Diagnostics and Treatment of Extrameningeal Solitary Fibrous Tumors.

Solitary fibrous tumors (SFT) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms that account for less than 2% of all soft tissue masses. In the latest WHO 2020 Classification of Soft Tissue Tumors, extrameningeal SFT was listed as intermediate (rarely metastasizing) or malignant neoplasms. Due to the lack of characteristic clinical features, their diagnosis and treatment remain challenging. The pathogenesis of SFT is often associated with the presence of fusions of the NAB2-STAT6 gene on the 12q13 chromosome. Cytoplasmic CD34 positive staining is considerably characteristic for most SFTs; less frequently, factor XII, vimentin, bcl-2, and CD99 are present. A key factor in the diagnosis is the prevalent nuclear location of STAT6 expression. Radical resection is the mainstay of localized SFTs. In the case of unresectable disease, only radiotherapy or radio-chemotherapy may significantly ensure long-term local control of primary and metastatic lesions. To date, no practical guidelines have been published for the treatment of advanced or metastatic disease. Classical anthracycline-based chemotherapy is applicable. The latest studies suggest that antiangiogenic therapies should be considered after first-line treatment. Other drugs, such as imatinib, figitumumab, axitinib, and eribulin, are also being tested. Definitive radiotherapy appears to be a promising therapeutic modality. Since standards for the treatment of advanced and metastatic diseases are not available, further investigation of novel agents is necessary.

Predictive Biomarkers of Pathological Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas.

BACKGROUND: Marginally resectable and unresectable soft tissue sarcomas (STS) remain a therapy challenge due to the lack of highly active treatment. The aim of the study was to identify a biomarker to predict the pathological response (PR) to preplanned treatment of these STSs. METHODS: In the phase II clinical trial (NCT03651375), locally advanced STS patients received preoperative treatment with a combination of doxorubicin-ifosfamide chemotherapy and 5 × 5 Gy radiotherapy. PR to the treatment was classified using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group recommendations. We have chosen HIF-1α, CD163, CD68, CD34, CD105, and γH2AFX proteins, rendering different biological phenomena, for biomarker study. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were enrolled and in four cases a good PR was reported. The high expression of HIF-1α before surgery showed a negative correlation with PR, which means a poor response to therapy. Furthermore, the samples after surgery had decreased expression of HIF-1α, which confirmed the correlation with PR. However, high expression of γH2AFX positively correlated with PR, which provides better PR. The high number of positive-staining TAMs and the high IMVD did not correlate with PR. CONCLUSIONS: HIF1α and γH2AFX could be potential biomarkers for PR prediction after neoadjuvant treatment in STS.

Inpatient primary prophylaxis of cancer-associated thromboembolism (CAT).

PURPOSE: Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) increases morbidity and mortality in oncology patients. The risk of CAT is increased with hospitalization for acute medical illness. The goal of this review will be to examine the available evidence for (1) risk assessment and (2) primary thromboprophylaxis, (3) international published guideline recommendations, and (4) future directions to manage oncology patients admitted for an acute medical illness. METHODS: A review was performed for each subject to gather information on the available evidence and recommendations available for oncology patients hospitalized for an acute medical illness. RESULTS: Risk assessments for thrombosis are primarily developed and validated in the general population. There is not a risk assessment that has specifically been developed and validated in oncology patients hospitalized for an acute medical illness. Most evidence for thromboprophylaxis of oncology patients is from sub-group analysis of larger randomized-controlled trials in the general population. Evidence is conflicting and suggests an individualized approach evaluating the risk-benefit of thromboprophylaxis. The strength of recommendations of international guidelines is limited because of the available evidence. Guidelines usually recommend utilizing and/or offering thromboprophylaxis to oncology patients hospitalized for an acute medical illness barring contraindications. Future evidence needs to improve risk assessments and knowledge of the appropriate agent, dose, and duration of thromboprophylaxis if indicated. CONCLUSION: Evidence for risk assessments and primary prophylaxis for oncology patients hospitalized for acute medical illness appears limited, with many research opportunities available to improve understanding on management of this patient population.

Treatment of Malignant Adnexal Tumors of the Skin: A 12-Year Perspective.

Malignant adnexal cancers of the skin-extremely rare neoplasms-are mostly reported as non-symptomatic, slow-growing nodules. These carcinomas occur mainly in the middle-aged (50-60 years of age); they are mostly localized on the upper part of the body and are locally aggressive, infiltrate surrounding tissue, and metastasize to regional lymph nodes. The patients' outcomes depend on multiple prognostic factors, including the size of the primary tumor and its mitotic count. Surgical resection of the primary tumor with or without regional lymph nodes is the treatment method of choice; however, due to aggressive tumor behavior, perioperative treatment may be considered. The role and efficacy of radiotherapy in the treatment of skin adnexal malignancies are not yet fully defined. Some authors suggest that adjuvant radiotherapy may be considered in locally advanced and regional disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment outcomes and assess the efficacy of combined therapy in patients with adnexal malignancies. Our analysis covered all cases of cutaneous adnexal tumor patients diagnosed and provided with multidisciplinary treatment with surgery and radiotherapy since the beginning of 2009.

Merkel Cell Carcinoma from Molecular Pathology to Novel Therapies.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an uncommon and highly aggressive skin cancer. It develops mostly within chronically sun-exposed areas of the skin. MCPyV is detected in 60-80% of MCC cases as integrated within the genome and is considered a major risk factor for MCC. Viral negative MCCs have a high mutation burden with a UV damage signature. Aberrations occur in RB1, TP53, and NOTCH genes as well as in the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway. MCC is highly immunogenic, but MCC cells are known to evade the host's immune response. Despite the characteristic immunohistological profile of MCC, the diagnosis is challenging, and it should be confirmed by an experienced pathologist. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is considered the most reliable staging tool to identify subclinical nodal disease. Subclinical node metastases are present in about 30-50% of patients with primary MCC. The basis of MCC treatment is surgical excision. MCC is highly radiosensitive. It becomes chemoresistant within a few months. MCC is prone to recurrence. The outcomes in patients with metastatic disease are poor, with a historical 5-year survival of 13.5%. The median progression-free survival is 3-5 months, and the median overall survival is ten months. Currently, immunotherapy has become a standard of care first-line therapy for advanced MCC.

Efficacy and Safety of Hypofractionated Preoperative Radiotherapy for Primary Locally Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas of Limbs or Trunk Wall.

BACKGROUND: The use of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) shows a significantly decreased incidence of local recurrence (LR) in soft tissue sarcomas (STS). This study aimed to assess the treatment scheme's effect in patients with primary STS treated at one institution. METHODS: In this phase 2 trial, 311 patients aged ≥18 years with primary, locally advanced STS of the extremity or trunk wall were assigned to multimodal therapy conducted at one institution. The preoperative RT scheme consisted of 5 Gy per fraction for a total dose of 25 Gy. Surgery was performed within 2-4 days from the last day of RT. The primary endpoint was LR-free survival (LRFS). Adverse events of the treatment were assessed. RESULTS: We included 311 patients with primary locally advanced STS. The median tumor size was 11 cm. In total, 258 patients (83%) had high-grade tumors. In 260 patients (83.6%), clear surgical margins (R0) were obtained. Ninety-six patients (30.8%) had at least one type of treatment adverse event. LR was observed in 13.8% patients. The 5-year overall survival was 63%. CONCLUSION: In this group, with a significant percentage of patients with extensive, high-grade STS, hypofractionated preoperative RT was associated with good local control and tolerance.

Chondrosarcoma-from Molecular Pathology to Novel Therapies.

Chondrosarcoma (CHS) is the second most common primary malignant bone sarcoma. Overall survival and prognosis of this tumor are various and often extreme, depending on histological grade and tumor subtype. CHS treatment is difficult, and surgery remains still the gold standard due to the resistance of this tumor to other therapeutic options. Considering the role of differentiation of CHS subtypes and the need to develop new treatment strategies, in this review, we introduced a multidisciplinary characterization of CHS from its pathology to therapies. We described the morphology of each subtype with the role of immunohistochemical markers in diagnostics of CHS. We also summarized the most frequently mutated genes and genome regions with altered pathways involved in the pathology of this tumor. Subsequently, we discussed imaging methods and the role of currently used therapies, including surgery and the limitations of chemo and radiotherapy. Finally, in this review, we presented novel targeted therapies, including those at ongoing clinical trials, which can be a potential future target in designing new therapeutics for patients with CHS.

Feasibility and Long-Term Efficacy of PEComa Treatment-20 Years of Experience.

Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) represent a family of rare mesenchymal neoplasms, some of which are malignant. There are no specific management guidelines for PEComas, and factors correlating with the disease course are not well defined. This analysis aimed to describe the outcomes of PEComa patients treated radically, including those treated exclusively in the national reference sarcoma center. The secondary aim of the study was to analyze factors associated with PEComa treatment efficacy. We performed an analysis of 27 patients subsequently treated radically for PEComa between 1999 and 2019 who were in follow-up in the national sarcoma reference center. The proportional-hazards model was used to compare the risk of death. The median age at diagnosis was 45 (21-67) years, and 67% of patients were female. The median follow-up period was 68 months (95% CI: 39-101). At the time of analysis, eleven patients (40.7%) experienced progression of the disease and four (14.8%) died. Surgery in the reference sarcoma center was associated with a longer disease control (log-rank p < 0.001). The 5-year-OS rate was 88% (95% CI: 74-100) for the whole analyzed group. We concluded that PEComa treatment should be managed in reference sarcoma centers by a multidisciplinary tumor board with an experienced surgical team. Microscopically radical resection is associated with a longer disease-free survival. Patients requiring long-term follow-ups as late recurrence may be expected.

Combined Preoperative Hypofractionated Radiotherapy With Doxorubicin-Ifosfamide Chemotherapy in Marginally Resectable Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Results of a Phase 2 Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: There is no standard treatment for marginally resectable soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) of the extremities and trunk wall, and current approaches produce unsatisfactory results. We hypothesized that the combination of doxorubicin-ifosfamide (AI) chemotherapy and 5 × 5 Gy hypofractionated radiotherapy can generate a higher ratio of limb-sparing or conservative surgeries with negative microscopic margins (R0) and acceptable treatment toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a single-arm prospective clinical trial. Treatment combined 1 cycle of AI with subsequent 5 × 5 Gy radiotherapy within 1 week, followed by 2 cycles of AI and surgery. The primary endpoint was to assess the number of patients in whom en bloc R0 resection was achieved. RESULTS: Forty-six patients met the eligibility criteria. Three patients had resectable lung metastases at baseline. Forty-two received the planned protocol treatment. In 2 patients, the treatment was prematurely stopped because of the toxicity of chemotherapy. One patient died of septic shock because of severe bone marrow suppression after the second AI cycle; a second death was not related to treatment for STS. Three patients underwent amputation. In 72% of patients in the intention-to-treat analysis, we achieved en bloc R0 resections. Grade 3+ Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.03 chemotherapy toxicity requiring dose reduction or treatment interruption occurred in 15 patients. Wound complications occurred in 18 patients, but they were severe in only 6 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative AI combined with 5 × 5 Gy radiotherapy is a promising method for the management of marginally resectable STS. This protocol enables a high ratio of R0 limb-sparing or conservative surgeries. Further evaluation of this strategy is warranted.

New Perspectives for Eye-Sparing Treatment Strategies in Primary Uveal Melanoma.

Uveal melanoma is the most common intraocular malignancy and arises from melanocytes in the choroid, ciliary body, or iris. The current eye-sparing treatment options include surgical treatment, plaque brachytherapy, proton beam radiotherapy, stereotactic photon radiotherapy, or photodynamic therapy. However, the efficacy of these methods is still unsatisfactory. This article reviews several possible new treatment options and their potential advantages in treating localized uveal melanoma. These methods may be based on the physical destruction of the cancerous cells by applying ultrasounds. Two examples of such an approach are High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU)-a promising technology of thermal destruction of solid tumors located deep under the skin and sonodynamic therapy (SDT) that induces reactive oxygen species. Another approach may be based on improving the penetration of anti-cancer agents into UM cells. The most promising technologies from this group are based on enhancing drug delivery by applying electric current. One such approach is called transcorneal iontophoresis and has already been shown to increase the local concentration of several different therapeutics. Another technique, electrically enhanced chemotherapy, may promote drug delivery from the intercellular space to cells. Finally, new advanced nanoparticles are developed to combine diagnostic imaging and therapy (i.e., theranostics). However, these methods are mostly at an early stage of development. More advanced and targeted preclinical studies and clinical trials would be needed to introduce some of these techniques to routine clinical practice.

Multimodal Treatment of Advanced Mucosal Melanoma in the Era of Modern Immunotherapy.

Mucosal melanoma is a rare disease epidemiologically and molecularly distinct from cutaneous melanoma developing from melanocytes located in mucosal membranes. Little is known about its therapy. In this paper, we aimed to evaluate the results of immunotherapy and radiotherapy in a group of patients with advanced mucosal melanoma, based on the experience of five high-volume centers in Poland and Italy. There were 82 patients (53 female, 29 male) included in this retrospective study. The median age in this group was 67.5 (IQR: 57.25-75.75). All patients received anti-PD1 or anti-CTLA4 antibodies in the first or second line of treatment. Twenty-three patients received radiotherapy during anti-PD1 treatment. In the first-line treatment, the median progression-free survival (PFS) reached six months in the anti-PD1 group, which was statistically better than 3.1 months in the other modalities group (p = 0.004). The median overall survival (OS) was 16.3 months (CI: 12.1-22.3) in the whole cohort. Patients who received radiotherapy (RT) during the anti-PD1 treatment had a median PFS of 8.9 months (CI: 7.4-NA), whereas patients treated with single-modality anti-PD1 therapy had a median PFS of 4.2 months (CI: 3.0-7.8); this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.047). Anti-PD1 antibodies are an effective treatment option in advanced mucosal melanoma (MM). The addition of RT may have been beneficial in the selected subgroup of mucosal melanoma patients.

Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic Factors of Primary Acral Melanomas in Caucasians.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous melanomas located on the acral part of extremities (hand and foot melanoma; HFM) comprise a rare group within all melanomas in Caucasians. HFM is associated with a poor prognosis. We aimed to evaluate clinicopathological features, long-term outcomes, and prognostic factors in primary HFM in Caucasians. METHODS: Medical records of all consecutive patients treated between 1997 and 2014 were revised. Patients were diagnosed with primary cutaneous melanoma at I-II clinical stage, and sentinel lymph node biopsy was conducted. The analysis was performed to define the clinicopathological factors influencing outcomes in the HFM and subungual cohort. Among 2537 consecutive patients diagnosed with primary cutaneous melanoma, 247 cases of HFM (9.7%) were found, with a median follow-up time of 7.8 years. RESULTS: Median primary tumor Breslow thickness in subungual melanomas and HFMs was 4.0 mm and 3.3 mm, respectively, significantly higher than in the entire population (median 2.2 mm; p < 0.01). In the HFM group, 37.6% of tumors were ulcerated. Metastases to sentinel lymph node (SLN) were found in 28.3% of HFMs. The 10-year overall survival rate in the HFM group and subungual melanomas was 48.1% and 49.3%, respectively, compared to 63.0% in non-HFM melanomas. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that patients with HFMs display worse overall survival compared to the entire melanoma population, with male gender and positive SLN biopsy status acting as independent negative prognostic factors.