Emergency department evaluation of nurse triage questions about safe-at-home and abuse or neglect in traumatic ocular injuries.

OBJECTIVES: Approximately 10 million Americans experience acts of physical violence by an intimate partner (IPV). Ocular injuries can present as a symptom of IPV in the emergency department, but IPV remains underreported in the literature. Understanding the incidence and trends in IPV-associated ocular injuries in the emergency department could increase the detection of at-risk patients otherwise overlooked. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. PARTICIPANTS: Emergency department patients evaluated for traumatic ocular injuries between January 2018 and April 2023 at a large tertiary care health system. METHODS: The study population was identified by ICD-10 code and their responses to being screened at triage for home safety and any nursing concerns for abuse or neglect. Patient screening consisted of a 2-part questionnaire inquiring first about whether the patient feels safe at home ("Yes" or "No") and second regarding nurses' concerns for abuse, neglect, domestic violence, sexual assault, or human trafficking. RESULTS: There were 2,653,993 emergency department visits and 16,737 traumatic ocular injuries in the study period. Of them, 1.1% of patients (154 of 14,457) responded "No" to feeling safe at home. In only 0.6% of patients (82 of 14,457), a nursing concern was documented. Patients responding "No" to feeling safe at home presented with more severe ocular injuries such as maxillary fractures. On regression analysis, married, divorced, and widowed patients as well as patients on private insurance were less likely to report feeling unsafe at home than single patients on public insurance (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Traumatic ocular injuries in emergency departments should raise concerns about IPV. Opportunity exists to improve education, screening, and management of these patients.

Impact of a standardized order set and medication-use process on medication error rates in sexual assault patients presenting to the emergency department for HIV nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of a standardized order set and medication-use process on antiretroviral medication errors in sexual assault (SA) patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) for nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis (nPEP). METHODS: In November 2019, a multidisciplinary group collaborated on an initiative to improve the nPEP medication-use process for SA patients presenting to the EDs within a large integrated health system. Electronic medical records of patients 13 years of age or older who presented for SA examination and were prescribed nPEP during the pre- (February 2018-August 2019) and poststandardization (February 2020-August 2021) periods were included. The primary objective was to compare the proportion of patients experiencing a medication error before and after SA/nPEP process standardization. Data regarding the following medication errors were evaluated: incomplete regimen; inappropriate/duplicative regimen; dosing, frequency, or quantity prescribed error; and initiation of nPEP without an HIV test. RESULTS: Two hundred six patients met criteria for inclusion. A higher proportion of patients experienced medication errors in the prestandardization group relative to the poststandardization group (46.5% vs 11.9%, P < 0.001). Fifty-five errors were observed in the prestandardization group, compared to 16 errors in the poststandardization group. The majority of errors in the prestandardization group were directly related to antiretroviral regimens, while the majority of errors in the poststandardization group involved initiation of nPEP without an HIV test. CONCLUSION: The standardization of the SA/nPEP process was associated with significantly lower medication error rates. Optimization of medication-use technology is an effective strategy in reducing medication errors.

Impact on patients' compliance with medication using prepacked blisters for multidrug medical therapy: I-COMPLY Study.

PURPOSE: Studies have supported the use of packaging interventions such as pillboxes or blister packs to improve medication adherence but have not evaluated the efficacy of these interventions in a population of low socioeconomic status. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of home-delivered pill packs on medication adherence in a low-income Black American population with Medicaid insurance. METHODS: This study was an open-label, randomized, controlled trial. The patient population studied included 80 patients followed by primary care physicians at the Cleveland Clinic. Patients were randomized to a study group who received delivery of their multidrug medical therapy, defined as a minimum of 4 medications daily, in prepackaged blisters or a control group who obtained their prescriptions from their routine pharmacy. RESULTS: The primary analysis compared the mean percentage of missed pills between the 2 groups using t-test analysis. The percentage of missed pills in the study group was significantly lower than in the control group (mean [SD]: 3.7% [6.0%] vs 17.4% [16.6%] missed daily pills; P < 0.001). The number of daily missed doses was also significantly lower in the study group (0.3 [0.5] vs 0.7 [0.6]; P = 0.002). Patients were on a mean of 8.1 (SD, 2.3) and 8.1 (SD, 2.6) medications in the study and control groups, respectively (P = 0.96). CONCLUSION: Delivery of prepackaged medications in a low-income Black American community was demonstrated to improve medication adherence. The use of prepackaged blisters for medication home delivery is a model that can be utilized on a larger scale for patients on multidrug medical therapy.