Randomized controlled trial of self-directed versus in-classroom teaching of narrow-band imaging for diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus-associated neoplasia.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Previous studies have shown that narrow-band imaging (NBI) can be taught to inexperienced gastroenterologists. However, it is unknown whether in-person training is more effective than self-directed training. The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of diagnosing Barrett's esophagus (BE)-associated neoplasia by trainees with no prior NBI experience between in-classroom and self-directed didactic training programs. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial that took place at 2 tertiary-care medical centers, involving 33 participants--12 second-year medical students, 8 first-year gastroenterology fellows, 7 second-year gastroenterology fellows, and 6 third-year gastroenterology fellows. A teaching module was developed for all participants to review. Half of the participants were taught in a classroom setting by an endoscopist with expertise in NBI, whereas the other participants were in a self-directed group that received an automated version of the presentation with audio commentary. Participants completed a test of 40 randomized NBI images, predicting the histology and indicating their confidence levels in the diagnosis. RESULTS: There was no difference in accuracy between the in-classroom and self-directed groups (57.5% vs 57.2%; P = 1.0). The in-classroom group had a significantly higher percentage of high-confidence answers (57.2% vs 41.1%; P ≤ .01), but there was no significant difference in accuracy with these high-confidence answers (60.7% vs 66.4%; P = .34). There was no significant difference in overall accuracy or accuracy with high-confidence predictions between the 2 study sites (57.4% vs 55.9%, P = .58; 63.1% vs 61.4%, P = .69) or between gastroenterology fellows and medical students (57.8% vs 54.6%, P = .27; 62.8% vs 60.8%, P = .62). CONCLUSIONS: The overall accuracy of predicting NBI patterns in BE were modest in our study participants, and there was no difference between self-directed and in-classroom didactic training. Self-directed learning of NBI is adequate for teaching NBI to trainees.

Achalasia symptom response after Heller myotomy segregated by high-resolution manometry subtypes.

BACKGROUND: Achalasia is classified into three HRM subtypes that predict outcomes from diverse management strategies. We assessed if symptomatic response varied when a single management strategy-Heller myotomy (HM)-is employed. METHODS: Treatment-naive subjects with achalasia referred for HM were followed in this observational cohort study. Chicago criteria designated achalasia subtypes (subtype I: no esophageal pressurization; subtype II: panesophageal pressurization in ≥20 % swallows; subtype III: premature contractions in ≥20 % swallows). Symptom questionnaires assessed symptom burden before and after HM on five-point Likert scales (0 = no symptoms, 4 = severe symptoms) and on 10-cm visual analog scales (global symptom severity, GSS); satisfaction with HM was recorded similarly. Data were analyzed to determine predictors of GSS change across subtypes. RESULTS: Sixty achalasia subjects (56.1 ± 2.4 years, 55 % female) fulfilled inclusion criteria, 15 % with subtype I, 58 % with subtype II, and 27 % with subtype III achalasia. Baseline symptoms included dysphagia (solids: 85 %, liquids: 73 %), regurgitation (84 %), and chest pain (35 %); mean GSS was 7.1 ± 0.3. Upon follow-up 2.1 ± 0.2 years after HM, GSS declined to 1.9 ± 0.4 (p < 0.001), with surgical satisfaction score of 8.7 ± 0.3 out of 10; these were similar across achalasia subtypes. On univariate analysis, female gender, Eckardt score, severity of transit symptoms, and maximal IRP predicted linear GSS improvement; female gender (p = 0.003) and dysphagia for liquids (p = 0.043) remained predictive on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: When a uniform surgical approach is utilized, symptomatic outcome and satisfaction with therapy are similar across achalasia subtypes. Female gender and severity of dysphagia for solids may predict better HM outcome.