Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil ; 31(5): 923-930, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29945341

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Optimal seatback angles for automobile drivers' seats have been investigated based on comfort and back muscle activities; however, radiology supported evidences are scarce. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate optimal range of the seatback reclining regarding torso angles for an automobile driver's seat to preserve lumbar lordosis. METHODS: Thirty-one healthy volunteers were recruited among five body type categories. Lateral lumbar spine X-rays were obtained for the neutral sitting posture without seatback (reference), and with reclining angles of 23∘ to 33∘ by 2∘ intervals. The Cobb angles for the L1-L4, L4-S1, and L1-S1 segments were measured. RESULTS: The Cobb angle for L4-S1 was nearest to the reference (18.74 ± 1.57∘, mean ± standard error mean) at reclining angles of 29∘ and 31∘ (14.51 ± 1.41∘ and 14.47 ± 1.43∘, respectively). The Cobb angle at L4-S1 between reclining angles of 27∘(12.02 ± 1.31∘) and 29∘ (14.51 ± 1.41∘) were significantly different (p< 0.001). Tall men showed relatively preserved lordosis angles at all reclining angles. Fat men and short women demonstrated prominent loss of lordosis with excessively kyphotic L1-L4 segment. CONCLUSIONS: Reclining angles of 29∘ to 31∘ revealed to be optimal for preserving lordosis at the L4-S1 segment. Individualized healthcare-related guideline for driver's seat adjustment setting is necessary.


Asunto(s)
Conducción de Automóvil , Lordosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Región Lumbosacra/diagnóstico por imagen , Postura/fisiología , Adulto , Femenino , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...