RESUMEN
In the present study, we test the model of moral incongruence by examining whether moral disapproval of pornography mediates the relationship between organizational religious activity and self-reported CSB and whether the frequency of viewing pornography moderates the relationship between moral disapproval and self-reported CSB in two samples: a general population sample and a sample of members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints ("Mormons"). Analyses revealed that, among both samples, frequency of pornography viewing moderated the indirect effect of organizational religious activity on perceived CSB via morally disapproving of pornography. Specifically, moral disapproval of pornography mediated the relationship between organizational religious activity and compulsive sexual behavior when participants viewed pornography approximately monthly or more (mean and +1 SD among the general population sample, +1 SD among the Latter-day Saint sample). Findings suggest that individuals who attend worship services more frequently are more likely to perceive their pornography viewing as compulsive at higher frequencies of usage - even when their frequency of pornography viewing is unlikely to be associated with actual functional impairment - and that this distress is better understood in relation to experiences of moral incongruence.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno de Conducta Sexual Compulsivo , Literatura Erótica , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Iglesia de Jesucristo de los Santos de los Últimos Días/psicología , Trastorno de Conducta Sexual Compulsivo/psicología , Literatura Erótica/psicología , Principios Morales , Religión y PsicologíaRESUMEN
Like other teens in conservative religious environments, LGBTQ+ teens raised in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (CJCLDS) likely experience unique microaggressions. Furthermore, like other conservatively religious parents of LGBTQ+ teens, active Latter-day Saint (LDS) parents who openly support their LGBTQ+ teens likely both witness microaggressions toward their teens and may personally experience microaggressions. The present study sought to understand parents' and teens' experiences of microaggressions in conservative religious contexts by focusing specifically on the microaggressions experienced by (a) LGBTQ+ teens raised in the CJCLDS and (b) their active LDS parents. Thematic analysis of separate interviews with 19 dyads of LGBTQ+ teens and their active LDS parents (38 total interviews) revealed various ways in which they experienced verbal, nonverbal, and environmental microaggressions. We highlight parents' and teens' shared experiences of microaggressions that may be uniquely related to their religious contexts, such as assumptions that LGBTQ+ teens or their parents are not faithful and exclusionary Church policies. Additionally, we identified microaggressions that specifically targeted parents of LGBTQ+ teens, such as comments suggesting parents should limit their support for their teens. Finally, we found that parents had vicarious experiences with microaggressions through witnessing or learning about microaggressions that targeted their teens. Findings highlight the ways that the religious contexts in which microaggressions occur can influence the way that microaggressions are communicated to and experienced by LGBTQ+ teens - and their parents.
Asunto(s)
Iglesia de Jesucristo de los Santos de los Últimos Días , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Niño , Humanos , Adolescente , Microagresión , PadresRESUMEN
Sexual minority (SM) members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS) face increased exposure to minority stressors as well as concerns of attachment injuries relative to their heterosexual counterparts. The Integrated Attachment and Sexual Minority Stress Model outlines the mutually reinforcing associations between adult attachment and sexual minority stress, positing that adult attachment is both influenced by experiences of minority stress and simultaneously capable of shaping minority stress experiences in adulthood. The present study explored how adult attachment style directly and indirectly affects minority stressors and health outcomes for LDS SMs. A sample of 602 LDS SMs completed a quantitative survey assessing attachment, minority stress, and health. Results indicated that an insecure attachment style related to increased minority stressors and depression, whereas a secure attachment style related to decreased minority stressors and increased life satisfaction. Further, attachment moderated the relationship between minority stressors and health outcomes, such that experiences of minority stress were related to a decrease in life satisfaction only for securely attached LDS SMs. However, securely attached LDS SMs still reported better health than insecurely attached LDS SMs, even when reporting high degrees of minority stressors. These findings add to the growing body of literature suggesting that attachment style has direct and indirect effects on health outcomes for SMs, including those from conservative religious backgrounds.
Asunto(s)
Iglesia de Jesucristo de los Santos de los Últimos Días , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Adulto , Humanos , Heterosexualidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de SaludRESUMEN
In the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (LDS church), beliefs about same-sex sexual attraction are carefully differentiated from beliefs about same-sex sexual behavior and identity, leading some to reject a lesbian, gay, bisexual, or queer (LGBQ) identity label in favor of declining a sexual identity or describing themselves as experiencing same-sex attraction (SSA). Using data from 1,128 sexual minority Mormons recruited from both politically conservative and liberal circles, we examined the relationship between rejecting an LGBQ identity and religiousness, attitudes toward sexuality, and health outcomes. We found that Mormons who reject an LGBQ identity were significantly more religious and less content with their sexuality but had similar health outcomes relative to LGBQ Mormons. We posit that these differences are best understood by differences in group affiliation and support, intersectional experiences with minority stressors, and the lack of generalizability of LGBQ constructs to those who reject an LGBQ identity.