Musculoskeletal Disorders and Caring Behaviors among Nursing Staff in Greek Hospitals: a Prospective Multicenter Study.

Introduction:Care delivery from nursing staff to patients in hospital environment may involve the exertion of considerable muscular force and, as a result, there is a consequent risk of developing musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the relationship between reported MSDs and perceived caring behaviors among nursing staff. Methods: A total of 250 questionnaires were completed in three Greek hospitals during February and March 2019. The Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire for the evaluation of MSDs and the Caring Behaviors Inventory-24 (CBI-24) for the assessment of caring behaviors were used. Results:A total of 185 participants (74%) were found to have at least one MSD. Back (64.3%), neck (63.2%) and shoulder (58.4%) pain were the most commonly reported MSDs. The mean score on the CBI-24 scale was 5.06 (SD=0.51) and the mean "Connectedness" dimension was 4.59 (SD=0.74). Elbow MSDs were significantly associated with the lowest score in the "Knowledge and skills" dimension (p=0.024) and the lowest overall nursing score (p=0.048). Linear regression analysis showed that the lowest nursing care score was associated with left-handed nurses (p=0.008) of low hierarchical position (p=0.013), suffering from elbow MSDs (p=0.002), for which they did not seek treatment (p=0.023). Participants who continued to work on a regular basis despite MSDs showed a lower score on the dimensions of "Respectful" (p=0.05) and "Connectedness" (p=0.01). Conclusion:The nursing staff showed high percentage of MSDs that negatively affected their perceived dimensions of caring behaviors. These findings could be used to prevent and deal with work-related MSDs, reduce occupational hazards and improve hospital patient care.

Patient Satisfaction and Physician Empathy at a Hellenic Air Force Health Service.

INTRODUCTION: Patient satisfaction and physician empathy are important indicators of health care services quality. The purpose of this study is to investigate the factors related to the health care users' perception about physician empathy and their satisfaction with the services offered by the Medical Department of a Hellenic Air Force Combat Wing Health Service. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty six individuals who randomly visited the Medical Department from January to February 2019 participated in the survey. The "Measuring the satisfaction of visitors to hospital outpatient clinics" questionnaire by Aletras et al. and the Greek version of the "Jefferson Scale of Patient Perceptions of Physician Empathy" questionnaire were used for data collection. RESULTS: High satisfaction scores were found in relation to the medical staff (mean 20.45, max 25), the examination room (mean 18.23, max 25), the nursing staff/secretarial support (mean 16.93, max 25), and the overall satisfaction (mean 17.15, max 25). The satisfaction score related to the infirmary was low (mean score 8.8, max 25). Physician empathy score was extremely high (mean 21.2, max 25). Statistically significant correlations were detected between physician empathy satisfaction score and the medical staff, nursing staff/secretarial support, and the overall satisfaction scores (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Health care users reported high physician empathy and overall satisfaction scores but low infirmary satisfaction scores. The more positively that patients evaluated physician empathy, the more satisfaction that patients had with other measures.

Assessment of Unmet Supportive Care Needs in Haematological Cancer Survivors

Background: Health needs assessment is crucial for the provision of individualized nursing care. However, many patients report a significant number of unmet needs. The aim of the present study was the assessment of self-reported unmet supportive care needs among haematological cancer survivors in Greece. Methods: 102 patients (mean age 66.2 years old) diagnosed with haematological cancer were included in a cross-sectional study, conducted in two major Greek public hospitals, between October and December 2016. Patients' needs were assessed using the 'Needs Evaluation Questionnaire' (NEQ). Data analysis was conducted using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences software for Windows. Alfa-level (p-value) selected was 5%, bootstrap techniques were used for 95% CI estimation, χ2 was used for differentiation control and Kuder-Richardson coefficient for reliability score assessment (ρ = 0.922). Results: Patients reported higher needs levels "to receive less commiseration from other people" (48%), "more information about my future condition" (44.1%) and "to feel more useful within my family" (42.2%). In contrast, patients reported lower levels to the needs "to speak with a spiritual advisor" (11.8%), "to have more help with eating, dressing and going to the bathroom" (13.7%) and "better attention from nurses" (18.6%). The mean score of satisfied patients (≥8/10) was 8.9 (SD 1.7). Associations between socio-demographic, hospitalization data and unmet needs groups were identified. The less satisfied patients (<8/10) reported more informational needs about their diagnosis and their future condition (p-value=0.002), about their exams and treatments (p-value=0.001), communicative (p-value <0.001), assistance and treatment (p-value<0.001) and hospital infrastructure (p-value <0.001). Conclusion: Various factors seem to be associated to the prevalent unmet care needs among haematological cancer patients. Establishing NEQ as a routine needs assessment tool could aid health professionals to early identify patients' needs in a busy clinical setting and implement more individualized and patient-centered quality care.

Economic evaluation of treatment strategies for patients suffering acute myocardial infarction in Greece.

INTRODUCTION: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the leading causes of death in Greece and elsewhere. The objective of this paper was to conduct an economic evaluation of three alternative treatment options, alteplase, reteplase, and tenecteplase, in different groups of patients. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify studies evaluating the three treatments considered. Data from selected trials were extracted and applied to a decision analytic model, which has a time horizon extending to the end of a patient's life. The health outcomes included in the analysis contain all major health events that may occur after an AMI. Total treatment cost comprises the cost of initial treatment, the cost associated with hospitalisations due to AMI and events such as stroke, reinfarction, etc., and the lifetime costs of patients surviving. The model allows for different patient sub-groups. Simulation was used to test the robustness of the findings. RESULTS: For the baseline group, there was no major difference between the three treatments, in terms of treatment cost and survival. Specifically, lifetime cost per patient was around Euro 18,950 (range Euro 18,947 - Euro 18,990) and overall survival was around 8.4 years (range 8.359 - 8.472). Nonetheless, for patients above the age of 75 and for patients starting treatment 4 hours after symptom onset, tenecteplase was more cost-effective compared to the other two treatments. Its incremental cost effectiveness ratio was Euro 2,205 in the former group and Euro 868 in the latter and these results reached high levels of significance. CONCLUSION: Despite its higher price, in the setting of the Greek National Health Service tenecteplase is a cost-effective treatment for AMI patients, comparable to alteplase and reteplase, and it should also be included in the positive drug list along with the other two drugs. Simple price comparison of alternative treatments is not the best option for supporting decisions on pricing and reimbursement of new therapies.