Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
J Healthc Qual ; 39(5): 249-258, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27631706

RESUMEN

Nurse practitioner (NP) co-management involves an NP and physician sharing responsibility for the care of a patient. This study evaluates the impact of NP co-management for clinically complex patients in a home-based primary care program on hospitalizations, 30-day hospital readmissions, and provider satisfaction. We compared preenrollment and postenrollment hospitalization and 30-day readmission rates of home-bound patients active in the Nurse Practitioner Co-Management Program within the Mount Sinai Visiting Doctors Program (MSVD) (n = 87) between January 1, 2012, and July 1, 2013. Data were collected from electronic medical records. An anonymous online survey was administered to all physicians active in the MSVD in July 2013 (n = 13).After enrollment in co-management, patients have lower annual hospitalization rates (1.26 vs. 2.27, p = .005) and fewer patients have 30-day readmissions (5.8% vs. 17.2%, p = .004). Eight of 13 physicians feel "much" or "somewhat" less burned out by their work after implementation of co-management. The high level of provider satisfaction and reductions in annual hospitalization and readmission rates among high-risk home-bound patients associated with NP co-management may yield not only benefits for patients, caregivers, and providers but also cost savings for institutions.


Asunto(s)
Personas Imposibilitadas/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermeras Practicantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , New York , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Geriatr Nurs ; 38(3): 213-218, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27876403

RESUMEN

By providing more frequent provider visits, prompt responses to acute issues, and care coordination, nurse practitioner (NP) co-management has been beneficial for the care of chronically ill older adults. This paper describes the homebound patients with high symptom burden and healthcare utilization who were referred to an NP co-management intervention and outlines key features of the intervention. We compared demographic, clinical, and healthcare utilization data of patients referred for NP co-management within a large home-based primary care (HBPC) program (n = 87) to patients in the HBPC program not referred for co-management (n = 1027). A physician survey found recurrent hospitalizations to be the top reason for co-management referral and a focus group with nurses and social workers noted that co-management patients are typically those with active medical issues more so than psychosocial needs. Co-management patients are younger than non-co-management patients (72.31 vs. 80.30 years old, P < 0.001), with a higher mean Charlson comorbidity score (3.53 vs. 2.47, P = 0.0001). They have higher baseline annual hospitalization rates (2.27 vs. 0.61, P = 0.0005) and total annual home visit rates (13.1 vs. 6.60, P = 0.0001). NP co-management can be utilized in HBPC to provide intensive medical management to high-risk homebound patients.


Asunto(s)
Personas Imposibilitadas/psicología , Enfermeras Practicantes , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Visita Domiciliaria , Humanos , Masculino , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Readmisión del Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Care Manag J ; 16(3): 122-8, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26414814

RESUMEN

The growing population of homebound adults increasingly receives home-based primary care (HBPC) services. These patients are predominantly frail older adults who are homebound because of multiple medical comorbidities, yet they often also have psychiatric diagnoses requiring mental health care. Unfortunately, in-home psychiatric services are rarely available to homebound patients. To address unmet psychiatric need among the homebound patients enrolled in our large academic HBPC program, we piloted a psychiatric in-home consultation service. During our 16-month pilot, 10% of all enrolled HBPC patients were referred for and received psychiatric consultation. Depression and anxiety were among the most common reasons for referral. To better meet patients' medical and psychiatric needs, HBPC programs need to consider strategies to incorporate psychiatric services into their routine care plans.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Personas Imposibilitadas , Servicios de Salud Mental , Anciano , Humanos , Salud Mental , Atención Primaria de Salud , Derivación y Consulta
4.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 63(2): 358-64, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25645568

RESUMEN

Team-based models of care are an important way to meet the complex medical and psychosocial needs of the homebound. As part of a quality improvement project to address individual, program, and system needs, a portion of a large, physician-led academic home-based primary care practice was restructured into a team-based model. With support from an office-based nurse practitioner, a dedicated social worker, and a dedicated administrative assistant, physicians were able to care for a larger number of patients. Hospitalizations, readmissions, and patient satisfaction remained the same while physician panel size increased and physician satisfaction improved. The Team Approach is an innovative way to improve interdisciplinary, team-based care through practice restructuring and serves as an example of how other practices can approach the complex task of caring for the homebound.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/organización & administración , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Administración de la Práctica Médica/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Satisfacción del Paciente
5.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 63(1): 151-7, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25537919

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the oral health status, use of dental care, and dental needs of homebound elderly adults and to determine whether medical diagnoses or demographic factors influenced perceived oral health. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: Participants' homes in New York City. PARTICIPANTS: Homebound elderly adults (N = 125). MEASUREMENTS: A trained dental research team conducted a comprehensive clinical examination in participants' homes and completed a dental use and needs survey and the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index. RESULTS: Participants who reported a high level of unmet oral health needs were more likely to be nonwhite, although this effect was not significant in multivariate analysis. Individual medical diagnoses and the presence of multiple comorbidities were not associated with unmet oral health needs. CONCLUSION: The oral health status of homebound elderly adults was poor regardless of their medical diagnoses. High unmet oral health needs combined with strong desire to receive dental care suggests there is a need to improve access to dental care for this growing population. In addition to improving awareness of geriatricians and primary care providers who care for homebound individuals, the medical community must partner with the dental community to develop home-based programs for older adults.


Asunto(s)
Cuidado Dental para Ancianos/estadística & datos numéricos , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Personas Imposibilitadas , Salud Bucal , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Evaluación Geriátrica , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ciudad de Nueva York , Estados Unidos
6.
J Community Health ; 37(1): 10-4, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21533885

RESUMEN

Seasonal influenza vaccination is recommended for all persons aged ≥50 years to reduce influenza related morbidity and mortality, but vaccination coverage among community-dwelling elderly remains low. Homebound elderly receiving home-based primary care (HBPC) have fewer barriers to vaccination than other community-dwelling elderly. The Mount Sinai Visiting Doctors (MSVD) program provides HBPC to homebound elderly in New York City. This study assessed seasonal influenza vaccination coverage within an urban HBPC program and identified factors associated with vaccine refusal. A cross-sectional analysis of data from the 2008-2009 influenza season was completed and influenza vaccination coverage was assessed. The association between social, demographic and health-related characteristics and vaccine refusal was evaluated using bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression. Of 689 people aged >65 eligible for influenza vaccination, 578 (84%) accepted and 111 (16%) refused vaccination. In multivariable analysis, vaccine refusal was positively associated with female gender (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02, 3.35), black race (AOR = 2.04, 95% CI 1.28, 3.25), and living alone (AOR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.10, 2.67), and negatively associated with dementia (AOR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.37, 0.91). Seasonal influenza vaccine coverage in the MSVD program was high compared to nursing home and community-dwelling elderly. Offering patients vaccination at home without additional expense will likely improve vaccine coverage among urban homebound elderly. Understanding why vaccine refusal rates are higher among females, black patients, and those living alone should guide interventions to increase vaccine acceptance among this population.


Asunto(s)
Personas Imposibilitadas/psicología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Negativa del Paciente al Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Personas Imposibilitadas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Ciudad de Nueva York , Atención Primaria de Salud , Estaciones del Año
7.
J Hosp Med ; 7(2): 73-8, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22173979

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prolonged length of stay (LOS) is a major concern for hospitalized populations at risk for adverse events. Homebound patients are at particular risk for long stays and may have unique discharge needs because of their commitment to be cared for at home despite poor functional status. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to describe factors contributing to long hospitalizations in the homebound population. DESIGN: This retrospective observational pilot study included all 2007 discharges that occurred for patients at The Mount Sinai Hospital enrolled in the Mount Sinai Visiting Doctors Program. MEASURES: Long-stay patients were defined as those having an LOS 2 standard deviations above the mean. Hospitalization days were defined as "nonmedical" when patients medically ready for discharge remained in the hospital. Patients discharged immediately after determination of medical readiness were characterized as "medical stay" cases. The University HealthSystems Consortium Database was used to calculate expected LOS and the LOS ratio. Chart reviews were performed to describe long-stay cases as nonmedical or medical. RESULTS: The average LOS for 479 discharges was 7.84 days, with a mean LOS Ratio of 1.23. Seventeen cases were determined to be long stays. Eight of these cases (47%) were defined as nonmedical stays. These accounted for 136 days of hospitalization and 32% of total long-stay days. The most common reason for a nonmedical stay was nursing facility placement delay. CONCLUSIONS: Nonmedical factors accounted for nearly one-third of all long-stay days in the hospitalized homebound population. Increased interdisciplinary collaboration may help address homebound patient LOS.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Personas Imposibilitadas , Tiempo de Internación , Población Urbana , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Personas Imposibilitadas/rehabilitación , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Listas de Espera
8.
Care Manag J ; 12(4): 159-63, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23214235

RESUMEN

The Mount Sinai Visiting Doctors program, a joint program of Mount Sinai Medical Center's Departments of Medicine and Geriatrics, is a large multidisciplinary teaching, research, and clinical care initiative serving homebound adults in Manhattan since 1995. Caring for more than 1,000 patients annually, the physicians of Visiting Doctors make more than 6,000 urgent and routine visits each year, making it the largest program of its kind in the country. Services include 24-hour physician availability, palliative care, social work case management, collaboration with nursing agencies, and in-home specialty consultation. The program serves many individuals who have previously received inadequate and inconsistent medical care. Patients are referred by social service agencies, localphysicians, and hospitals and are primarily frail older individuals with complex needs. Funded by Mount Sinai and private support, the program serves as a major teaching site for medical nursing, and social work trainees interested in home-based primary care.


Asunto(s)
Personas Imposibilitadas , Visita Domiciliaria , Médicos , Servicios Urbanos de Salud/organización & administración , Anciano , Atención Ambulatoria , Manejo de Caso , Enfermería en Salud Comunitaria , Anciano Frágil , Geriatría , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Ciudad de Nueva York , Cuidados Paliativos , Derivación y Consulta , Servicio Social
9.
Ann Intern Med ; 146(3): 188-92, 2007 Feb 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17283350

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Home-based primary care for homebound seniors is complex, and practice constraints are unique. No quality-of-care standards exist. OBJECTIVE: To identify process quality indicators that are essential to high-quality, home-based primary care. DESIGN: An expert development panel reviewed established and new quality indicators for applicability to home-based primary care. A separate national evaluation panel used a modified Delphi process to rate the validity and importance of the potential quality indicators. PARTICIPANTS: Two national panels whose members varied in practice type, location, and setting. RESULTS: The panels considered 260 quality indicators and endorsed 200 quality indicators that cover 23 geriatric conditions. Twenty-one (10.5%) quality indicators were newly created, 52 (26%) were modified, and 127 (63.5%) were unchanged. The quality indicators have decreased emphasis on interventions and have placed greater emphasis on quality of life. LIMITATIONS: The quality indicator set may not apply to all homebound seniors and might be difficult to implement for a typical home-based primary care program. CONCLUSIONS: The quality indicator set provides a comprehensive home-based primary care quality framework and will allow for future comparative research. Provision of these evidence-based measures could improve patient quality of life and longevity.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/normas , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/normas , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Anciano , Evaluación Geriátrica , Humanos , Estados Unidos
10.
Clin Interv Aging ; 2(4): 545-54, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18225454

RESUMEN

Falls in the elderly are an important independent marker of frailty. Up to half of elderly people over 65 experience a fall every year. They are associated with high morbidity and mortality and are responsible for greater than 20 billion dollars a year in healthcare costs in the United States. This article presents a review and guide for the primary care provider of the predisposing and situational risk factors for falls; comprehensive assessment for screening and tailored intervention; and discussion of single and multicomponent measures for fall prevention and management in the older person living in the community. Interventions for the cognitively impaired and demented elderly will also be addressed.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes por Caídas , Personal de Salud , Instituciones Residenciales , Accidentes por Caídas/prevención & control , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...