Multimodal Pain Control Utilizing Buprenorphine for Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: A Quality Improvement Comparison to Conventional Opioid Management.

INTRODUCTION: This study investigated the effectiveness of buprenorphine as an alternative to the use of conventional opioids perioperatively in an effort to help mitigate the impact of the use of perioperative conventional opioids for patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. METHODS: Outcomes of patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy were examined before and after implementation of novel quality improvement study that included receiving buprenorphine compared to conventional opioids for pain control intraoperatively and postoperatively. The primary end point was adequate pain control with secondary end points being analgesic consumption at home, opioid-related side effects, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: When analyzing the secondary end point of oral morphine milligram equivalents, the buprenorphine group received significantly less morphine milligram equivalent compared to the conventional opioid group (15.19 vs 47.91, P = .006). The buprenorphine group also had lower reported pain scores at discharge (4.3; scale 1-10) compared to the conventional opioid group (5.4), though this did not reach significance (P = .069). In the buprenorphine group, 76.9% strongly agreed that their pain was adequately controlled in the hospital compared to 57.5% of the conventional opioid group (P = .223). There was no difference in overall satisfaction at postoperative day 5 (P = .358). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates buprenorphine's analgesic capabilities to maintain adequate pain control and patient satisfaction compared to conventional opioids during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, while decreasing perioperative opioid use.

Quelling the Storm: A Review of the Management of Electrical Storm.

Heightened sympathetic input to the myocardium potentiates cardiac electrical instability and may herald an electrical storm. An electrical storm is characterized by 3 or more episodes of ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, or appropriate internal cardiac defibrillator shocks within 24 hours. Management of electrical storms is resource-intensive and inevitably requires careful coordination between multiple subspecialties. Anesthesiologists have an important role in acute, subacute, and long-term management. Identifying the phase of an electrical storm and understanding the characteristics of each morphology may help the anesthesiologist anticipate the management approach. In the acute phase, management of an electrical storm is aimed at providing advanced cardiac life support and identifying reversible causes. After initial stabilization, subacute management focuses on dampening the sympathetic surge with sedation, thoracic epidural, or stellate ganglion blockade. Definitive long-term management with surgical sympathectomy or catheter ablation also may be warranted. Our objective is to provide an overview of electrical storms and the anesthesiologist's role in management.

Retrospective Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Intraoperative Methadone for Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Elective Intracranial Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing intracranial surgery experience significant perioperative pain and are typically treated with short-acting opioids. Methadone, with its prolonged half-life and multimodal central nervous system effects, presents a promising option for managing postcraniotomy pain. Despite its proven efficacy in other types of surgeries, the use of methadone in patients undergoing craniotomy has not yet been explored. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for 60 adult patients ranging in age from 18 to 81 years who received methadone during intracranial surgeries. The primary outcome of interest was the total opioid consumption in oral morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) and patient-reported pain scores within 24 hours and up to 72 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: The methadone dosage varied from 5 to 20 mg. In the infratentorial group, the median total MME on postoperative day 1, 2, and 3 was 30.5, 17, and 0.8, respectively, with mean pain scores of 3.56, 3.91, and 2.71. In the supratentorial group, the median total MME on postoperative day 1, 2, and 3 was 17.85, 15.4, and 1.2, with mean pain scores of 2.31, 1.68, and 2.21, respectively. Patients who were chronic opioid users had significantly higher pain scores and average opioid use (P < 0.05). None of the patients required administration of naloxone or airway interventions. Comparison with the historical control showed that our study patients had lower pain scores and MME. CONCLUSIONS: The single intraoperative dose of methadone is well tolerated by adult patients undergoing various types of intracranial surgeries, with minimal side effects, including elderly patients aged 65 years or older.