Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Animals (Basel) ; 10(6)2020 Jun 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32560466

RESUMEN

We performed this study to characterize the difference between the inflammatory and non-inflammatory status in diseased dogs by measuring salivary C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. In addition, we assessed whether a correlation exists between CRP levels in saliva and those in serum. CRP levels were measured in 32 client-owned dogs, which were then divided into inflammation and non-inflammation groups based on the serum CRP level. The salivary CRP level was higher in the inflammation group than in the non-inflammation group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, there was a positive correlation between the salivary and serum CRP levels (R = 0.866, p < 0.001). These data suggest that canine salivary CRP measurements can effectively and non-invasively detect an inflammatory state in dogs.

2.
J Vet Intern Med ; 33(2): 531-535, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30548689

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although the demand for esomeprazole is increasing in veterinary medicine, the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics of esomeprazole have been described in only a few studies. OBJECTIVE: To determine the PK of 0.5 and 1 mg/kg esomeprazole administered IV q12h and to investigate its effects on intragastric pH in healthy dogs. ANIMALS: Six adult Beagles. METHODS: Open-label, randomized, and crossover design. The dogs received 0.5 or 1 mg/kg esomeprazole IV q12h for 48 hours. Plasma concentrations of esomeprazole were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Intragastric pH was determined using the Bravo pH monitoring system and recorded as mean percentage time (MPT) for which pH was ≥3 and ≥4 for 24 hours in each group. RESULTS: The peak plasma concentration and area under the curve from the time of dosing to the last measurable concentration in the 1 mg/kg group were higher than those in the 0.5 mg/kg group. However, when the dosage normalized, intergroup differences were not significant. The MPTs for which intragastric pH was ≥3 and ≥4 for 48 hours were 88% ± 7% and 81% ± 9% for the 0.5 mg/kg group and 90% ± 9% and 85% ± 11% for the 1 mg/kg group, respectively, with no significant intergroup differences. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The pharmacokinetic parameters and acid suppressant effect for 0.5 and 1 mg/kg esomeprazole were not significantly different. Furthermore, the efficacy of esomeprazole 0.5 mg/kg IV q12h was sufficient to increase intragastric pH in Beagles.


Asunto(s)
Antiulcerosos/farmacología , Perros/metabolismo , Esomeprazol/farmacología , Animales , Antiulcerosos/administración & dosificación , Antiulcerosos/farmacocinética , Área Bajo la Curva , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión/veterinaria , Estudios Cruzados , Perros/sangre , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esomeprazol/administración & dosificación , Esomeprazol/farmacocinética , Ácido Gástrico/metabolismo , Determinación de la Acidez Gástrica/veterinaria , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno/efectos de los fármacos , Inyecciones Intravenosas/veterinaria , Distribución Aleatoria
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA