Sequence of Events in the Pathogenesis of Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Current Review-2023 SPARTAN Meeting Proceedings.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Over the past two decades, significant progress has been made to untangle the etiology of inflammation and new bone formation (NBF) associated with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). However, exact mechanisms as to how the disease initiates and develops remain elusive. RECENT FINDINGS: Type 3 immunity, centered around the IL-23/IL-17 axis, has been recognized as a key player in the pathogenesis of axSpA. Multiple hypotheses associated with HLA-B*27 have been proposed to account for disease onset and progression of axSpA, potentially by driving downstream T cell responses. However, HLA-B*27 alone is not sufficient to fully explain the development of axSpA. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identified several genes that are potentially relevant to disease pathogenesis leading to a better understanding of the immune activation seen in axSpA. Furthermore, gut microbiome studies suggest an altered microbiome in axSpA, and animal studies suggest a pathogenic role for immune cells migrating from the gut to the joint. Recent studies focusing on the pathogenesis of new bone formation (NBF) have highlighted the importance of endochondral ossification, mechanical stress, pre-existing inflammation, and activated anabolic signaling pathways during the development of NBF. Despite the complex etiology of axSpA, recent studies have shed light on pivotal pieces that could lead to a better understanding of the pathogenic events in axSpA.

Prostaglandin E2/EP4 axis is upregulated in Spondyloarthritis and contributes to radiographic progression.

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is an inflammatory disease leading to spine ankylosis; however, the mechanisms behind new bone formation are still not fully understood. Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in PTGER4, encoding for the receptor EP4 of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), are associated with AS. Since the PGE2-EP4 axis participates in inflammation and bone metabolism, this work aims at investigating the influence of the prostaglandin-E2 axis on radiographic progression in AS. In 185 AS (97 progressors), baseline serum PGE2 predicted progression, and PTGER4 SNP rs6896969 was more frequent in progressors. Increased EP4/PTGER4 expression was observed in AS circulating immune cells, synovial tissue, and bone marrow. CD14highEP4 + cells frequency correlated with disease activity, and when monocytes were cocultured with mesenchymal stem cells, the PGE2/EP4 axis induced bone formation. In conclusion, the Prostaglandin E2 axis is involved in bone remodelling and may contribute to the radiographic progression in AS due to genetic and environmental upregulation.

TYK2 inhibition reduces type 3 immunity and modifies disease progression in murine spondyloarthritis.

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) represents a family of inflammatory diseases of the spine and peripheral joints. Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is the prototypic form of SpA in which progressive disease can lead to fusion of the spine. Therapeutically, knowledge of type 3 immunity has translated into the development of IL-23- and IL-17A-blocking antibodies for the treatment of SpA. Despite being able to provide symptomatic control, the current biologics do not prevent the fusion of joints in AS patients. Thus, there is an unmet need for disease-modifying drugs. Genetic studies have linked the Janus kinase TYK2 to AS. TYK2 is a mediator of type 3 immunity through intracellular signaling of IL-23. Here, we describe and characterize a potentially novel small-molecule inhibitor of TYK2 that blocked IL-23 signaling in vitro and inhibited disease progression in animal models of SpA. The effect of the inhibitor appears to be TYK2 specific, using TYK2-inactive mice, which further revealed a duality in the induction of IL-17A and IL-22 by IL-23. Specifically, IL-22 production was TYK2/JAK2/STAT3 dependent, while IL-17A was mostly JAK2 dependent. Finally, we examined the effects of AS-associated TYK2 SNPs on TYK2 expression and function and correlated them with AS disease progression. This work provides evidence that TYK2 inhibitors have great potential as an orally delivered therapeutic for SpA.

Pilot randomized controlled trials in the orthopaedic surgery literature: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this systematic review is to examine the characteristics of pilot randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the orthopaedic surgery literature, including the proportion framed as feasibility trials and those that lead to definitive RCTs. This review aim to answer the question of whether pilot RCTs lead to definitive RCTs, whilst investigating the quality, feasibility and overall publication trends of orthopaedic pilot trials. METHODS: Pilot RCTs in the orthopaedic literature were identified from three electronic databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Pubmed) searched from database inception to January 2018. Search criteria included the evaluation of at least one orthopaedic surgical intervention, research on humans, and publication in English. Two reviewers independently screened the pool of pilot trials, and conducted a search for corresponding definitive trials. Screened pilot RCTs were assessed for feasibility outcomes related to efficiency, cost, and/or timeliness of a large-scale clinical trial involving a surgical intervention. The quality of the pilot and definitive trials were assessed using the Checklist to Evaluate a Report of a Non-Pharmacological Trial (CLEAR NPT). RESULTS: The initial search for pilot RCTs yielded 3857 titles, of which 49 articles were relevant for this review. 73.5% (36/49) of the orthopaedic pilot RCTs were framed as feasibility trials. Of these, 5 corresponding definitive trials (10.2%) were found, of which four were published and one ongoing. Based on author responses, the lack of a definitive RCT following the pilot trial was attributed to a lack of funding, inadequacies in recruitment, and belief that the pilot RCT sufficiently answered the research question. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this systematic review, most pilot RCTs were characterized as feasibility trials. However, the majority of published pilot RCTs did not lead to definitive trials. This discrepancy was mainly attributed to poor feasibility (e.g. poor recruitment) and lack of funding for an orthopaedic surgical definitive trial. In recent years this discrepancy may be due to researchers saving on time and cost by rolling their pilot patients into the definitive RCT rather than publish a separate pilot trial.