Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 146(11): 1345-1352, 2022 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35142822

RESUMEN

CONTEXT.­: The pathologic nodal staging of prostatic adenocarcinoma is binary for regional lymph nodes. Stages pN0 and pN1 indicate the absence or presence of regional nodal metastasis, respectively, whereas patients with metastasis to nonregional lymph nodes are staged as pM1a. OBJECTIVE.­: To determine the risk of recurrence of pN1 prostatic adenocarcinoma patients based on the extent of nodal tumor burden. DESIGN.­: We retrospectively reviewed pN1 patients with prostatic adenocarcinoma managed with radical prostatectomy seen between 2011 and 2019. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to compare disease-free survival. RESULTS.­: Ninety-six patients were included (median [interquartile range] age, 62 years [57-67 years]; 70 of 96 [73%] White). On univariate analysis, age >65 years (P = .008), ≥2 positive regional lymph nodes (P < .001), and a maximum size of the tumor deposit ≥2 mm (P = .004) were significantly associated with an unfavorable outcome. Controlling for age, stage, metastatic deposit size, margin status, and the presence of extranodal extension, patients with ≥2 positive regional lymph nodes were 3.03 times more likely (95% confidence interval, 1.39-6.60; P = .005) to have an unfavorable outcome. Patients with pN1M1a stage showed a disease-free survival similar to that of pN1M0 patients, after controlling for the number of positive regional lymph nodes (P = .36). CONCLUSIONS.­: Overall, pN1 patients with ≥2 positive regional lymph nodes are 3 times more likely to have an unfavorable outcome. The results suggest a benefit in further stratifying patients with metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma to the lymph nodes into prognostically significant risk categories that could help the treating clinicians tailor subsequent patient follow-up and therapy.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Metástasis Linfática/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Medición de Riesgo , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Pronóstico
3.
Oncologist ; 25(3): e528-e535, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32162807

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia and inflammation have been associated with poor survival in patients with cancer. We explored the combined effects of these variables on survival in patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 90 patients enrolled on immunotherapy-based phase I clinical trials at Emory University from 2009 to 2017. Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were used as surrogates of inflammation. The skeletal muscle index (SMI) was derived from the skeletal muscle density calculated from baseline abdominal computed tomography images. Optimal cutoffs for continuous inflammation biomarkers and SMI were determined by bias-adjusted log-rank test. A four-level risk stratification was used to create low-risk (PLR <242 and nonsarcopenic), intermediate-risk (PLR <242 and sarcopenic), high-risk (PLR ≥242 and nonsarcopenic), and very-high-risk (PLR ≥242 and sarcopenic) groups with subsequent association with survival. RESULTS: Most patients (59%) were male, and the most common cancers were melanoma (33%) and gastrointestinal (22%). Very high-risk, high-risk, and intermediate-risk patients had significantly shorter overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 8.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.65-27.01; p < .001; HR, 5.32; CI, 1.96-14.43; p = .001; and HR, 4.01; CI, 1.66-9.68; p = .002, respectively) and progression-free survival (HR, 12.29; CI, 5.15-29.32; p < .001; HR, 3.51; CI, 1.37-9.02; p = .009; and HR, 2.14; CI, 1.12-4.10; p = .022, respectively) compared with low-risk patients. CONCLUSION: Baseline sarcopenia and elevated inflammatory biomarkers may have a combined effect on decreasing survival in immunotherapy-treated patients in phase I trials. These data may be immediately applicable for medical oncologists for the risk stratification of patients beginning immunotherapeutic agents. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Sarcopenia and inflammation have been associated with poor survival in patients with cancer, but it is unclear how to apply this information to patient care. The authors created a risk-stratification system that combined sarcopenia and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as a marker of systemic inflammation. The presence of sarcopenia and systemic inflammation decreased progression-free survival and overall survival in our cohort of 90 patients who received immunotherapy in phase I clinical trials. The data presented in this study may be immediately applicable for medical oncologists as a way to risk-stratify patients who are beginning treatment with immunotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Sarcopenia , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoterapia , Inflamación , Recuento de Linfocitos , Masculino , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA