal cord stimulator (SCS) placement. The literature has shown that a subset of patients develop tolerance to these stimulating therapies, often resulting in reduced efficacy of symptom relief as early as 2 years post-permanent implantation. METHODS: Between the years of 2013 and 2017, 241 patient charts who underwent a successful trial and had a subsequent permanent SCS placed by a fellowship-trained surgeon through an open incision were reviewed. For each patient, demographic information, numerical rating system (NRS) pain scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and opioid medication usage were recorded and stratified by time-period (before trial, after trial and before permanent placement, and after permanent SCS placement). RESULTS: Of the 100 included patients, 60 were female; 60 patients had previous failed lumbar surgery (53%). Placement of trial stimulator (median = 4) decreased pain scores significantly more than permanent spinal cord stimulator did (median = 2) (P = 0.00). No significant difference was seen in ODI score difference between trial and initial scores (median = 4) and final and initial scores (median = 6) (P = 0.64). Finally, a significantly higher decrease in pain medication usage was seen after trial initiation (median = 0) versus after permanent spinal cord stimulator placement (median = 0) (P = 0.028). Twenty-two patients (22%) had reported complications, with 15 complaining of prolonged surgical site pain. CONCLUSION: Discrepancies observed in symptom alleviation between percutaneous trials and permanent placement in the acute 6-week postop period can have a significant effect on patient perceived outcomes. Understanding these issues will help in providing preoperative counseling and managing postoperative expectations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Multilevel critical stenosis with minimal functional deficits: a case of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

INTRODUCTION: We present a case of a previously asymptomatic and highly functional individual whose critical degenerative stenosis was exacerbated by recent trauma (motor vehicle accident), resulting in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 57-year-old African-American man with no significant past medical history presented to the Orthopaedic Surgery outpatient clinic with mild neck discomfort, stiffness, and bilateral hand numbness 4 days after being involved in a motor vehicle accident. He ambulated without assistive devices and displayed a tandem gait pattern with normal cadence. He was minimally tender to palpation at the posterior cervical midline and paraspinal musculature with motor and sensory function intact bilaterally. Reflexes were hypoactive at C5, C6, C7, L4, and S1 bilaterally with positive Babinski signs bilaterally. Imaging revealed degenerative changes, spinal stenosis, and cord compression. The patient eventually underwent posterior cervical decompression and fusion from the C3 to the C6 level, with the only reported complication being transient loss of somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) signals intra-operatively. In the postoperative period, the patient complained of stiffness in his left shoulder, elbow, and hand, as well as left hand palmar numbness and an inability to make a full fist. His complaints were managed with medication and physical therapy. DISCUSSION: This case report highlights the point that stenosis that occurs slowly over time is often well compensated, and patients are commonly asymptomatic at first glance. Often times, acute events tip patients from being asymptomatic to symptomatic, generally warranting invasive intervention to prevent further insults from causing permanent damage.