Obstructive sleep apnea screening in children with asthma.

RATIONALE: Obstructive sleep apnea is highly prevalent in children with asthma, particularly in obese children. The sleep-related breathing disorder screening questionnaire has low screening accuracy for obstructive sleep apnea in children with asthma. Our goal was to identify the questions on the sleep-related breathing disorder survey associated with obstructive sleep apnea in children with asthma. METHODS: Participants completed the survey, underwent polysomnography and their body mass index z-score was measured. Participants with survey scores above 0.33 were considered high risk for obstructive sleep apnea and those with an apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 2 events/h classified as having obstructive sleep apnea. Logistic regression was used to examine the association of each survey question and obstructive sleep apnea. Positive and negative predictive values were calculated to estimate screening accuracy. RESULTS: The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea was 40% in our sample (n = 136). Loud snoring, morning dry mouth, and being overweight were the survey questions associated with obstructive sleep apnea. The composite survey score obtained from all 22 questions had positive and negative predictive values of 51.0% and 65.5%, while the combined model of loud snoring, morning dry mouth, and being overweight had positive and negative predictive values of 60.3% and 77.6%. On the other hand, the body mass index z-score alone had positive and negative predictive values of 76.3% and 72.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The body mass index z-score is useful for obstructive sleep apnea screening in children with asthma and should be applied routinely given its simplicity and concerns that obstructive sleep apnea may contribute to asthma morbidity.

Ambient Air Pollution Exposure and Sleep Quality in COPD.

Rationale: Ambient air pollution exposure is associated with respiratory morbidity among individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), particularly among those with concomitant obesity. Although people with COPD report high incidence of poor sleep quality, no studies have evaluated the association between air pollution exposure, obesity, and sleep disturbances in COPD. Methods: We analyzed data collected from current and former smokers with COPD enrolled in the Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcome Measures in COPD -Air Pollution ancillary study (SPIROMICS AIR). Socio-demographics and anthropometric measurements were collected, and 1-year mean historical ambient particulate matter (PM2.5) and ozone concentrations at participants' residences were estimated by cohort-specific spatiotemporal modeling. Sleep quality was assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and regression models were constructed to determine the association of 1-year PM2.5 (1Yr-PM2.5) and 1-year ozone (1Yr-ozone) with the PSQI score, and whether obesity modified the association. Results: In 1308 participants (age: 65.8±7.8 years, 42% women), results of regression analyses suggest that each 10µg/m3 increase in 1Yr-PM2.5 was associated with a 2.1-point increase in PSQI (P=0.03). Obesity modified the association between 1Yr-PM2.5 and PSQI (P=0.03). In obese and overweight participants, a 10µg/m3 increase in 1Yr-PM2.5 was associated with a higher PSQI (4.0 points, P<0.01, and 3.4 points, P<0.01, respectively); but no association in lean-normal weight participants (P=0.51). There was no association between 1 Yr-ozone and PSQI. Conclusions: Overweight and obese individuals with COPD appear to be susceptible to the effects of ambient PM2.5 on sleep quality. In COPD, weight and ambient PM2.5 may be modifiable risk factors to improve sleep quality.

Sleep disordered breathing in Marfan syndrome: Value of standard screening questionnaires.

BACKGROUND: A high prevalence of sleep disordered breathing (SDB) has been reported in persons with Marfan syndrome (MFS), a single gene disorder of connective tissue resulting in premature death from aortic rupture. The burden of SDB and accompanying hemodynamic stress could warrant broad screening in this population. Our goal was to assess the utility of traditional SDB screening tools in our sample of persons with MFS. METHODS: Participants were recruited during an annual Marfan Foundation meeting and Marfan status confirmed using the Ghent criteria. Screening questionnaires were administered and SDB assessed by home sleep testing. We assessed accuracy of screening tools using receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses. RESULTS: The prevalence of moderate-severe SDB was 32% in our sample of 31 MFS participants. The Stop-Bang questionnaire had the highest positive predictive value (PPV) of 60% and the highest negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% using the high- and moderate-risk cut-offs, respectively, and the Berlin questionnaire had a PPV of 50% and an NPV of 92.3% at the high-risk cut-off. When those with mild SDB were included, the Stop-Bang and the Sleep Apnea Clinical Score (SACS) questionnaires demonstrated useful screening accuracies with PPVs of 94.7% and 92.9%, and NPVs of 63.6% and 47.1%, respectively, at the moderate-risk cut-offs. CONCLUSION: A survey of SDB in a sample of persons with MFS reveals not only a high burden of SDB but also that conventional screening instruments have utility if adapted appropriately. Future studies should validate the utility of these screening tools given concerns that SDB may contribute to progression of aortic pathology in MFS.

Nasal insufflation treatment adherence in obstructive sleep apnea.

BACKGROUND: Nasal insufflation (NI) is a novel treatment method that has been introduced for improving respiration during sleep. NI's warmed and humidified nasal airflow provides ventilatory assistance delivered as a rapidly dispersed pressure head, with minimal side wall pressures, that may affect treatment tolerability. The aim of the current study was to investigate objective and subjective adherence rates for NI therapy in mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: Ten patients (three men and seven women; age, 51.3 ± 9.6 years; BMI, 32.2 ± 7.7 kg/m2 [mean ± sd]) with recently diagnosed mild to moderate OSA (10.9 ± 5.8 events/h) were investigated. A crossover design was used to compare adherence to NI and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy using a range of objective and subjective measurements. Objective (sleep efficiency (%) and arousal indices (arousal/h)) and subjective evaluations of sleep quality were carried out each night in the laboratory. During in-home treatment, adherence for both therapies was assessed objectively (time on therapy) and subjectively (self-reported sleep diary). RESULTS: Objectively derived adherence values were comparable for CPAP and NI, with both treatment devices sharing similar usage per night (3.5 ± 2.5 vs. 3.6 ± 1.6 h/night; respectively) and the number of nights with at least 4 h of treatment (5.5 ± 4.3 vs. 6.8 ± 3.3 nights/trial, respectively). Self-reported adherence was significantly higher than objectively assessed adherence (p < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed similar adherence to NI and CPAP over a short period of usage. A randomized clinical trial is now essential for determining the comparative effectiveness of NI therapy in relation to treatment with CPAP.