Validation of the patient reported experiences and outcomes of safety in primary care compact Form Brazil.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the psychometric properties of the cross-culturally adapted version of the Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care (PREOS-PC) Compact Form Brazil. METHODS: A methodological study was conducted with 281 adult Primary Health Care users. Data collection took place online. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to evaluate the psychometric properties of the PREOS-PC after the process of cross-cultural adaptation to the Brazilian context. Internal consistency was evaluated through Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α) and McDonald's omega coefficient (ω). RESULTS: The sample consisted of 73.3% women. The mean age was 36.1 years (SD = 12.2). Of the 23 items of the PREOS-PC that were eligible for CFA, a model with four correlated domains and 16 items presented satisfactory fit indexes. The domains were Practice Activation (PrA) (four items), Patient Activation (PaA) (two items), Experiences of patient safety events (EPaS) (five items) and Outcomes of patient safety (OPaS) (six items). One domain (GPeS) presented one question with a 0 to 10 response scale and two open questions, which cannot be inserted in the CPA due to the nature of the items, but can be included in the application of the scale, being evaluated individually. In this factorial model, five items (EPaS2, EPaS3, EPaS4, EPaS5, EPaS6 and EPaS8) presented factor loadings ≤ 0.30. The α and ω values demonstrated good internal consistency for all domains of the PREOS-PC. CONCLUSIONS: The Brazilian version of the PREOS-PC Compact Form Brazil composed of four domains (PrA, PA, EPaS and OPaS) and 16 items presented evidence of validation of its psychometric properties and can be used to evaluate the experiences and results of patient safety in Primary Health Care in the Brazilian context.

Factors influencing the patient safety climate in intensive care units: cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Measuring the patient safety climate of a health service provides important information about the safety status at a given time. This study aimed to determine the factors influencing the patient safety climate in Intensive Care Units. METHODS: An analytical and cross-sectional study conducted in 2017 and 2018 in two adult Intensive Care Units of a Brazilian Teaching Hospital. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire instrument was applied with the multidisciplinary teams to determine the factors influencing the patient safety climate. Data were double entered into a database and processed using the R (version 3.5.0) statistical software. Position, central tendency and dispersion measures were taken and absolute and relative frequencies, mean and confidence intervals were calculated for the quantitative variables. Linear regression was performed to verify the effect of variables on the SAQ domains. Variables with a p-value of less than 0.25 were selected for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 84 healthcare providers participated in the study. The mean Safety Attitudes Questionnaire score was 59.5, evidencing a negative climate. The following factors influenced the safety climate: time since course completion, professional category, type of employment contract, complementary professional training, and weekly workload. CONCLUSIONS: The factors identified indicate items for planning improvements in communication, teamwork, work processes, and management involvement, aiming to ensure care safety and construct a supportive safety climate.

Evaluation of the patient safety climate in hospitalization units: a cross-sectional study. / Avaliação do clima de segurança do paciente em unidades de internação hospitalar: um estudo transversal.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the perception of nurses from different hospitalization units of a teaching hospital in Goiás about the climate of patient safety. METHOD: An analytical cross-sectional study carried out using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire - Short Form 2006, translated and validated for use in Brazil. All the ethical precepts in research were respected. RESULTS: Fifty (50) nurses participated in the study. The general perception of the climate of patient safety was unfavorable. The worst perception was related to Management Perception, and the best was associated with Job Satisfaction. All hospitalization units also presented an unfavorable general safety climate, but the analysis by domains indicated differences in which the maternal-infant and pediatric units had the highest number of means considered positive (≥ 75), mainly in the domains of Teamwork Climate and Job Satisfaction. There was a moderate correlation between the domain of Teamwork Climate with the domains of Safety Climate, Management Perception, Job Satisfaction and Working Conditions. There was also a moderate correlation between the domains of Safety Climate and Working Conditions. CONCLUSION: The results indicate weaknesses that allow directing the management for improvement actions for the sake of patient safety.

Fatores envolvidos na não realização dos exames de rastreamento para o câncer de mama / Factors involved in the non-performance of breast cancer screening tests

O objetivo foi analisar as evidências disponíveis na literatura sobre os fatores envolvidos na não realização dos exames de rastreamento para o câncer de mama. A coleta de dados foi realizada nas bases de dados LILACS, MEDLINE e Scopus. A estratégia de busca foi: (tw:("breast cancer screening")) AND (tw:("Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice")) AND (tw:(mammography)) OR (tw:(ultrasonography)) OR (tw:("clinical breast exam")). A amostra final constituiu-se de 10 artigos. Os fatores que demonstraram serem associados a não realização dos exames de rastreamento do câncer de mama foram: internos - medos, crenças/cultura, atitudes de vergonha/pudor, conhecimento sobre o câncer de mama e externos - serviços, profissionais de saúde, fatores sociopolíticos, organizacionais. Assim, estes fatores demonstram a necessidade de utilização do serviço de forma organizada e universal, com profissionais preparados a acolher e orientar as mulheres, proporcionando o enfrentamento de fatores que inviabilizam a realização do rastreamento do câncer de mama.

The objective ot this study was to analyze the evidence available in the literature on the factors involved in the non-performance of breast cancer screening tests. Data collection was performed in the LILACS, MEDLINE and Scopus databases. The search strategy was: (tw:("breast cancer screening")) AND (tw:("Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice")) AND (tw:(mammography)) OR (tw:(ultrasonography)) OR (tw:("clinical breast exam")). The final sample consisted of 10 articles. The factors that demonstrated to be associated with the non-performance of breast cancer screening tests were internal: fears, beliefs/culture, attitudes of shame/ embarrassment, knowledge about breast cancer; and external: health services, health professionals, sociopolitical factors, organizational factors. Thus, these factors demonstrate the need to use the service in an organized and universal way, with professionals prepared to welcome and guide women, coping with the factors that impede the performance of breast cancer screenings.