Continuous use of glycomacropeptide in the nutritional management of patients with phenylketonuria: a clinical perspective.

BACKGROUND: In phenylketonuria (PKU), modified casein glycomacropeptide supplements (CGMP-AA) are used as an alternative to the traditional phenylalanine (Phe)-free L-amino acid supplements (L-AA). However, studies focusing on the long-term nutritional status of CGMP-AA are lacking. This retrospective study evaluated the long-term impact of CGMP-AA over a mean of 29 months in 11 patients with a mean age at CGMP-AA onset of 28 years (range 15-43) [8 females; 2 hyperphenylalaninaemia (HPA), 3 mild PKU, 3 classical PKU and 3 late-diagnosed]. Outcome measures included metabolic control, anthropometry, body composition and biochemical parameters. RESULTS: CGMP-AA, providing 66% of protein equivalent intake from protein substitute, was associated with no significant change in blood Phe with CGMP-AA compared with baseline (562 ± 289 µmol/L vs 628 ± 317 µmol/L; p = 0.065). In contrast, blood tyrosine significantly increased on CGMP-AA (52.0 ± 19.2 µmol/L vs 61.4 ± 23.8 µmol/L; p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Biochemical nutritional markers remained unchanged which is an encouraging finding in adults with PKU, many of whom are unable to maintain full adherence with nutritionally fortified protein substitutes. Longitudinal, prospective studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to fully understand the metabolic impact of using CGMP-AA in PKU.

The European Phenylketonuria Guidelines and the challenges on management practices in Portugal.

Background Phenylketonuria (PKU) management practices differ between and within countries. In 2007, the Portuguese Society for Metabolic Disorders (SPDM) approved the Portuguese Consensus (PC) for the nutritional treatment of PKU. The recently published European PKU Guidelines (EPG, 2017) systematically reviewed recent evidence and aimed to harmonise treatment protocols in Europe. The objective of this study was to appraise the EPG acceptance and implementation in Portuguese treatment centres. Methods An electronic questionnaire was prepared and the link was sent to 135 SPDM members. It outlined the 10 EPG key recommendations and compared each statement with the consensus recommendations published by SPDM. Responses were recorded and descriptive analyses were performed. Results Twenty-five professionals completed the questionnaire, and over half (56%) were nutritionists/dieticians. At least one questionnaire from each of the 10 national treatment centres was returned. In general, responders accepted most of the recommendations. However, only the recommendation about target phenylalanine (Phe) concentrations between 120 and 360 µmol/L for patients <12 years received 100% consensus with a further seven recommendations gaining over 70% consensus. Almost half of the professionals (48%, n = 12) required further discussion about the EPG-safe upper target blood Phe concentration (600 µmol/L) suggested for patients aged ≥12 years. Almost one third (32%, n = 8) failed to agree with the recommendation in the EPG-proposed classification of Phe hydroxylase (PAH) deficiency. Conclusions The EPG received overall good acceptance, but there was divided opinion about some recommendations which require further discussion before implementation by the Portuguese treatment centres.