An Innovative Surgical Technique: Dorsal SMAS Periosteal Flap for Nasal Radix Augmentation.

The nasal radix holds significant importance in facial aesthetics, sometimes requiring augmentation to create balanced facial profiles. A flat nasal radix can cause inadequate projection and the appearance of a pseudo-hump. In these cases, rhinoplasty surgeons should avoid working on the pseudo-hump and focus on elevating the radix to achieve the desired aesthetic outcome. Here, we introduce a novel approach and "how we do" the dorsal superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) periosteal flap for nasal radix augmentation. Using an external septorhinoplasty approach, the initial dissection is performed over the nasal bones in the supra-SMAS plane. Then, an SMAS flap is designed with two lateral and one caudal incision extending to the osseocartilaginous junction and dissected subperiosteally. Next, the flap is rotated to fill the space between the nasal bones and skin, augmenting the nasal radix. Compared to traditional methods, this approach always utilizes the patient's own tissue, minimizes rejection, and ensures seamless integration, providing lasting results. It ensures structural stability and avoids the use of cartilage, eliminating the risk of resorption. The dorsal SMAS periosteal flap presents a tailored, durable solution that consistently yields excellent outcomes while overcoming the risk of instability associated with cartilage grafts.

Management of paediatric sleep-disordered breathing.

Paediatric sleep-disordered breathing is a common condition which varies in severity from snoring to obstructive sleep apnoea. Paediatric sleep-disordered breathing is usually diagnosed clinically, with investigations such as polysomnography reserved for more complex cases. Management can involve watching and waiting, medical or adjunct treatments and adenotonsillectomy. National working groups have sought to standardise the pathway for surgery and improve the management of surgical and anaesthetic complications. Current guidelines use age, weight and comorbidities to stratify risk for these surgical cases. This article summarises these recommendations and outlines the important factors that indicate cases that may be more suitable for management in secondary and tertiary units. Appropriate case selection will reduce pressure on tertiary units while maintaining training opportunities in district general hospitals.

Tonsillectomy versus tonsillotomy for obstructive sleep-disordered breathing in children.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep-disordered breathing (oSDB) is a condition encompassing breathing problems when asleep due to upper airway obstruction. In children, hypertrophy of the tonsils and/or adenoids is thought to be the commonest cause. As such, (adeno)tonsillectomy has long been the treatment of choice. A rise in partial removal of the tonsils over the last decade is due to the hypothesis that tonsillotomy is associated with lower postoperative morbidity and fewer complications. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether partial removal of the tonsils (intracapsular tonsillotomy) is as effective as total removal of the tonsils (extracapsular tonsillectomy) in relieving signs and symptoms of oSDB in children, and has lower postoperative morbidity and fewer complications. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane ENT Trials Register; Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE; EMBASE; CINAHL; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The search date was 22 July 2019. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness of (adeno)tonsillectomy with (adeno)tonsillotomy in children aged 2 to 16 years with oSDB. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods and assessed the certainty of the evidence for our pre-defined outcomes using GRADE. Our primary outcomes were disease-specific quality of life, peri-operative blood loss and the proportion of children requiring postoperative medical intervention (with or without hospitalisation). Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, return to normal activity, recurrence of oSDB symptoms as a result of tonsil regrowth and reoperation rates. MAIN RESULTS: We included 22 studies (1984 children), with predominantly unclear or high risk of bias. Three studies used polysomnography as part of their inclusion criteria. Follow-up duration ranged from six days to six years. Although 19 studies reported on some of our outcomes, we could only pool the results from a few due both to the variety of outcomes and the measurement instruments used, and an absence of combinable data. Disease-specific quality of life Four studies (540 children; 484 (90%) analysed) reported this outcome; data could not be pooled due to the different outcome measurement instruments used. It is very uncertain whether there is any difference in disease-specific quality of life between the two surgical procedures in the short (0 to 6 months; 3 studies, 410 children), medium (7 to 13 months; 2 studies, 117 children) and long term (13 to 24 months; 1 study, 67 children) (very low-certainty evidence). Peri-operative blood loss We are uncertain whether tonsillotomy reduces peri-operative blood loss by a clinically meaningful amount (mean difference (MD) 14.06 mL, 95% CI 1.91 to 26.21 mL; 8 studies, 610 children; very low-certainty evidence). In sensitivity analysis (restricted to three studies with low risk of bias) there was no evidence of a difference between the groups. Postoperative complications requiring medical intervention (with or without hospitalisation) The risk of postoperative complications in the first week after surgery was probably lower in children who underwent tonsillotomy (4.9% versus 2.6%, risk ratio (RR) 1.75, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.91; 16 studies, 1416 children; moderate-certainty evidence). Postoperative pain Eleven studies (1017 children) reported this outcome. Pain was measured using various scales and scored by either children, parents, clinicians or study personnel. When considering postoperative pain there was little or no difference between tonsillectomy and tonsillotomy at 24 hours (10-point scale) (MD 1.09, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.29; 4 studies, 368 children); at two to three days (MD 0.93, 95% CI -0.14 to 2.00; 3 studies, 301 children); or at four to seven days (MD 1.07, 95% CI -0.40 to 2.53; 4 studies, 370 children) (all very low-certainty evidence). In sensitivity analysis (restricted to studies with low risk of bias), we found no evidence of a difference in mean pain scores between groups. Return to normal activity Tonsillotomy probably results in a faster return to normal activity. Children who underwent tonsillotomy were able to return to normal activity four days earlier (MD 3.84 days, 95% CI 0.23 to 7.44; 3 studies, 248 children; moderate-certainty evidence). Recurrence of oSDB and reoperation rates We are uncertain whether there is a difference between the groups in the short (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.22; 3 studies, 186 children), medium (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.23; 4 studies, 206 children) or long term (RR 0.21 95% CI 0.01 to 4.13; 1 study, 65 children) (all very low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: For children with oSDB selected for tonsil surgery, tonsillotomy probably results in a faster return to normal activity (four days) and in a slight reduction in postoperative complications requiring medical intervention in the first week after surgery. This should be balanced against the clinical effectiveness of one operation over the other. However, this is not possible to determine in this review as data on the long-term effects of the two operations on oSDB symptoms, quality of life, oSDB recurrence and need for reoperation are limited and the evidence is of very low quality leading to a high degree of uncertainty about the results. More robust data from high-quality cohort studies, which may be more appropriate for detecting differences in less common events in the long term, are required to inform guidance on which tonsil surgery technique is best for children with oSDB requiring surgery.

Esophageal atresia and transitional care--step 1: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to define the prevalence of chronic long-term problems.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal atresia (EA) is a rare congenital anomaly with high infantile survival rates. The aim of this study was to outline the prevalence of common long-term problems associated with EA repair in patients older than 10 years of age. DATA SOURCES: Original papers were identified by systematic searching of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from January 1993 to July 2014. Fifteen articles (907 EA patients) met inclusion criteria. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic review aiming to quantify the prevalence of the long-term problems associated with EA. The main active medical conditions (pooled estimated prevalence) identified were the following: dysphagia (50.3%), gastroesophageal reflux disease with (40.2%) or without (56.5%) histological esophagitis, recurrent respiratory tract infections (24.1%), doctor-diagnosed asthma (22.3%), persistent cough (14.6%), and wheeze (34.7%). The prevalence of Barrett's esophagus (6.4%) was 4 and 26 times higher than the adult (1.6%) and pediatric (.25%) general populations. Adult and pediatric practitioners should focus on how to develop effective long-term follow-up and transitional care for these patients.