RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Dravet syndrome (DS) is a Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathy (DEE) with onset typically in infancy. Seizures are pharmaco-resistant, and neurodevelopment is compromised in almost all children. There is limited data on the impact of the condition on the family, support needs and hopes and fears in Sweden. METHODS: Interviews were undertaken with the caregivers of 36 of 48 (75%) living children with DS in Sweden focusing on the perceived impact on the family, current supports and hopes and fears for the future. Data from the interviews were analyzed by two raters using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: The analysis revealed seven main themes focusing on the perceived negative impact the disease has on caregivers and family functioning. These negative impacts concerned: caregiver sleep (e.g., frequent night waking), siblings (e.g., gets less attention/time), social life (e.g., limited vacations), family finances (e.g., limited career progression), parental health (both mental and physical) and need for constant supervision (e.g., child's need for constant supervision for fear of seizures). Another theme concerned the impact on family relationships. Whilst some caregivers perceived the impact to be negative (e.g., limited time for each other) others felt that having a child with DS lead to stronger relationships and more 'teamwork'. With respect to supports, the caregivers identified a number of areas where they felt the family could access appropriate supports. Themes regarding supports included: support from the wider family and friends, support from DS support groups (online or in-person), support from the child's hospital or disability service and respite care (e.g., child was looked after on weekends or had paid carers in the home). Regarding hopes and fears for the future, responses focused mainly on fears, including concerns about premature death of the child, transition to adult healthcare services and care arrangements for child when parents are dead. Hopes for the future included better treatment for epilepsy and associated neurodevelopmental problems and finding a cure for DS. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers of children with DS report that the disease can have a very comprehensive negative impact on caregiver and family functioning. Identifying and providing the supports to ameliorate these negative impacts is vital to optimize caregiver and family wellbeing and quality of life.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Dravet syndrome is a rare infantile onset epilepsy syndrome encompassing treatment resistant epilepsy and neurodevelopmental difficulties. There is limited data regarding caregiver experiences of diagnosis, treatment and supports for the associated neurodevelopmental problems. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with caregivers of 36/48 children (75% of total population in Sweden) with Dravet syndrome. Data was analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Regarding the diagnostic experience, themes were: Delays in diagnostic process, genetic testing not optimal, communication of Dravet syndrome diagnosis and support and information soon after diagnosis. Caregivers felt that delays in diagnosis and testing could have been avoided whilst experiences of communication of diagnosis and support after diagnosis varied. In terms of treatment for seizures, the themes were: Satisfied with treatment, emergency treatment, treatment with antiseizure medications, strategies to control seizures via temperature regulation/avoidance of infections and use of equipment and aids. Caregivers were in the main accepting that seizures in Dravet syndrome are very difficult to treat and that seizure freedom is often an unachievable goal. Many felt frustrated that they were expected to take responsibility with respect to choice of medication. They often employed strategies (e.g., avoidance of physical activity) to reduce seizures or their impact. In terms of supports for neurodevelopmental problems, the themes were: Struggled to access support, lack of integrated healthcare and satisfaction with school. Many caregivers felt that accessing necessary supports for their children and developmental and behavioural needs was a struggle and that the provision of support often lacked integration e.g., lack of collaboration between child's disability service and school. Caregivers also expressed a desire that there would be better knowledge of Dravet syndrome in emergency departments and schools, that care would be better integrated and that there would be more supports for assessment and interventions regarding the associated neurodevelopmental problems. CONCLUSION: The responses of caregivers of children with Dravet syndrome highlight the need for supports from diagnosis for both epilepsy and neurodevelopmental problems. Good examples of provision were identified but parents often felt they lacked support and support often came from providers who lacked knowledge of the syndrome. Collaboration between medical, disability and school services was often lacking.
