RESUMEN
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the expression of mitogen activated protein kinase phosphatase-1(MKP-1)in pancreatic cancer.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Totally 60 cases of normal pancreas, chronic pancreatitis(CP), and pancreatic cancer tissues were collected by operation in our hospital. Pancreatic tissues were analyzed by Northern blot analysis and Western blot analysis. Meanwhile, MKP-1 expression was detected in 6 pancreatic cancer cell lines by Western blot analysis.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Northern blot analysis of total RNA revealed relatively low MKP-1 mRNA expression in 7 of 20(35%)normal pancreatic samples. In the remaining 13 samples, the MKP-1 mRNA was absent to faint detectable. In 7 of the 20 CP samples, MKP-1 was demonstrated moderate to high expression. In contrast, 12 of 20(60%)pancreatic cancer samples MKP-1 mRNA was expressed at high levels, whereas in the remaining 8 cancer tissues this mRNA moiety was present at low to moderate levels. Densitometric analysis with normalization to 7S revealed that the median level of MKP-1 mRNA in CP and cancerous tissues was increased by 6.2 folds(P=0.035)and 8.1 folds(P=0.016)in comparison with the median level in the normal pancreatic samples, respectively. Overexpression of MKP-1 was also found in 6 pancreatic cancer cell lines, in which the expression of MKP-1 was slightly lower in one pancreatic cancer cell line but high in the remaining 5 cell lines.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>MKP-1 is over-expressed in pancreatic cancer, CP tissues, and pancreatic cell lines. It is speculated that MKP-1 may play an important role in tumorigenesis of pancreatic cancer.</p>
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Northern Blotting , Western Blotting , Fosfatasa 1 de Especificidad Dual , Metabolismo , Inmunohistoquímica , Páncreas , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Metabolismo , ARN MensajeroRESUMEN
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate the prognostic factors related to triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) by analyzing clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment and prognosis.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Three hundred and five TNBC patients treated between January 2004 and December 2011 were enrolled and retrospectively reviewed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. All patients were females and the age onset were 24-82 years old (the median were 50 years old).</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The follow-up period was 1 to 114 months, with median 38 months. The 5-year disease free survival (DFS) rate was 68% and overall survival (OS) rate 75%. The peak risk of recurrence occurs within the first 2-3 years after initial treatment of the disease, but distant relapse after this time is much less common. Survival analysis showed that surgery type (χ(2) = 4.030, P = 0.045), tumor grade (χ(2) = 8.000, P = 0.046), lymph-vascular invasion (χ(2) = 10.386, P = 0.001) and lymph node stage (χ(2) = 119.36, P = 0.000), TNM stage (χ(2) = 65.961, P = 0.000) and treatment plan (χ(2) = 28.371, 21.874, 32.163, all P = 0.000) were statistically related to DFS; while age (χ(2) = 10.226, P = 0.006), lymph-vascular invasion (χ(2) = 18.881, P = 0.000), lymph node stage (χ(2) = 98.958, P = 0.000), TNM stage (χ(2) = 65.342, P = 0.000) and type of treatment (χ(2) = 17.862, 18.708, 31.921, all P = 0.000) were related to OS. The lymph nodes stage was prognostic factor related to both DFS and OS.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>TNBC was characterized by poor prognosis and rapid progression. The lymph nodes metastatic status was the most important prognostic factor of TNBC.</p>
Asunto(s)
Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Ganglios Linfáticos , Patología , Metástasis Linfática , Patología , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas , Diagnóstico , PatologíaRESUMEN
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>Mammography is the principle imaging modality used for early diagnosis of breast cancer in Western countries. It has not been well-established whether this Western diagnostic modality is adoptable for Chinese women. The aim of this study was to evaluate the respective accuracy of the common diagnostic tools for breast cancer including history-taking, physical examination, ultrasound and mammography.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Clinical presentation and investigations for consecutive patients undergoing history-taking, physical examination, ultrasound, mammography and pathological assessment at Peking Union Medical College Hospital were prospectively recorded between April 2010 and September 2011. Breast cancer high-risk factors acquired by history-taking were input into the risk assessment model established previously by Eleventh Five Year Key Programs for Science and Technology Development of China (Grant No. 2006BAI02A09) and classified into low-, medium-, high- and extremely high-risk groups. The low- and medium-risk groups were defined as test negative, while the high- and extremely high-risk groups were defined as test positive. Each mammogram and ultrasound was reported prospectively using a five-point reporting scale of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). Clinical data were compared with pathological findings. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PRV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of respective diagnostic methods were calculated and compared. The patients were divided into two groups, above and below 50 years of age for subgroup analysis.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>A total of 1468 patients (1475 breast lesions) constituted the study population. The median age was 44 (range 13 - 92) years. Five hundred and fifty-one patients were diagnosed as breast cancer. The median age at diagnosis was 51 years and breast cancer peaked in the age group of 40 - 60 years. The sensitivity of risk assessment model, physical examination, ultrasound and mammogram was 47.5%, 86.2%, 89.8% and 79.3%, respectively; specificity was 68.8%, 83.3%, 81.0% and 88.7%, respectively; PRV was 47.6%, 75.5%, 73.8% and 80.8%, respectively; NPV was 68.8%, 91.0%, 93.0% and 87.8%, respectively; and accuracy was 60.9%, 84.4%, 84.3% and 85.2%, respectively. Further subgroup analysis demonstrated that age is an important factor influencing the sensitivity and specificity of physical examination, ultrasound and mammography.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Ultrasound is more sensitive than mammography for early diagnosis of breast cancer in Chinese women and should be routinely used as a first-line diagnostic tool. Only a single diagnostic method is not enough sometimes and combined examination is needed for some high-risk populations.</p>