The Phenomenon of Thrombotic Microangiopathy in Cancer Patients.

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) encompasses a range of disorders characterized by blood clotting in small blood vessels, leading to organ damage. It can manifest as various syndromes, including thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS), and others, each with distinct causes and pathophysiology. Thrombo-inflammation plays a significant role in TMA pathogenesis: inflammatory mediators induce endothelial injury and activation of platelet and coagulation cascade, contributing to microvascular thrombosis. Primary TMA, such as TTP, is primarily caused by deficient ADAMTS13 metalloproteinase activity, either due to antibody-mediated inhibition or intrinsic enzyme synthesis defects. In cancer patients, a significant reduction in ADAMTS13 levels and a corresponding increase in VWF levels is observed. Chemotherapy further decreased ADAMTS13 levels and increased VWF levels, leading to an elevated VWF/ADAMTS13 ratio and increased thrombotic risk. Drug-induced TMA (DITMA) can result from immune-mediated or non-immune-mediated mechanisms. Severe cases of COVID-19 may lead to a convergence of syndromes, including disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), and TMA. Treatment of TMA involves identifying the underlying cause, implementing therapies to inhibit complement activation, and providing supportive care to manage complications. Plasmapheresis may be beneficial in conditions like TTP. Prompt diagnosis and treatment are crucial to prevent serious complications and improve outcomes.

The Hemostatic System in Newborns and the Risk of Neonatal Thrombosis.

Newborns are the most vulnerable patients for thrombosis development among all children, with critically ill and premature infants being in the highest risk group. The upward trend in the rate of neonatal thrombosis could be attributed to progress in the treatment of severe neonatal conditions and the increased survival in premature babies. There are physiological differences in the hemostatic system between neonates and adults. Neonates differ in concentrations and rate of synthesis of most coagulation factors, turnover rates, the ability to regulate thrombin and plasmin, and in greater variability compared to adults. Natural inhibitors of coagulation (protein C, protein S, antithrombin, heparin cofactor II) and vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors (factors II, VII, IX, X) are low, but factor VIII and von Willebrand factor are elevated. Newborns have decreased fibrinolytic activity. In the healthy neonate, the balance is maintained but appears more easily converted into thrombosis. Neonatal hemostasis has less buffer capacity, and almost 95% of thrombosis is provoked. Different triggering risk factors are responsible for thrombosis in neonates, but the most important risk factors for thrombosis are central catheters, fluid fluctuations, liver dysfunction, and septic and inflammatory conditions. Low-molecular-weight heparins are the agents of choice for anticoagulation.

Hydroxychloroquine in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: rationale and results of an observational study of refractory cases.

BACKGROUND: The current recommended therapy of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a long-term anticoagulant therapy that affects the final event, namely, when the thrombosis has already occurred. Unfortunately, this schedule is not always effective and fails despite the correct risk stratification and an adequate adjusted dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2013 to 2020 we observed 217 women with antiphospholipid antibodies and obstetric morbidities who were treated with conventional treatment protocol (aspirin low doses ± LMWH). Among them 150 (69.1%) successfully completed pregnancy with delivery and live birth on the background of LMWH and aspirin therapy and in 67 (30.9%) women despite a traditional therapy regimen, obstetric complications were noted. Later, 56 of these 67 women became pregnant again and were offered traditional therapy plus hydroxychloroquine. Fifteen women refused HCQ treatment due to possible potential side effects. The final cohort consisted of 41 women with positive antiphospholipid antibodies and obstetric and thrombotic complications who received LMWH, aspirin low doses and HCQ at a dose of 200-400mg per day from the beginning of pregnancy. RESULTS: Forty-one aPL women treated with HCQ after failed previous anticoagulant therapy had live births in 32 cases (78%). Adding of HCQ to the combination of LMWH and LDA showed good overall obstetric results and increased the number of live births in another 32 women. So, a total of 182 (83.8%) of initial 217 aPL-women ended their pregnancies with live birth after adding the HCQ to the traditional therapy with LMWH and low doses of aspirin. CONCLUSION: In 20-30% of cases the live birth despite anticoagulation cannot be achieved. Perhaps APS is not just anticoagulation. The study of pathophysiological mechanisms suggests that some patients will benefit from other therapy (in addition to anticoagulant). Therapy that affects the early effects of aPL on target cells (monocytes, endothelial cells, etc.) or before binding to receptors-this therapy will be preferable and potentially less harmful than the officially accepted one to date. From this point of view, HCQ looks promising and can be used as an alternative candidate for women with refractory obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome. Adding HCQ should be considered in some selected patients with failed pregnancy after treatment with anticoagulants.

Unusual thrombosis or pregnancy complications associated to ovarian cancers: two clinical cases.

AIM: Using illustrative cases of two patients with ovarian cancer who developed unusual thrombosis in pregnancy, to describe the difficulties in diagnosing and managing such patients. METHODS: We present the analysis of two cases of thrombosis of unusual localization (central artery of the retina and transverse and sigmoid sinus thrombosis) during pregnancy in women with hidden ovarian cancer. RESULTS: In both cases, the symptomatic of unususal thrombosis was interpreted as a manifestation of eclampsia, leading to a choice of non-optimal obstetric tactics on a background of hidden ovarian cancer, which in both cases were diagnosed only postpartum. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy itself is a risk factor for thrombotic complications and in case malignancy develops in parallel with pregnancy, this risk is multiplied. In patients with ovarian cancer, difficulties arise both in detecting the tumor itself due to the enlarged uterus and in interpreting some of the symptoms, which can be regarded as a manifestation of pregnancy complications.