A Retrospective Analysis of 83 Patients with Testicular Mass Who Underwent Testis-Sparing Surgery: The Eurasian Uro-oncology Association Multicenter Study.

INTRODUCTION: Herein, we analyzed the histopathological, oncological and functional outcomes of testis-sparing surgery (TSS) in patients with distinct risk for testicular cancer. METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective study on consecutive patients who underwent TSS. Patients were categorized in high- or low-risk testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT) according to the presence/absence of features compatible with testicular dysgenesis syndrome. Histology was categorized per size and risk groups. RESULTS: TSS was performed in 83 patients (86 tumors) of them, 27 in the high-risk group. Fifty-nine patients had a non-tumoral contralateral testis present. Sixty masses and 26 masses were benign and TGCTs, respectively. No statistical differences were observed in mean age (30.9 ± 10.32 years), pathological tumor size (14.67 ± 6.7 mm) between risk groups or between benign and malignant tumors (p = 0.608). When categorized per risk groups, 22 (73.3%) and 4 (7.1%) of the TSS specimens were malignant in the high- and low-risk patient groups, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that the only independent variable significantly related to malignant outcome was previous history of TGCT. During a mean follow-up of 25.5 ± 22.7 months, no patient developed systemic disease. Local recurrence was detected in 5 patients and received radical orchiectomy. Postoperative testosterone levels remained normal in 88% of those patients with normal preoperative level. No erectile dysfunction was reported in patients with benign lesions. CONCLUSION: TSS is a safe and feasible approach with adequate cancer control, and preservation of sexual function is possible in 2/3 of patients harboring malignancy. Incidence of TGCT varies extremely between patients at high and low risk for TGCT requiring a careful consideration and counseling.

A New Safe and Ergonomic Manipulation Tool for the Flank-Free Supine Position: "U-Pad".

Introduction: One of the most important problems in the supine percutaneous approach to the kidney is the narrow surgical surface area (SSA) in the lumbar region. Herein, the spatial and angular geometric advantages of the U-shaped lumbar pad (U-Pad) used as a new positioning tool for safety and ergonomics in the supine percutaneous approach have been revealed. Materials and Methods: Data of patients who underwent endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) using the U-Pad for kidney stones between March and September 2021 were prospectively collected. The demographic, preoperative, operative, and postoperative data of patients have been saved. The patients were positioned first with the standard gel pad (group 1) and then with the U-Pad (group 2). Both SSA (X and X+Y, cm2) and angular degree (α and ß,°) calculations were compared. Fluoroscopy images with the same settings (97 kV/3.00 mA) were visually compared. In geometric data, trapezoidal area formula [(upper base + lower base) × height/2] and goniometer were used to compare with paired t-test. Results: ECIRS was performed on 17 patients, 13 men and 4 women, with a median age of 39 (range 32-47). The median body mass index was 26.2 (23.5-29.1). Stone localization and features were recorded. The median SSA was calculated as 35.7 cm2 in group 1 and 97.3 cm2 in group 2, and it was calculated that the total SSA increased to 272.5% with a median of 61.6 cm2 extra surgical area. Similarly, the downward manipulation angle was 32° (α°) in group 1, whereas it was 60.6° (ß°) in group 2, and the median extra motion angle was calculated as 28.6° (89.3%). Conclusion: The U-Pad is a safe and rapid tool in the supine percutaneous approach to the kidney, providing at least two times the extra SSA and manipulation angle.

The creation of unilateral intermittent and unintermittent renal ischemia-reperfusion models in rats.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: This study aims to establish unilateral intermittent and unintermittent partial nephrectomy-like renal ischemia-reperfusion (I-R) model in rats and to compare the results with biochemical findings. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted on 24 adult 8-week-old male Wistar-Albino rats, each weighing s200-250 g. The rats were divided into three groups. In the Sham group (n = 8), the kidney was surgically exposed and closed. We designed experimental I-R models in the second group (n = 8, a total of 30-min ischemia model in the manner of 3 intermittent sets 8 minutes clamping and 2 min unclamping) and in the third group (n = 8, one session of 30-min unintermittent ischemia). In postoperative day 1, the rats were sacrificed, and the effects of I-R models on the renal tissue were comparatively assessed by evaluating serum Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (NGAL), serum kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), urinary NGAL, urinary KIM-1, and serum creatinine levels. RESULTS: Urinary NGAL and KIM-1 levels were significantly higher in the continuous ischemia group when compared to those in the sham and intermittent ischemia groups (P < 0.05). In the intermittent ischemia group, urinary NGAL and urinary KIM-1 levels were significantly higher than those in the sham group (P < 0.05). Although the results of serum NGAL, serum KIM-1, and serum creatinine levels seemed to be in parallel to the results of urinary markers, no statistically significant difference was found. CONCLUSION: Renal injury was significantly less in the intermittent I-R model when compared to that in the unintermittent I-R model in our experimental rat study.

COVID-19 and urology: A bibliometric analysis of the literature.

AIM: The aims of this research were to analyse the urological literature published during the COVID-19 pandemic and to guide future research. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2019 and 2021, the Web of Science (WoS) All Databases collection was searched for publications related to COVID-19 and Urology. The keywords used during this search were coronavirus-19, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, novel coronavirus, 2019-nCoV, pandemic and/or urology. The top 50 cited (T50) publications were also identified and summarized. Exported Microsoft Excel files, Visualization of Similarities viewer (VOSviewer) software and descriptive assessment were used for bibliometric and statistical analyses of the publications. RESULTS: In total, 582 publications related to COVID-19 and urology were identified. In these publications, the most active author, journal, country and organisation were Francesco Porpiglia, European Urology, the United States of America (USA) and La Paz University Hospital, respectively. The most commonly used keywords were telemedicine-telehealth, SARS-CoV-2, coronavirus, pandemic, residency, testicle, semen, kidney transplantation, endourology and surgery. The most worrying issues in the articles are the negative impact of COVID-19 on resident training and permanent damage to urological organs. CONCLUSIONS: We analysed all the articles related to COVID-19 and urology published to date in the WoS All Databases collection. The most commonly published articles were based on clinical and outpatient practice, telemedicine, residency training, transplantation, and testicles. The long-term adverse effects of the pandemic on urology practice and especially urological organs will need to be assessed further in future research.

External validation of the T.O.HO. score and derivation of the modified T.O.HO. score for predicting stone-free status after flexible ureteroscopy in ureteral and renal stones.

OBJECTIVE: The T.O.HO. scoring system was developed to predict stone-free status after flexible ureterenoscopy (fURS) lithotripsy applied for ureter and renal stones. This study aimed to perform the external validation of the T.O.HO. score in the Turkish population and propose a modification for this system. MATERIAL METHODS: Patients who underwent fURS for kidney and ureteral stones between January 2017 and January 2020 were retrospectively analysed. The patient and stone characteristics and perioperative findings were noted. The T.O.HO. score was externally validated and compared with the STONE score. Stone-free parameters were evaluated with the multivariate analysis. Based on the results of this analysis, the T.O.HO. score was modified and internally validated. RESULTS: A total of 621 patients were included in the study. The stone-free rate was determined as 79.8% (496/621) after fURS. The regression analysis showed that stone area had better predictive power than stone diameter (P = .025). Lower pole (reference), middle pole [odds ratio (OR) = 0.492 P = .016] and middle ureteral (OR = 0.227, P = .024) localisations, stone density (OR = 1.001, P < .001), and stone volume (OR = 1.008, P < .001) were determined as independent predictive markers for stone-free status. Based on the effect size of the stone surface area in the nomogram, stone volume was divided into five categories, at 1-point intervals. The AUC values of the T.O.HO., STONE, and modified T.O.HO. score in predicting stone-free status were calculated as 0.758, 0.634, and 0.821, respectively. The modified T.O.HO. created by adding stone volume was statistically significantly superior to the original version (ROC curve comparison, P < .001). CONCLUSION: The T.O.HO. score effectively predicted stone-free status after fURS. However, modified T.O.HO. SS showed the best predictive performance compared with original T.O.HO. SS.

A nationwide survey on the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on minimal invasive surgery in urology practice.

OBJECTIVE: The beta-coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has changed the clinical approach of 93% of urologists worldwide, and this situation has affected the use of laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic methods, which are known as minimally invasive surgery (MIS). This study aimed to determine the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on MIS in urology practice at national level. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 234 urologists in Turkey participated in an online survey between August 22 and September 23, 2020. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted to determine the participants' demographic characteristics and responses to multiple-choice questions. RESULTS: While 54% of urologists stated that they were concerned about the possibility that the patients planned to undergo MIS were carrying COVID-19 or false-negative for the virus, 51% considered that open surgery was safer than MIS in this regard. The pandemic led to a difference in the preferences of 40% of the urologists in relation to open or MIS methods, and during the pandemic, 39% of the urologists always directed their patients to open surgery. It was determined that during the pandemic, there was a statistical decrease in the intensity and weekly application of MIS methods among all surgical procedures compared to the pre-pandemic (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively). MIS was preferred for oncological operations by 97.3% of the urologists during the pandemic, with the most performed operation being radical nephrectomy (90.7%). Among oncological operations, radical prostatectomy was most frequently postponed. To prevent virus transmission during MIS, 44% of the urologists reported that they always used an additional evacuation system and 52% took additional precautions. There were a total of 27 healthcare workers who took part in MIS and tested positive for COVID-19 after the operation. CONCLUSIONS: Although the number of operations has decreased during the ongoing pandemic, MIS is a method that can be preferred due to its limited contamination and mortality in urology practice provided that safety measures are taken and guideline recommendations are followed.

Relationship between the types of urinary incontinence, handgrip strength, and pelvic floor muscle strength in adult women.

AIM: To investigate the relationship between handgrip strength with types of urinary incontinence (UI) and pelvic floor muscle strength (PFMS) in women. METHODS: Ninety-two women, who presented to the geriatric and urology outpatient clinics complaining of UI between July 2019 and February 2020 and had indicated to undergo urodynamic assessment after basic neurourological evaluation, were included in this cross-sectional study. The presence and types of UI were identified by clinical examination and urodynamic studies. Demographic parameters, anthropometric data, comorbidities and medications were recorded. The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form was applied. Handgrip strength (HGS) was measured by a hand dynamometer. The PFMS was subjectively assessed via vaginal digital palpation and measured quantitatively by the vaginal probe of the perineometer. RESULTS: Thirty-eight urodynamic stress, 28 detrusor overactivity, 26 urodynamic mixed UI patients were reported. Perineometer measurements were significantly lower in the urodynamic stress UI group compared to the other two groups (p = 0.020). There was no relationship between the types of urinary incontinence and HGS. However, a positive correlation was found between PFMS and HGS (p = 0.045, r = 0.298). CONCLUSION: The positive correlation between HGS and PFMS indicates that low HGS may be a marker for PFMS weakness. Furthermore, the association between sarcopenia and UI may be explained by this condition.

Retrograde intrarenal surgery of renal stones: a critical multi-aspect evaluation of the outcomes by the Turkish Academy of Urology Prospective Study Group (ACUP Study).

AIMS: To outline and evaluate the incidence, management and follow-up of the residual fragments (RFs) following retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) of renal stones by the Turkish Academy of Urology Prospective Study Group (ACUP Study). METHODS: Following the ethical committee approval, 15 centers providing data regarding the incidence, management, and follow-up of RFs after RIRS were included and all relevant information was recorded into the same electronic database program ( https://acup.uroturk.org.tr/ ) created by Turkish Urology Academy for Residual Stone Study. RESULTS: A total of 1112 cases underwent RIRS for renal calculi and RFs were observed in 276 cases (24.8%). Of all the parameters evaluated, our results demonstrated no statistically significant relation between preoperative DJ stenting and the presence of RFs (χ2 (1) = 158.418; p = 0.099). RFs were significantly higher in patients treated with UAS (82 patients, 29.3%) during the procedure compared to the cases who did not receive UAS (194 patients, 23.3%) (χ2 (1) = 3.999; p = 0.046). The mean period for a secondary intervention after RIRS was 28.39 (± 12.52) days. Regarding the procedures applied for RF removal, re-RIRS was the most commonly performed approach (56%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the reported safe and successful outcomes, the incidence of RFs is higher, after the RIRS procedure particularly in cases with relatively larger calculi. Such cases need to be followed in a close manner and although a second flexible ureteroscopy is the treatment of choice for fragment removal in the majority of these patients, shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy may also be preferred in selected cases.

Comparison of before and after COVID-19 urology practices of a pandemic hospital.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the effects of COVID-19 on urology practice using pre- and post-pandemic data of a pandemic hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: March 11 is considered as the beginning of COVID-19 and, changes in the number of the outpatient clinic examinations, non-surgical procedures, and surgery in the 8-week period before and during the pandemic were evaluated by weeks. Age, gender, and comorbid diseases of the operated patients were compared statistically. The symptoms, complaints, mortality, and morbidity conditions of the patients were recorded by contacting them. Descriptive data and chi-square test were used. RESULTS: The number of COVID-19 cases has been reported as 8,916 for the hospital, 88,412 for the city and 150,593 for the country. The mean age of the operated patients before and after 11 March was 51 and 47, and comorbidities were 79 and 40, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference(p<0.05). The number of patients examined was 2,309 and 868, the number of operated patients 173 and 94, the number of patients undergoing non-surgical procedures were 371 and 174, respectively. The names and numbers of surgical and non-surgical procedures are listed according to European Association of Urology (EAU) priority classification. In follow-up, no complication because of COVID-19 was observed in any patient. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that, although the numbers have decreased, similar operations can be performed in daily urology practice without any contamination and mortality during the pandemic compared to the prepandemic period, by taking precautions and following the algorithms.

Analysis of patients undergoing urological intervention amid the COVID-19: experience from the pandemic hospital.

PURPOSE: It is reported that surgical procedures performed during the COVID-19 pandemic are accompanied by high complications and risks. In this study, the urological interventions applied with appropriate infrastructure and protocols during the pandemic in the pandemic hospital that is carrying out the COVID-19 struggle are analyzed. METHODS: Urological interventions were reviewed in the 5-week period between March 11 and April 16. The distribution of outpatient and interventional procedures was determined by weeks concurrently along with the COVID-19 patient workload, and data in the country, subgroups were further analyzed. Patients intervened were divided into four groups as Emergency, High, Intermediate, and Low Priority cases according to the EAU recommendations. The COVID-19-related findings were recorded; staff and patient effects were reported. RESULTS: Of the 160 interventions, 65 were minimally invasive or open surgical intervention, 95 were non-surgical outpatient intervention, and the outpatient admission was 777. According to the priority level, 33 cases had emergency and high priority, 32 intermediate and low priority. COVID-19 quarantine and follow-up were performed at least 1 week in 22 (33.8%) operated patients at the last week, 43 (66.2%) patients who were operated in the previous 4 weeks followed up at least 2 weeks. No postoperative complications were encountered in any patient due to COVID-19 during the postoperative period. CONCLUSION: In the COVID-19 pandemic, precautions, isolation, and algorithms are required to avoid disruption in the intervention and follow-up of urology patients; priority urological interventions should not be disrupted in the presence of necessary experience and infrastructure.

Recurrent bladder cystitis: who takes the role?

PURPOSE: In this review, we discuss how the approach should be throughout the symptomatic and diagnostic process of recurrent bladder cystitis. METHODS AND RESULTS: The available literature regarding recurrent bladder cystitis in the PubMed database has been reviewed. While urinary tract infections (UTIs) are amongst the most commonly seen diseases in society, the probability of having a UTI in women within a year is 15%. Within a lifetime, it is above 50%. In addition to the related comorbidities and decreased quality of life, the resulting cost constitutes a serious burden on national economies. Recurrent UTI (rUTI) refers to a group of patients who have suffered from a UTI at least three times in the last 12 months or at least two times during the previous 6 months and have diminished quality of life. During this chronic and bothersome process, it is also complicated as to who is going to make the diagnosis of patients and by whom treatment or follow-up will be provided. CONCLUSION: Although there is no clear answer to this issue in the literature, the urologist might be the moderator of this chronic process as the physician who most frequently faces this condition in daily practice, is most aware of the uroanatomy as well as the pathophysiology and performs relevant operations in cases of necessity. At this point, rather than limiting the evaluation and treatment to a single specialty, it is crucial to solve the problem by using a multidisciplinary approach.

Development of a prospective data registry system for retrograde intrarenal surgery in renal stones: Turkish Academy of Urology Prospective Study Group (ACUP study).

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to report the development of a prospective data registry by generating a retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS)-specific electronic case report form (eCRF), which can be used by multiple centers in Turkey. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Stone Disease Study Group of Turkish Urology Academy developed a template for the necessary data to be collected, which was then implemented within a dedicated server. Urologists from different universities, research and training centers, and private hospitals were invited to participate in this data registry. Each urologist was provided with a unique username and password after they agreed to participate in the study. RESULTS: In March 2015, the development of the eCRF was completed, and the server was opened for data input in April 2015. We started a prospective clinical data registry for all patients undergoing RIRS for renal stone(s) in 15 participating hospitals. Until the end of June 2016, 1112 RIRSs on 1264 patients have been included in the dataset. CONCLUSION: The easy-to-use eCRF specifically developed for RIRS was first of its kind in Turkey. This prospective data registry harvests important data that will be used to identify real-world demographic, clinical and operative data of patients with renal stone who undergo RIRS in various urology departments throughout Turkey. The results of this dataset will be presented in various papers.

Intraoperative Evaluation of Ureteral Access Sheath-Related Injuries Using Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale.

OBJECTIVE: In the present study, intraoperative ureteral injuries inflicted during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) with ureteral access sheath (UAS) use were evaluated using the Post- Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale (PULS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients in whom a UAS was used during RIRS and for whom ureter images were video recorded during the procedure were included in the study. PULS grading was performed after UAS removal, and video sequences of all patients were viewed by a junior resident, a senior resident, and four experienced urologists and assessed according to the PULS. Ureteral lesions in distal, middle, proximal, and multiple locations were evaluated and compared according to the PULS scale. The inter-rater reliability of PULS grading among various urologists was also evaluated. RESULTS: The evaluation comprised 101 patients. In 77 patients, 9.5/11.5 French UAS devices were used, and in 24 patients, 12/14 French UAS devices were used. The stone-free rate, clinical insignificant residual fragments, and final stone-free rate were 41.6%, 53.5%, and 98%, respectively. In 58.4% of the patients, no lesions were present according to PULS grading. No lesions of Grade 3 and above were found; however, there were lesions of Grade 1 and 2 in 38.6% and 2.9% of the patients, respectively. Injuries were found in the proximal ureter only and distal ureter only in 45.23% and 40.47% of the patients, respectively. Multiple injuries occurred in 5.94% of the patients (in 3.96% in the proximal and distal ureter, in 0.99% in the mid- and distal ureter, and in 0,99% in the proximal, mid-, and distal ureter). In the grading performed according to the PULS classification, there was a high accuracy among the residents and specialists. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of UAS-induced injuries using standardized intraoperative methods will help to evaluate the procedure more objectively and will guide the postoperative follow-up of patients.

Is retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy feasible for calyceal diverticular stone?

The aim of this study is to manage the calyceal diverticular (CD) stone, several treatment options were applied but it is still a challenging condition of endourology. In this retrospective study, we aim to report the results of our patients with CD stones treated with retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy (RFNL). A total of 47 patients (55 procedures) who underwent RFNL by a single surgeon for CD stones from January 2004 to March 2013 were evaluated retrospectively. The demographic properties and initial complaints of those patients have been recorded along with their comorbidities and previous history of stone management. Moreover, the size and number of the stones, the duration of the surgery, fluoroscopy time, stone-free rate (SFR) and postoperative complications of the patients have been evaluated. The mean age was 41.8 years (range 16-71). Of the study population, 31 (65.9%) were male. Mean stone size was 21.1 (7-52) mm whereas in 3 (6.4%) of the cases the stones could not be reached. Mean duration of the surgery was 92.8 (57-163) min whereas mean fluoroscopy time was 35.9 (14-103) s. After 3 months of follow-up period, the SFR was 85.1%. No major complications occurred. RFNL with holmium laser and nitinol basket catheter application is a feasible and successful procedure in the management of CD stones. With its high success rates, low incidence of complications and minimal morbidity when compared with other treatment options, RFNL has the potential of becoming the preferred treatment option in the minimally invasive management of patients with CD stones.