Blunt splenic injury in children: haemodynamic status key to guiding management, a 5-year review of practice in a UK major trauma centre.

PURPOSE: To review the management of children and adolescents (0-18 years), with blunt splenic injury treated at a single UK major trauma centre over a 5-year period, focusing upon efficacy of non-operative management and the use of haemodynamic stability as a guide to planning treatment strategy, rather than radiological injury grading. To produce a treatment pathway for management of blunt splenic injury in children. METHODS: Retrospective, cross-sectional study of all paediatric patients admitted with radiologically proven blunt splenic injury between January 2011 and March 2016. Penetrating injuries were excluded. Follow up was for at least 30 days. RESULTS: 30 Patients were included, mean age was 14.5 (SD 3.6), median injury severity score was 16 (IQR 10-31). 6 Patients (20%) had a splenectomy, whilst 22 patients (73%) were successfully treated non-operatively with 100% efficacy at index admission. 5/8 (63%) patients with radiological grade V injuries were managed non-operatively, injury grade was not associated with surgical intervention (p = 1.57). Haemodynamic instability was initially treated with fluid resuscitation leading to successful non-operative management in 5/11 (45%) patients. However, haemodynamic instability is a significant predictor of requirement for surgical intervention (p = 0.03), admission to critical care (p = 0.017), presence of additional injuries (p = 0.015) and increased length of stay (p = 0.038). No such relationships were found to be associated with increased radiological injury grade. CONCLUSIONS: Non-operative management should be first-line treatment in the haemodynamically stable child with a blunt splenic injury and may be carried out with a high degree of efficacy. It may also be successfully implemented in those initially showing signs of haemodynamic instability that respond to fluid resuscitation. Radiological injury grade does not predict definitive management, level of care, or length of stay; however, haemodynamic stability may be utilised to produce a treatment algorithm and is key to guiding management.

A study of outcomes of patients treated at a UK major trauma centre for moderate or severe injuries one to three years after injury.

OBJECTIVE: To assess return to work outcomes of major trauma patients treated at a level 1 UK major trauma centre and evaluate factors associated with improved outcomes. DESIGN: Cross-sectional cohort design. SUBJECTS: In total, 99 patients at one, two or three years post-discharge from a Major Trauma Centre with an injury severity score above 9, in full-time work or education prior to injury, aged 18-70 and discharged between April 2012 and June 2015. MAIN MEASURES: Self-report questionnaire including the Trauma Outcome Profile, the Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Screening questionnaire and questions pertaining to work and education. RESULTS: Of the 99 patients in full-time work pre-injury, 65 made a complete return to work, 15 made an incomplete return to work and 19 did not return to work, where incomplete return to work was defined as working below 80% of previous working hours. In all, 25 participants scored below the cut-off point on physical disabilities, 46 below the cut-off point on mental functioning and 38 below the cut-off point on social interaction. Reduced anxiety and higher mental functioning were consistently associated with complete return to work. CONCLUSION: In all, 66% of patients with moderate to severe injuries made a complete return to work. A range of psycho-social, physical and functional health issues were persistent at long-term follow-up.

Management of blunt splenic injury in a UK major trauma centre and predicting the failure of non-operative management: a retrospective, cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: To review the management of patients >16 years with blunt splenic injury in a single, UK, major trauma centre and identify whether the following are associated with success or failure of non-operative management with selective use of arterial embolization (NOM ± AE): age, Injury Severity Score (ISS), head injury, haemodynamic instability, massive transfusion, radiological hard signs [contrast extravasation or pseudoaneurysm on the initial computed tomography (CT) scan], grade, and presence of intraparenchymal haematoma or splenic laceration. METHODS: Retrospective, cross-sectional study undertaken between April 2012 and October 2015. Paediatric patients, penetrating splenic trauma, and iatrogenic injuries were excluded. Follow-up was for at least 30 days. RESULTS: 154 patients were included. Median age was 38 years, 77.3% were male, and median ISS was 22. 14/87 (16.1%) patients re-bled following NOM in a median of 2.3 days (IQR 0.8-3.6 days). 8/28 (28.6%) patients re-bled following AE in a median of 2.0 days (IQR 1.3-3.7 days). Grade III-V injuries are a significant predictor of the failure of NOM ± AE (OR 15.6, 95% CI 3.1-78.9, p = 0.001). No grade I injuries and only 3.3% grade II injuries re-bled following NOM ± AE. Age ≥55 years, ISS, radiological hard signs, and haemodynamic instability are not significant predictors of the failure of NOM ± AE, but an intraparenchymal or subcapsular haematoma increases the likelihood of failure 11-fold (OR 10.9, 95% CI 2.2-55.1, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Higher grade injuries (III-V) and intraparenchymal or subcapsular haematomas are associated with a higher failure rate of NOM ± AE and should be managed more aggressively. Grade I and II injuries can be discharged after 24 h with appropriate advice.