A prospective study of angle grinder injuries in the hands and forearms during a one-year period.

Angle grinders are powerful tools used for cutting, shaving and polishing metal, stone, concrete and many hard surfaces in the work and hobby context. The aim of this study was to evaluate the acute hand injuries caused by angle grinders and to identify risk factors. Out of 742 acute hand and forearm injuries presenting in our emergency department between March 2016 and March 2017, 82 cases of injury due to angle grinder were included in the study. The age, gender, occupation, experience and education level of the injured patients were recorded. In addition, the location, mechanism, time of day, cigarette or alcohol use and occupational cases were determined. The Modified Hand Injury Severity Score (MHISS) was used to determine the injury severity. The vast majority of injuries (except 8) were not occupational injuries. They often occurred when individuals were using this tool outside of a work context (home, etc.); 44% of the patients were retired. There were more injuries between the hours of 3 pm and 6 pm. The mean overall MHISS score of was 74 (2-330). These angle grinder injuries, many of which are severe, are difficult to treat and the resulting disability is high. Many factors, such as smoking, age and time of day contribute to these injuries. Precautions should be taken and safety training should be provided for this powerful tool which is widely used and easy to obtain.

Is a High Body Mass Index Still a Risk Factor for Complications of Donor Nephrectomy?

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The incidence of obesity is increasing all around the world and Turkey is no exception. In Turkey, 80.1% of all kidney transplants performed in 2013 were living donor kidney transplants. In this study we compare the early postoperative complications of living kidney donors with a body mass index (BMI) over 30 to those with BMIs under 30. PATIENTS AND METHOD: All donor nephrectomies performed at the Ege University School of Medicine Hospital between May 2013 and May 2014 were included in the study. Donors' demographics, preoperative BMI, operation time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and perioperative blood creatinine levels were analyzed. RESULTS: There were a total of 72 donors, 50 of whom had a BMI below 30 (group 1), whereas 22 had a BMI of 30 or higher (Group 2). The median age was 47 (±12.6) and 52.2 (±8.4) for Groups 1 and 2, respectively. The median BMI was 26.1 (±2.3) for Group 1 and 31.8 (±1.5) for Group 2. There was no significant difference in operation time (P = .980) between the 2 groups. There was no difference in the length of hospitalization with an average hospital stay of 3 days for both groups. No major complications were observed in either group. There was no difference in minor complication rates for both groups. CONCLUSION: High BMI donors can safely donate their kidney with no significant increase in complication rates at high-volume transplantation centers.

Comparison of Patients in Whom Double-J Stent Had Been Placed or Not Placed After Renal Transplantation in a Single Center: A Follow-up Study.

BACKGROUND: Double-J (DJ) stents play an important role in modern urology to prevent undesirable side effects after surgery. We aimed to investigate the relationship of DJ stents with the demographic characteristics, surgical complications, urinary tract infection (UTI), and hematuria in the patients who underwent renal transplantation (Tx). METHODS: Data of 354 patients who underwent renal Tx between 2008 and 2011 at Ege University were evaluated retrospectively; 331 patients were included in this study. The term DJ (-) represents patients in whom a DJ stent was not placed. "Primary DJ term" represents patients in whom the DJ stent was placed during the first Tx. "Secondary DJ term" represents the patients who had DJ after Tx for any complication. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-four (76.7%) patients were in the DJ (-) group, 52 (15.7%) were in the primary DJ group, and 25 (7.6%) were in the secondary DJ group. There were significant differences between the groups in terms of anastomosis type (P = .000), stay-in-hospital time (P = .000), surgical complication (P = .000), re-operation (P = .000), percutaneous nephrostomy (P = .000), UTI (P = .000), first-time UTI (P = .000), recurrent UTI (P = .000), positive hemoculture (P = .000), hematuria (P = .000), duration of dialysis before Tx (P = .000), live/deceased donor (P = .000), and delayed graft function (P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Our choice is to use the DJ stent in selected high-risk patients and to keep the indications for DJ stent wider in deceased donor transplants by considering possible surgical complications. The use of the stent only in selected cases will decrease surgical complications due to stent placement.

Results of surgery-related complications in donors of right lobe liver graft: analysis of 272 cases.

BACKGROUND: Living donor liver transplantation has been a new light of hope for patients with end-stage liver failure on the cadaveric waiting list. However, living donor liver transplantation still has ethical problems which cannot be overcome. Exposure of healthy donor candidates to major surgery which can be fatal is the largest of these ethical problems. In this study, we aimed to determine our rate of complications associated with surgery in donors who underwent right lobe donor hepatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between September 2004 and December 2009, 548 liver donor candidates were examined. The right liver lobe donor hepatectomy was performed on 272 donor candidates who passed the elimination system. Demographic data as well as intraoperative findings, complication rates, and numbers were collected retrospectively. Donor complications were categorized according to the Clavien classification. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-two donors who underwent right lobe donor hepatectomy were included in this study. One hundred sixteen (42.6%) of 272 donors were female, whereas 156 (57.4%) were male. There was no donor mortality. Grade 1 and grade 2 complications were observed in 105 (38%) of 272 donors. The most common complications were fever of unknown origin (20.9%) and prolonged hyperbilirubinemia (3.6%). Grade 3 complications and grade 4 complications were observed in 6 donors (2%) and 3 donors (1%), respectively. Three donors were underwent re-operation due to bleeding. The re-laparatomy rate in our series was detected as 1.10%. One donor, categorized as grade 4B according to the Clavien classification, had small bowel perforation and intra-abdominal sepsis secondary to mechanical bowel obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Donor mortality is a fact of living donor liver transplantation that cannot be ignored like donor morbidity. However, right liver lobe donor hepatectomy can be performed successfully with minimal complication rates with multidisciplinary and rigorous donor care in the preoperative and postoperative period.

Use of kidney donors with hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or brain tumor: a single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: With the rapid increase in the number of patients on the waiting lists, the idea of using organs from donors who were previously classified as "marginal" has emerged. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the patients who received kidneys from donors with hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or brain tumors. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Between 2003 and 2010, 27 transplantations were performed from donors with hepatitis B, hepatitis C or brain tumors between 2003 and 2010. Demographic and clinical characteristics of donors and recipients were retrospectively collected from medical files. RESULTS: Fifteen patients received kidneys from donors with hepatitis B: 9 from deceased donors having a positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and six from living donors with positive HBsAg having negative results of qualitative hepatitis B DNA analysis. Two of the fifteen recipients were previously diagnosed with chronic active mild hepatitis B infection. The remaining 13, who were HBsAg (-)/anti-HBs(+) at the time of transplantation, underwent hepatitis B immune globulin and lamivudine therapy. Median follow up time was 40 ± 35 months. One patient developed decompensated liver disease owing to noncompliance to lamivudine therapy. Five patients who received grafts from anti-HCV(+) deceased donors were anti-HCV(+) at the time of transplantation with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels <40 U/L. All grafts remained functional at a median of 70 months. Seven subjects received grafts from deceased donors with brain tumors, none of whom had a history of a craniotomy or a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. All recipients had serious vascular access problems. No graft loss or de novo malignancies was observed among these patients after a median follow-up of 69 ± 26 months. CONCLUSION: With appropriate patient selection, the donated organ pool can be expanded by addition of donors with hepatitis or brain tumors.

What kind of changes occurred in clinical characteristics of deceased kidney donor recipients after national allocation system in Turkey? A single-center retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical characteristics of recipients of deceased donor renal transplantations were evaluated in the period before versus after implementation of The National Allocation System (NAS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated retrospectively clinical profiles of the 42 after NAS (June 2008-December 2010) versus 42 consecutive deceased donor renal transplantation patients before NAS. Patient and graft survival rates were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method; graft function was assessed based on creatinine clearance with the Cockcroft Gault equation. Patient and donor data were obtained from medical records. RESULTS: Recipients were older in the pre-NAS group (39 ± 8 vs 33 ± 8 years, respectively; P = .001) and median duration of preoperative dialysis was longer in the post-NAS group (103 ± 61 months vs 50 ± 36 months, respectively; P = .000). The average number of human leukocyte antigen-mismatched antigens were pre-NAS 3.4 ± 1.0 versus post-NAS 3.9 ± 1.2 (P = .05). Considering the recipients serological status 9 were hepatitis C virus (HCV)(+) and 2 hepatitis B virus (HBV)(+) among the post-NAS versus no HBV(+) and only 1 HCV(+) patient pre-NAS. Kaplan-Meier analysis of graft survival rates showed 90% at 1 and 85% at 3 years pre-NAS. Similar to 95% at 1 and 86% at 3 years for the post-NAS group (P > .05). Likewise, patient survival rates for both groups at 1 and 3 years were 97%. The mean parameter of donor age, allograft loss, cold ischemia time, patient death, number of retransplantations, HBV(+) patients, and delayed graft function were similar between groups (P > .05). DISCUSSION: After NAS the transplant recipients were older, had a longer duration of dialysis, greater number of HLA mismatched antigens and, more HCV(+). No differences were observed in short-term patient and graft survival rates.

Comparison of isolated and concomitant liver injuries: is hepatic trauma entirely responsible for the outcome?

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to examine both isolated and concomitant liver injuries to clarify the role of liver trauma on outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was a review of all abdominal trauma patients who presented with liver injuries, with or without concomitant injury at Ege University School of Medicine over a 3-year period. Presentation, injury grade, management, and outcomes were analyzed. Patients with isolated hepatic injury (Group A) were compared with patients who had concomitant hepatic injury (liver and spleen/small bowel) (Group B). Significance was set at 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Of 368 patients, 80 (21%) presented with liver injury. Of these, the aetiology was as follows: 53 (66.2%) blunt injury, 19 (23%) penetrating injury, and 8 (10%) gun shot trauma. There were 38 patients in Group A and 42 in Group B. Of these 42 patients, 19 were diagnosed with serious types of injury ; eight thoracic, three open long bone fracture, one intra-cardiac, one intracranial. Six additional patients were observed with injuries to large abdominal vessels. Eleven patients (28.9%) with isolated hepatic injury were managed non-operatively. Mortality, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and transfusion requirements were significantly higher in Group B. Only the number of transfused blood units and the grade of liver injury were found to be effective on outcome whereas stepwise regression analysis revealed that injury type (penetrating) and blood transfusion were predictive for mortality. CONCLUSION: This study highlighted that although isolated liver injury results in good outcome with non-operative management, concomitant injuries to the liver lead to a higher failure and mortality rate. However, liver injury itself is rarely responsible for death.

Simultaneous air transportation of the harvested heart and visceral organs for transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the duration for organ procurement including both heart and visceral organs and outcomes of the simultaneous transportation of the teams back to the recipient hospitals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 2005 and March 2007, 37/82 organ procurement was performed in the district hospitals and transported to our institution for organ transplantation. Combined heart and visceral organ procurement which was simultaneously transported to the recipient hospitals by one air vehicle was reviewed. After both the thoracic and abdominal cavities were entered, all intra-abdominal organs were mobilized allowing exposure of the inferior mesenteric vein and aorta. The supraceliac abdominal aorta was elevated. The attachments of the liver in the hilar region were incised and both kidneys and pancreas prepared for removal. After the inferior mesenteric vein and aorta were cannulated, simultaneous aortic cross-clamping was performed and cold preservation solution infused. Harvested organs were packed with ice and removed to the back table for initial preparation and packaging for air transport. RESULTS: The mean duration of 6 procurement procedures was 63 minutes (range 50-75 minutes) to aortic clamping, and 27.5 minutes (range, 20-40 minutes) between clamping and harvesting. Mean cold ischemia times for 6 hearts, 6 livers, 12 kidneys, 2 pancreas, and 1 small intestine were 2.4 hours (range, 2-3.5 hours), 5 hours (range, 3-8 hours), 10.3 hours (range, 8-15 hours), 6.7 hours, and 9.5 hours, respectively. No graft complication was observed to be associated with the procurement procedure. CONCLUSION: Better collaborations between surgical teams and rapid procurement techniques provide simultaneous air transportation back to the recipient hospital with reduced cold ischemia times of the visceral organs.

Patient with hepatocellular carcinoma on the waiting list for liver transplantation: abdominal seeding due to prior surgery: a case report.

Hepatocellular cancer (HCC) is the most common primary malignant hepatic tumor that accounts for over 80% of primary liver tumors. Hepatic resection is a well-accepted therapy for HCC, but 70% to 100% of patients, depending on patient selection, baseline tumor characteristics, and follow-up duration, develop cancer recurrence after resective surgery. Orthotropic liver transplantation is considered more appropriate in cases with HCC related to cirrhosis. Both procedures may result in recurrence. In some cases, diagnosis of recurrent HCC is difficult because of unexpected localization of the tumor. For these patients, aggressive diagnostic tests might be useful for appropriate therapy. We report a case of a 48-year-old man undergoing resection for HCC, who experienced early recurrence of HCC in the pelvic region.

Is testicular perfusion influenced during laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery?

BACKGROUND: The influence of laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery is still unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the possible early effects of laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair on testicular perfusion. METHODS: In this prospective trial, 44 patients underwent mesh repair of a primary inguinal hernia assigned to one of two procedures: open anterior mesh repair (n = 29) or a laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal approach (n = 15). Doppler ultrasound was used to determine the hemodynamic characteristics of the testicular blood flow. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of Doppler flow parameters for the preoperative, very early (day 1), and early postoperative (day 7) periods. When Doppler flow parameters of the testicular artery were compared in the conventional group, statistically significant differences were found between preoperative and very early postoperative values (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, comparison among flow parameters of the testicular, capsular, and intratesticular arteries of the laparoscopic group showed statistically significant differences between preoperative and very early postoperative and between preoperative and early postoperative values (p < 0.05). There were no statistically differences in postoperative complications between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Testicular blood flow is influenced during laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery. Whether changes in flow parameters remain in the late postoperative period, and whether they have an impact on complications will be evaluated in further studies.

The evaluation of diagnostic accordance between plain radiography and bone scintigraphy for the assessment of sternum and rib fractures in the early period of blunt trauma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accordance between scintigraphy and radiography in the early period following blunt thoracic trauma. DESIGN: Double-blind, prospective clinical study. METHODS: Thirty-four adult patients with blunt thoracic trauma were examined by plain radiography and scintigraphy within 24 hours of trauma. RESULTS: Radiography displayed pathologies in 25 (73.5%), while scintigraphy suggested pathologies in 24 (70.5%) patients. Rib fractures were identified radiographically in 16 (47%) and scintigraphically in 17 (50%) patients. Lateral radiograph of the sternum showed fracture in 10 (52.6%), while scintigraphy suggested fracture in 14 (73.6%) patients with suspected sternal trauma. CONCLUSION: Scintigraphy gave better results in the evaluation of sternal fractures during the early period of thorax trauma. Conventional plain radiography is thought to be the initial imaging modality, because it saves time and shows hemothorax or pneumothorax besides the osseous abnormality.