Low-Dose Methoxyflurane versus Standard of Care Analgesics for Emergency Trauma Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pooled Data.

PURPOSE: Undertreatment of trauma-related pain is common in the pre-hospital and hospital settings owing to barriers to the use of traditional standard of care analgesics. Low-dose methoxyflurane is an inhaled non-opioid analgesic with a rapid onset of pain relief that is approved for emergency relief of moderate-to-severe trauma-related pain in adults. This analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose methoxyflurane with standard of care analgesics in adults with trauma-related pain. METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed on pooled data from randomized controlled trials identified via a systematic review. The primary endpoint was the pain intensity difference between baseline and various time intervals (5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 minutes) after initiation of treatment. RESULTS: The pain intensity difference was statistically superior with low-dose methoxyflurane compared with standard of care analgesics (overall estimated treatment effect=11.88, 95% CI=9.75-14.00; P<0.0001). The superiority of low-dose methoxyflurane was demonstrated at 5 minutes after treatment initiation and was maintained across all timepoints. Significantly more patients treated with methoxyflurane achieved response criteria of pain intensity ≤30 mm on a visual analog scale, and relative reductions in pain intensity of ≥30% and ≥50%, compared with patients who received standard of care analgesics. The median time to pain relief was shorter with methoxyflurane than with standard of care analgesics. The findings were consistent in a subgroup of elderly patients (aged ≥65 years). CONCLUSION: Methoxyflurane can be considered as an alternative to standard of care analgesics in pre-hospital and hospital settings for treatment of adult patients with acute trauma-related pain.

Efficacy, Practicality, and Safety of Inhaled Methoxyflurane in Elderly Patients with Acute Trauma Pain: Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter, Open-Label Trial (MEDITA).

PURPOSE: Acute trauma pain management in the elderly population is a challenge. Inhaled methoxyflurane represents a promising treatment option; however, data in the elderly population are limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subgroup, post hoc analysis including 69 patients aged ≥65 years from a randomized, active-controlled, open-label study in the emergency setting. Key inclusion criterion was moderate-to-severe pain (Numerical Rating Scale [NRS] score ≥ 4]) secondary to trauma in a single limb. Patients received inhaled methoxyflurane (3 mL) or standard analgesic treatment (SAT; IV paracetamol 1 g or ketoprofen 100 mg for moderate pain [NRS 4-6] and IV morphine 0.1mg/kg for severe pain [NRS ≥7]). The primary endpoint was the overall change in visual analog scale (VAS) pain intensity from randomization to the next 3, 5, and 10 min. Secondary endpoints included time to onset of pain relief (TOPR), efficacy up to 30 min, judgment of operators and patients, and safety. RESULTS: Pain reduction over time was similar in both groups. Median TOPR was shorter for methoxyflurane (9 min; 95% CI: 7.8, 10.2 min) than SAT (15 min; 95% CI: 10.2, 19.8 min). In terms of treatment satisfaction, patients and operators rated treatment efficacy and practicality, respectively, as "Excellent" or "Very good" 5.7 times and 3.4 times more frequently than SAT. A similar rate of adverse events (methoxyflurane: 6 events; SAT: 7 events) was recorded, all non-serious. No clinically significant changes in vital signs parameters were observed, and methoxyflurane did not result in cases of bradycardia or hypotension. CONCLUSION: In elderly patients with trauma pain, inhaled methoxyflurane shows similar pain relief and safety compared to SAT, offering advantages in terms of onset of effect and user's satisfaction. Although this analysis presents some methodological limitations, it provides the first specific evidence of the use of inhaled methoxyflurane in the elderly population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number: 2017-001565-25; Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03585374.

Inhaled Methoxyflurane versus Intravenous Morphine for Severe Trauma Pain in the Emergency Setting: Subgroup Analysis of MEDITA, a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial.

PURPOSE: Opioid analgesics remain the cornerstone of treatment for severe trauma pain in the emergency setting, but there are barriers to their use. This post hoc analysis of a previously reported trial (MEDITA) investigated the efficacy and safety of low-dose methoxyflurane versus intravenous (IV) morphine for severe trauma pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MEDITA was a Phase IIIb, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label study in Italian pre-hospital units and emergency departments (EudraCT: 2017-001565-25; NCT03585374). Adult patients (N=272) with moderate-to-severe trauma pain (score ≥4 on the Numerical Rating Scale [NRS]) were randomized 1:1 to inhaled methoxyflurane (3 mL) or standard analgesic treatment (SAT; IV paracetamol 1g or ketoprofen 100mg for moderate pain [NRS 4-6] and IV morphine 0.1mg/kg for severe pain [NRS ≥7]). Analyses were performed for the severe pain subgroup. The primary efficacy variable was the overall change from baseline in visual analog scale (VAS) pain intensity at 3, 5 and 10min post-randomization. Non-inferiority of methoxyflurane versus morphine was concluded if the upper 95% confidence interval (CI) for the treatment difference was <1; superiority was concluded if the upper 95% CI was <0. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients (methoxyflurane: 49; SAT: 44) were included in the severe pain intention-to-treat population. The reduction in VAS pain intensity over the first 10min was superior for methoxyflurane versus morphine (adjusted mean treatment difference: -5.54mm; 95% CI: -10.49, -0.59mm; p=0.029). Median time to onset of pain relief was 9min for methoxyflurane and 15min for morphine. Patients rated treatment efficacy and physicians rated treatment practicality "Excellent" or "Very good" for more methoxyflurane-treated patients (42.8% and 67.3%) than morphine-treated patients (18.1% and 22.8%). Adverse events, all non-serious, were reported in 20.4% of methoxyflurane-treated patients and in 4.8% of morphine-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Methoxyflurane provided superior short-term pain relief to IV morphine in patients with severe trauma pain and offers an effective non-narcotic treatment option.

Analgesic Efficacy, Practicality and Safety of Inhaled Methoxyflurane Versus Standard Analgesic Treatment for Acute Trauma Pain in the Emergency Setting: A Randomised, Open-Label, Active-Controlled, Multicentre Trial in Italy (MEDITA).

INTRODUCTION: Inhaled low-dose methoxyflurane is approved in Europe for emergency relief of moderate-to-severe trauma-related pain in adults, but data versus active comparators are sparse. The phase IIIb Methoxyflurane in Emergency Department in ITAly (MEDITA) trial investigated the analgesic efficacy, practicality and safety of methoxyflurane versus standard analgesic treatment (SAT) for acute trauma pain. METHODS: This was a randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label trial conducted in 15 Italian emergency units. Adults with limb trauma and pain score ≥ 4 on numerical rating scale (NRS) were randomised 1:1 to inhaled methoxyflurane 3 mL or SAT [intravenously administered (IV) morphine 0.1 mg/kg for severe pain (NRS ≥ 7); IV paracetamol 1 g or IV ketoprofen 100 mg for moderate pain (NRS 4-6)]. The primary endpoint was overall change in visual analogue scale (VAS) pain intensity from baseline (time of randomisation) to 3, 5 and 10 min. Non-inferiority and superiority of methoxyflurane versus SAT were concluded if the upper 95% confidence interval (CI) for the treatment comparison (methoxyflurane-SAT) was less than 1 and less than 0, respectively. RESULTS: Between 8 February 2018 and 8 February 2019, 272 patients were randomised (136 per treatment group). A total of 270 patients (mean age 51 years; 49% male; 34% with severe pain; mean baseline VAS 67 mm) were treated and analysed for efficacy and safety. Superiority of methoxyflurane was demonstrated for moderate-to-severe pain (adjusted mean treatment difference - 5.94 mm; 95% CI - 8.83, - 3.06 mm), moderate pain (- 5.97 mm; 95% CI - 9.55, - 2.39 mm) and severe pain (- 5.54 mm; 95% CI - 10.49, - 0.59 mm). Median onset of pain relief was 9 min for methoxyflurane and 15 min for SAT. Practicality of methoxyflurane treatment was rated "Excellent", "Very Good" or "Good" by 90% of clinicians vs. 64% for SAT. Adverse events (all non-serious) were reported by 17% of methoxyflurane-treated patients and 3% of SAT-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Methoxyflurane provided superior pain relief to SAT in patients with moderate-to-severe trauma pain and may offer a simple, fast, effective non-opioid treatment option. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registered with EudraCT (2017-001565-25) on 2 March 2018 and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03585374) on 13 July 2018. FUNDING: Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals S.r.l.

Methoxyflurane Versus Standard of Care for Acute Trauma-Related Pain in the Emergency Setting: Protocol for a Randomised, Controlled Study in Italy (MEDITA).

INTRODUCTION: Low-dose methoxyflurane, administered via a hand-held inhaler, has been used for short-term pain relief in emergency medicine in Australia and New Zealand for over 40 years, and was recently approved in Europe for the rapid relief of moderate-to-severe trauma-related pain in adults. There is currently a lack of data for methoxyflurane versus active comparators, therefore this trial will investigate the efficacy and safety of inhaled methoxyflurane compared with standard of care (SoC) in the treatment of acute trauma-related pain in pre-hospital and ED settings in Italy. METHODS: MEDITA (Methoxyflurane in Emergency Department in ITAly) is a Phase IIIb, prospective, randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre trial. A total of 272 adult patients with moderate-to-severe pain [score ≥ 4 on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)] due to limb trauma will be randomised 1:1 to receive 3 mL methoxyflurane (self-administered by the patient via inhalation under supervision of a trained person) or medications that currently comprise the SoC in Italy [intravenous (IV) morphine for severe pain (NRS ≥ 7); IV paracetamol or ketoprofen for moderate pain (NRS 4-6)], administered as soon as possible after randomisation. PLANNED OUTCOMES: Pain intensity will be measured using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) at baseline (time of randomisation) and at intervals up to 30 min. Time of onset of pain relief as reported by the patient and use of rescue medication will be recorded. The patient will rate the efficacy and the healthcare professional will rate the practicality of study treatment at 30 min after randomisation using a 5-point Likert scale. Adverse events will be recorded until safety follow-up at 14 ± 2 days. Vital signs will be measured at baseline, 10 and 30 min. The primary aim is to demonstrate non-inferiority of methoxyflurane versus SoC for the change in VAS pain intensity from baseline (randomisation) to 3, 5 and 10 min. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number: 2017-001565-25. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03585374. FUNDING: Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals srl.

Prospective, Multicentre Trial of Methoxyflurane for Acute Trauma-Related Pain in Helicopter Emergency Medical Systems and Hostile Environments: METEORA Protocol.

INTRODUCTION: The inhalational analgesic low-dose methoxyflurane has been widely used by Australian ambulance services since 1975 and is now approved in Europe for emergency relief of moderate-to-severe trauma-related pain in conscious adult patients. The use of methoxyflurane in hostile environments is of special interest given its portability, ease of use and rapid onset of action. This trial will investigate the efficacy, tolerability and practicality of use of inhaled methoxyflurane in patients with moderate-to-severe trauma-related pain rescued from hostile mountainous environments by the Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) in Italy. METHODS: METEORA is a phase IIIb, prospective, single-arm, multicentre trial. Approximately 200 adult patients with a pain score of at least 4 on the numerical rating scale (NRS) due to limb trauma rescued by HEMS will be enrolled. Patients will receive up to 2 × 3 mL methoxyflurane, self-administered by the patient by inhalation under medical supervision. Rescue medication will be permitted if required. PLANNED OUTCOMES: Pain intensity will be measured using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) at baseline, at 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45 and 60 min after the start of methoxyflurane inhalation and when positioning the patient on a spinal board or stretcher; and also using the NRS at enrolment and at 10 min. Use of rescue medication (yes/no) will be recorded. The patient will rate efficacy and the healthcare professional will rate practicality of methoxyflurane treatment at 30 and 60 min using a 5-point Likert scale. Vital signs will be measured at baseline, 10, 30 and 60 min. Assessments after 30 min will only be performed for patients using a second inhaler. Adverse events will be recorded until safety follow-up at 3 ± 1 days. The primary endpoint is the percentage of patients achieving at least 30% improvement from baseline in VAS pain intensity within the first 10 min of methoxyflurane administration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number: 2017-004601-40. FUNDING: Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals, srl. Plain language summary available for this article.

Power Doppler sonography and clinical monitoring for hyaluronic Acid treatment of rhizarthrosis: a pilot study.

Trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint osteoarthritis (OA) is a common disabling condition in which the impact of visco-supplementation has to be ascertained. We aim to evaluate the efficacy of high molecular weight hyaluronic acid (HA) ultrasound (US)-guided intra-articular injection of TMC joints in OA. 32 TMC joints of 16 patients with symptomatic thumb base OA were treated with three injections of high molecular weight HA at 1-week intervals. Before injection, at week 0, 1, 2, and 24 all patients underwent clinical and US examination. A significant clinical improvement was obtained by the decrease in visual analog scale for pain after 2 weeks of treatment (p = 0.0003) and this result is maintained at week 24 (p = 0.009). The Dreiser's index also decreased after week 2 and remain stable after 6 months. Power Doppler signal significantly decreased after 2 weeks of treatment (p = 0.02), even if this result was not maintained at week 24. No significant decrease in the synovial hypertrophy score was observed during the study. Our preliminary study suggests that US-guided TMC injections by high molecular weight HA may be effective in decreasing local inflammation and pain.

Inflammatory and prothrombotic biomarkers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: effects of tumor necrosis factor-alpha blockade.

OBJECTIVE: Increased cardiovascular (CV) risk is a rheumatoid arthritis (RA) hallmark and it has been mainly related to chronic systemic inflammation. Since inflammation is linked to coagulation perturbation, both may play a role in increasing CV risk. Treatment with tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha blocking agents is effective in RA and reduces local and systemic inflammation but there is little information on its effect on coagulation. We therefore investigated inflammation and coagulation plasma biomarkers before and after infliximab treatment in RA patients. METHODS: We studied 20 patients with active RA and 40 healthy controls. Patients were treated with: a stable dose of methotrexate (10mg/week), and infliximab (3mg/kg) at weeks 0, 2, 6 and 14. At baseline and week 14, we determined: disease activity score (DAS-28), visual analogue scale pain, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), TNF-alpha, interleukin (IL)-6, prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2) and D-dimer. The same inflammation and coagulation parameters were evaluated 1h after infliximab infusion in 10 patients. RESULTS: At baseline, ESR, CRP, TNF-alpha, IL-6, F1+2 and D-dimer levels were significantly higher in RA patients than in controls (P=0.0001). After 14weeks of infliximab treatment, there was a significant clinical improvement and ESR and CRP, IL-6, F1+2 and D-dimer level decrease (P=0.001-P=0.008). The levels of TNF-alpha, IL-6, F1+2 and D-dimer significantly decreased 1h after infliximab infusion (P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab decreases inflammation and coagulation biomarkers in RA patients. Such a combined effect may be pivotal in reducing the whole thrombotic risk in these patients.

Use of antibodies recognizing cyclic citrullinated peptide in the differential diagnosis of joint involvement in systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies in systemic sclerosis (SSc) and to assess any association between the presence of anti-CCP, radiographic features, and clinical manifestations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Anti-CCP antibodies and rheumatoid factor (RF) were tested in serum samples from 75 patients with SSc (64 women and 11 men), with a mean age of 59.4 years (range 24-85) with either diffuse (dcSSc) and limited (lcSSc) cutaneous involvement. As a control group, 22 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs) were examined. Standard radiographs of the hands and wrists were examined in each patient. RESULTS: The presence of anti-CCP was found in sera of 10.6% (8/75) patients with SSc (lcSSc 3 of 44, 6.8%; dcSSc 5 of 31, 16.1%). None of the HCs was positive for anti-CCP. The positivity of RF was observed in 19 of 75 (25.3%) SSc patients (lcSSc 10 of 44, 22.7%; dcSSc 9 of 31, 29%). Statistically significant association was found between anti-CCP positivity and the presence of arthritis (p<0.0001) and marginal erosions (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Our data show that joint involvement is a common presenting feature of SSc. In this report, we show that anti-CCP antibodies can be detected also in patients with SSc, but they are generally less commonly present than in adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Thus, the finding of high titers of anti-CCP antibodies may help to define the diagnosis of overlap syndrome SSc/RA and facilitate diagnosis and appropriate treatment.

Evaluation of nailfold videocapillaroscopic abnormalities in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: Nailfold capillaroscopy (NFC) has been shown to have a remarkable value in the differential diagnosis of connective tissue diseases. In fact, NFC patterns reflect the microvascular changes that may play a significant role in pathogenesis. The aims of this study were to determine in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) the prevalence of NFC patterns, to evaluate any association with clinical features and laboratory parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-three patients with SLE were included in this retrospective study. Video NFC parameters were analyzed in each patient. In all cases, the following parameters were evaluated: capillary arrangement, density, size, and shape. RESULTS: In patients with SLE, major capillary abnormalities were frequently observed (44 of 123 = 35.8%); however, no specific pattern was noted. There was a significant correlation between the SLEDAI index and the severity of capillary abnormalities (P < 0.0001). Pathologic capillary abnormalities were also significantly increased in SLE with positive anti-U1-RNP antibodies (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: NFC may be a useful method to evaluate the microvascular changes in patients with SLE, and the presence of major capillary abnormalities seems to herald a more severe clinical course of the illness.