Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Trop Pediatr ; 70(2)2024 02 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38324898

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The incidence of neonatal septic shock in low-income countries is 26.8% with a mortality rate of 35.4%. The evidence of the hemodynamic effects of noradrenaline in neonates remains sparse. This study was carried out to evaluate the effects of noradrenaline in neonates with septic shock. METHODS: This was a single-center prospective cohort study in a tertiary care hospital's level III neonatal intensive care unit. Neonates with septic shock and those who received noradrenaline as a first-line vasoactive agent were included. Clinical and hemodynamic parameters were recorded before and after one hour of noradrenaline infusion. The primary outcomes were: response at the end of one hour after starting noradrenaline infusion and mortality rate. RESULTS: A total of 21 babies were analyzed. The cohort comprised 17 preterm neonates. The mean age of presentation with septic shock was 74.3 h. Resolution of shock at one hour after starting noradrenaline was achieved in 76.2% of cases. The median duration of hospital stay was 14 days. The mean blood pressure improved after the initiation of noradrenaline from 30.6 mm of Hg [standard deviation (SD) 6.1] to 37.8 mm of Hg (SD 8.22, p < 0.001). Fractional shortening improved after noradrenaline initiation from 29% (SD 13.5) to 45.1% (SD 21.1, p < 0.001). The mortality rate was 28.6% in our study. CONCLUSION: Noradrenaline is a potential drug for use in neonatal septic shock, with improvement in mean blood pressure and fractional shortening; however, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm our findings before it can be recommended as first-line therapy in neonatal septic shock.


Neonatal sepsis is one of the leading causes of neonatal mortality. In neonates with septic shock, mortality is high at 35.4% in low- and middle-income countries. The evidence of the hemodynamic effects of noradrenaline in neonates is still sparse, so we carried out a study in our tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit to evaluate the effects of noradrenaline in neonates with septic shock. Neonates with septic shock and those who received noradrenaline as a first-line vasoactive agent were included. Clinical and hemodynamic parameters were recorded before and after one hour of noradrenaline infusion. The primary outcomes were: response at the end of one hour after starting noradrenaline infusion and mortality rate. A total of 21 babies were analyzed. We found that there was a statistically significant improvement in the mean blood pressure and fractional shortening after noradrenaline initiation. The mortality rate was 28.6% in our study. We conclude that noradrenaline is a relatively safe and effective drug for the treatment of neonatal septic shock. However, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm our findings before it can be recommended as first-line therapy in neonatal septic shock.


Asunto(s)
Mercurio , Choque Séptico , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Norepinefrina/farmacología , Norepinefrina/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Hemodinámica , Mercurio/farmacología
2.
BMC Pediatr ; 22(1): 311, 2022 05 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35624452

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sildenafil is the drug of choice for neonatal pulmonary hypertension in developing countries where inhaled nitric oxide is not available. Available as oral and intravenous preparation - no study has been done in the past to compare the two forms. Each has its own benefits - but requires comparison in terms of efficacy and safety. This study was done to compare the efficacy of oral versus intravenous (IV) sildenafil in infants with mild to moderate pulmonary hypertension. METHODS: An open labelled randomized trial was conducted in a neonatal intensive care unit of urban tertiary hospital in western India between February 2019 to December 2020. Infants born after 34 weeks of gestation with Pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) > 25 mm Hg measured by echocardiography, within 72 h of birth, were enrolled for the study. Participants were randomly assigned to receive sildenafil either orally or by intravenous route. Primary outcome was the time taken for PAP to decrease below 25 mm Hg. Secondary outcomes were time taken for oxygenation index to decrease by 25%, duration of invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation, nasal oxygen, hospital stay, time to achieve full feeds, mortality, and side effects. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled. The baseline characteristics of neonates in both groups were similar except for APGAR scores at 1 min and 5 min, with oral group having lower score [MEDIAN (IQR) 5.00 (4.00- 7.00) and 7.00 (6.00- 8.00)] compared to IV group [MEDIAN (IQR) 7.00 (6.00-8.00) and 9.00 (8.00-9.00)] respectively. Time taken for PAP to decrease below 25 mm was not statistically different between the oral and intravenous groups. Systemic hypotension occurred in 4 neonates of the intravenous group but none in the oral group. CONCLUSION: Oral and intravenous sildenafil had equal efficacy at reducing PAP in neonatal pulmonary hypertension, albeit intravenous sildenafil use was associated with a greater complication rate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial was registered in the clinical trials registry of India [ CTRI/2019/04/018781 ][25/04/2019].


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión Pulmonar , Humanos , Hipertensión Pulmonar/etiología , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Piperazinas , Purinas/uso terapéutico , Citrato de Sildenafil/uso terapéutico , Sulfonas/uso terapéutico , Vasodilatadores/uso terapéutico
3.
Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med ; 7(4): 201-208, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33319021

RESUMEN

Mechanical ventilation is a lifesaving intervention in critically ill preterm and term neonates. However, it has the potential to cause significant damage to the lungs resulting in long-term complications. Understanding the pathophysiological process and having a good grasp of the basic concepts of conventional and high-frequency ventilation is essential for any medical or allied healthcare practitioner involved in the neonates' respiratory management. This review aims to describe the various types and modes of ventilation usually available in neonatal units. It also describes recommendations of an individualized disease-based approach to mechanical ventilation strategies implemented in the authors' institutions.

4.
Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med ; 7(1): 13-18, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32373697

RESUMEN

Mechanical ventilation is potentially live saving in neonatal patients with respiratory failure. The main purpose of mechanical ventilation is to ensure adequate gas exchange, including delivery of adequate oxygenation and enough ventilation for excretion of CO2. The possibility to measure and deliver small flows and tidal volumes have allowed to develop very sophisticated modes of assisted mechanical ventilation for the most immature neonates, such as volume targeted ventilation, which is used more and more by many clinicians. Use of mechanical ventilation requires a basic understanding of respiratory physiology and pathophysiology of the disease leading to respiratory failure. Understanding pulmonary mechanics, elastic and resistive forces (compliance and resistance), and its influence on the inspiratory and expiratory time constant, and the mechanisms of gas exchange are necessary to choose the best mode of ventilation and adequate ventilator settings to minimize lung injury. Considering the pathophysiology of the disease allows a physiology-based approach and application of these concepts in daily practice for decision making regarding the use of modes and settings of mechanical ventilation, with the ultimate aim of providing adequate gas exchange and minimising lung injury.

5.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 28(14): 1736-9, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25241768

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of pulse-oximetry as a screening tool in the detection of critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) in newborns. METHODS: Post-natal babies born between 01/01/2007-31/12/2009 were eligible. Post-ductal pulse-oximetry was performed using Nellcor® NPB 40 pulse oximeter with reusable OXI-A/N saturation probe. Saturations ≥95% were deemed normal. If saturations were <95%, an echocardiogram was done. The regional paediatric cardiology database and death records identified babies later diagnosed with CCHD. RESULTS: 6329/9613 eligible babies were studied and pulse-oximetry was performed at a mean age of 28 hours (range 6-72 hours). Fourteen babies had saturations <95%. CCHD was diagnosed in 7/14 babies; 4/7 had no clinical signs. Of the remaining 7 babies, 3 had non-critical but significant CHD and 4 had an undiagnosed respiratory illness or sepsis. All babies with low saturations had identifiable pathologies. One baby with normal saturations was later diagnosed with transposition of the great arteries. The sensitivity and specificity of identifying an unwell baby was 93.3% and 100% respectively; the sensitivity and specificity of identifying CCHD was 87.5% and 99.8% respectively. Clinical examination alone would have missed 4/7 (57%) of these. CONCLUSION: Pulse-oximetry is safe, acceptable, non-invasive and effective. Our study supports the routine use of pulse oximetry as part of the newborn check.


Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías Congénitas/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Neonatal/métodos , Oximetría , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...