Surgical manipulation of the large intestine increases bacterial translocation in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Several animal studies have suggested that surgical manipulation of the intestine alters the barrier function and promotes bacterial translocation (BT). Whether this occurs in humans has never been investigated. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of surgical manipulation of the intestine on the prevalence of BT in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. METHOD: This was a prospective observational study of 50 consecutive elective surgical patients in whom a sample of mesenteric lymph node (MLN) was harvested after mobilization of the colon, prior to ligation of the vascular pedicle. These results were compared with 472 historical controls, who had a sample of MLN taken before the mobilization of colon during laparotomy. A positive culture of MLN confirmed BT. RESULTS: BT was identified in 39/49 (79.6%) patients in the study group compared with 54/472 (11.4%) patients in the control group. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001, chi(2) test). CONCLUSION: Surgical manipulation of the bowel does increase the prevalence of BT and therefore is associated with changes in gut barrier function in elective surgical patients.

Bacterial translocation studied in 927 patients over 13 years.

BACKGROUND: Bacterial translocation (BT) describes the passage of bacteria from the gastrointestinal tract to normally sterile tissues such as the mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs) and other internal organs. The clinical and pathophysiological significance of BT remains controversial. This report describes results obtained over a 13-year period of study. METHODS: MLNs were obtained from 927 patients undergoing laparotomy. Nasogastric aspirates were obtained from 458 (49.4 per cent) of 927 patients for culture; pH was measured in 172 (37.6 per cent) of 458. Preoperative clinical variables were evaluated and factors that influenced BT were included in a multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: BT was identified in 130 (14.0 per cent) of 927 patients. Postoperative sepsis was more common in patients with BT (42.3 versus 19.9 per cent; P < 0.001). Independent preoperative variables associated with BT were emergency surgery (P = 0.001) and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) (P = 0.015). Gastric colonization was confirmed in 248 (54.1 per cent) of 458 patients, and was associated with both BT (P = 0.015) and postoperative sepsis (P = 0.029). A gastric pH of less than 4 was associated with a significant reduction in gastric colonization (53 versus 80 per cent; P < 0.001) and postoperative sepsis (46 versus 70.3 per cent; P = 0.018) but not BT. CONCLUSION: BT is associated with postoperative sepsis. Emergency surgery and TPN are independently associated with an increased prevalence of BT.

Randomized clinical trial investigating the use of drains and fibrin sealant following surgery for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Despite limited evidence, closed suction drainage is often used to reduce the risk of seroma formation after breast cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of drains and fibrin sealant on the incidence of seroma formation. METHODS: A total of 116 patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer were randomized to receive suction drainage (group 1; n = 58), or to receive no drain (n = 58). Patients allocated to receive no drain were further randomized to have fibrin sealant applied to the dissected area (group 2; n = 29), or to no intervention (group 3; n = 29). Outcome measures were incidence and volume of postoperative seroma, length of hospital stay and postoperative pain scores. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the incidence of seroma between group 1 (15 of 58) and either group with no drains (ten of 29 in group 2; 12 of 29 in group 3). There was a significant reduction in hospital stay and postoperative pain scores in patients who did not have a drain. Following mastectomy without a drain, the use of fibrin sealant was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence and total volume of seroma (190 versus 395 ml; P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Drains did not prevent seroma formation, and were associated with a longer postoperative stay and higher pain scores after surgery for breast cancer. In patients who had mastectomy the use of fibrin sealant reduced the rate of seroma formation.