RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Both surgery and conservative management are well established treatments for compression fractures of the thoraco-lumbar spine without neurological compromise. This article aims to compare the outcomes of conservative management to those of vertebroplasty, a relatively safe and simple procedure. METHODS: 102 patients were admitted to our neurosurgical unit between January 2012 and February 2016, presenting with a single-level, post-traumatic A1 or A2 Mager l type fracture, affecting the thoracic-lumbar spine without any neurological deficits. After description of both treatment options, the patients were asked to choose between vertebroplasty or conservative treatment. Accordingly, the patients were allocated into two groups and a prospective non-randomized controlled trial was carried out. The first group (Group A) included 52 patients, treated with bed rest and an orthosis. The second group (Group B) of 50 patients underwent a percutaneous vertebroplasty. Pain intensity (assessed via visual analog scale (VAS)), disability degree (assessed via Oswestry Disability Index), ability to resume work (assessed via Denis work Scale), vertebral body height loss rate, regional kyphosis angle (Cobb's angle), duration of hospitalization and treatment-associated complications, were prospectively recorded in a database and analyzed. Follow ups were planned at 1, 6, and 12 months after the injury. RESULTS: Group B, compared with group A, showed a faster improvement in VAS score as well as functional ability and return to work. Cobb's angle progression was significantly less in the surgical group. Morbidity, mortality, and complication rate were similar and comparable in both groups without a statistical difference (P<0.05) CONCLUSIONS: Vertebroplasty is a safe and effective treatment in post-traumatic thoracic-lumbar fractures compared with conservative management.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas por Compresión , Fracturas Osteoporóticas , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Vertebroplastia , Tratamiento Conservador , Fracturas por Compresión/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas por Compresión/cirugía , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/lesiones , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Primary dural lymphoma (PDL) is an extremely rare subtype of primary central nervous system lymphoma arising from the dura mater in absence of systemic disease. The most common histological type is the low-grade marginal zone lymphoma, whereas high-grade lymphomas are unusual. We present a case of primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, presenting as PDL in the posterior fossa, originating from the dura mater of the petrous bone covering the surface of the left cerebellum, a location not previously described. A 65-year-old woman presented with sudden onset of severe dizziness was admitted in otolaryngology department then transferred to neurosurgery ward. CT scan revealed a large lesion involving left cerebellum, subsequent MRI of the brain demonstrated an enhancing mass suggestive for petrous bone meningioma. The tumor was excised, and the histopathological examination unexpectedly revealed a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The patient received postoperative chemoradiotherapy. 20 months after surgery a good outcome was registered. Due to the rarity of primary dural lymphomas no standard treatment is available, however, gross total or subtotal resection followed by adjuvant therapy seems to be a good choice to manage the pathology.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Cerebelosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Duramadre/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Meníngeas/diagnóstico por imagen , Meningioma/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Neoplasias Cerebelosas/cirugía , Duramadre/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Meníngeas/cirugía , Meningioma/cirugíaRESUMEN
In the modern era evidence-based medicine, guidelines and recommendations represent a key-point of daily activity. The Spinal Section of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery introduced some recommendations regarding Degenerative Lumbar Spine Stenosis based on those of the Spine Committee of World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies, revising them on the basis of Italian common practice. In June 2019, a Committee of 21 spine surgeons met in Rome to validate the recommendations of the WFNS. Furthermore, they decided to review the ones that did not reach a consensus to create Italian Recommendations on Degenerative Lumbar Spine Stenosis. A literature review of the last ten years was performed and the statements were voted using the Delphi method. Forty-one statements were discussed, and 7 statements were voted again to reach a consensus with respect to those of the WFNS. A total of 40 statements reached a consensus, of which 36 reached a positive consensus and 4 a negative consensus, while no consensus was reached in 1 case. Conservative multimodal therapy, tailored on the patient, is a reasonable and effective first option choice for the treatment of LSS patients with tolerable moderate symptoms. Surgical treatment is reserved for symptomatic patients non-responding to conservative treatment or with neurological deficits. The best surgical technique to use depends on personal experience; modern MISS techniques are equivalent to open decompressive surgery with some advantages and higher cost-effectiveness. Fusion surgery and mobility preserving surgery only have a marginal role in the treatment of DLSS without instability.
Asunto(s)
Neurocirugia , Fusión Vertebral , Estenosis Espinal , Constricción Patológica , Humanos , Italia , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Estenosis Espinal/cirugíaAsunto(s)
Hematoma Subdural Crónico/cirugía , Trepanación/métodos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Spasticity is associated with various neurological conditions. In this study the authors analyzed the long term effects of intrathecal baclofen therapy in multiple sclerosis and evalued the benefits of the treatment on spasticity, disability, pain, spasm frequency and rated the incidence of side effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A records of 123 patients, with a severe, progressive and refractory to medical therapy spasticity from different causes, underwent baclofen pump placement, after a bolus test, from 2000 to 2012,under Department of Neurosurgery at the Second University of Naples/Italy. We present our experience in treating 28 subjects that was affected by multiple sclerosis. For all patients we reviewed long-term response to therapy, surgical technique, surgery- and pump-related complications. Every patients were evaluated by means of the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Penn Spasm Frequency Scale (SFS), Visual analogue Scale For Pain (VAS), Barthel index (BI) and Self Rating Depression Scale (SDS) RESULTS: During follow up the mean MAS score for upper and lower extremities decrease significantly. Also SFS's decrease was statistically significant. This resulted in a dramatic improvement of BI. Furthermore, we observed a marked improvement in VAS and SDS. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal baclofen provides effective long-term treatment of spasticity multiple sclerosis related. ITB therapy increases the quality of lifestyle and functional independence in appropriately selected cases.