Safety and effectiveness of Janus kinase inhibitors in the management of inflammatory bowel disease following liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with concurrent liver transplantation is challenging, and data regarding the safety and efficacy of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors with anti-rejection medications are required. We report the experience of all liver transplant recipients receiving tofacitinib and/or upadacitinib for IBD across three states in Australia. METHODS: All liver transplant recipients from the Australian states of Victoria, New South Wales and Tasmania who required tofacitinib or upadacitinib for the treatment of IBD were identified using prospectively maintained liver transplant databases. Patients were followed up until medication cessation or last follow up. Clinical safety and efficacy data were collected. RESULTS: Eight patients (median age 30 years) were included, seven of whom received first-line JAK inhibition with tofacitinib. All patients had failed one or more biologic therapies prior to commencing JAK inhibition, including six patients who had failed two or more agents. JAK inhibition was continued for a median of 17 months, with 143 patient-months of combined follow-up. The anti-rejection medication tacrolimus was prescribed in all patients. Overall, seven (88%) patients achieved clinical remission, including all three patients who were switched from tofacitinib to upadacitinib. One patient required colectomy after 1 month of treatment. There were no other cases of serious infection, venous thromboembolism or major adverse cardiovascular events during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: As the largest case series to-date, these data indicate that combining JAK inhibition with transplant anti-rejection medication may be a safe and clinically effective method of treating IBD in patients with prior biologic failure.

Treat to target in Crohn's disease: A practical guide for clinicians.

A treat-to-target (T2T) approach applies the principles of early intervention and tight disease control to optimise long-term outcomes in Crohn's disease. The Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE)-II guidelines specify short, intermediate, and long-term treatment goals, documenting specific treatment targets to be achieved at each of these timepoints. Scheduled appraisal of Crohn's disease activity against pre-defined treatment targets at these timepoints remains central to determining whether current therapy should be continued or modified. Consensus treatment targets in Crohn's disease comprise combination clinical and patient-reported outcome remission, in conjunction with biomarker normalisation and endoscopic healing. Although the STRIDE-II guidelines endorse the pursuit of endoscopic healing, clinicians must consider that this may not always be appropriate, acceptable, or achievable in all patients. This underscores the need to engage patients at the outset in an effort to personalise care and individualise treatment targets. The use of non-invasive biomarkers such as faecal calprotectin in conjunction with cross-sectional imaging techniques, particularly intestinal ultrasound, holds great promise; as do emerging treatment targets such as transmural healing. Two randomised clinical trials, namely, CALM and STARDUST, have evaluated the efficacy of a T2T approach in achieving endoscopic endpoints in patients with Crohn's disease. Findings from these studies reflect that patient subgroups and Crohn's disease characteristics likely to benefit most from a T2T approach, remain to be clarified. Moreover, outside of clinical trials, data pertaining to the real-world effectiveness of a T2T approach remains scare, highlighting the need for pragmatic real-world studies. Despite the obvious promise of a T2T approach, a lack of guidance to support its integration into real-world clinical practice has the potential to limit its uptake. This highlights the need to describe strategies, processes, and models of care capable of supporting the integration and execution of a T2T approach in real-world clinical practice. Hence, this review seeks to examine the current and emerging literature to provide clinicians with practical guidance on how to incorporate the principles of T2T into routine clinical practice for the management of Crohn's disease.

Outcomes out to 12 months after sequential use of high-dose tofacitinib following infliximab in acute severe ulcerative colitis.

Acute severe colitis (ASUC) remains a significant cause of morbidity in up to 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis during their disease course. We present the outcomes out to 12 months following the use of high-dose tofacitinib, 10 mg three times daily (TDS), in patients with steroid and infliximab refractory ASUC. A total of 11 patients with ASUC who were treated with high-dose tofacitinib after failing sequential infliximab therapy between 2019 and 2021 were identified at an Australian tertiary centre. Ten of 11 patients demonstrated clinical and biochemical response to treatment during admission. Two of 11 patients required colectomy, one during the index admission and the other during re-admission 10 days after the index presentation. Nine of the initial responders had a median Mayo score of 1 (IQR 0-4) at both 6 and 12 months, and all remained colectomy-free out to 12 months. Neither venous thromboembolic events nor major infective complications were observed. Tofacitinib may be a safe and effective induction and maintenance agent in the treatment of steroid and infliximab refractory ASUC. Prospective studies with long-term follow-up are required to explore the use of tofacitinib in ASUC before it can be routinely recommended as salvage therapy.

Dose intensification strategy influences infliximab pharmacokinetics but not clinical response after the same number of doses.

BACKGROUND: The optimal infliximab dose intensification strategy to address secondary loss of response (LOR) remains unclear. This study aimed to compare clinical and pharmacokinetic outcomes following (i) upfront infliximab re-induction with (ii) ongoing 6-weekly dose interval shortening (DIS), after the same number of doses. METHODS: A prospective parallel cohort study of inflammatory bowel disease patients who required infliximab dose intensification for secondary LOR using (i) re-induction (i.e., repeat 5 mg/kg 0, 2, 6-week dosing) followed by 8-weekly maintenance or (ii) 6-weekly 5 mg/kg DIS was undertaken. Week 32 clinical response was the primary outcome, with secondary evaluation of infliximab pharmacokinetics and predictors of response. RESULTS: Of 104 patients, 54 underwent re-induction, and 50 underwent 6-weekly DIS; 43 per cohort had clinically active disease, with comparable baseline infliximab levels (2.03 vs 2.02 ug/mL, P = 0.83). Clinical response was similar across re-induction and DIS cohorts at weeks 12 (69.8 vs 65.1%) and 32 (53.5 vs 62.8%, each P > 0.50); however, both strategies demonstrated distinct pharmacokinetic profiles at weeks 6 (18.45 vs 5.36 ug/mL, P < 0.01), 12 (8.94 vs 5.96 ug/mL, P = 0.02) and 30 (3.89 vs 6.35 ug/mL, P = .0.02). In multivariable analyses, objectively verified active disease at baseline (OR 12.92, 95% CI [1.84-90.84], P = 0.01), subtherapeutic week 6 infliximab levels (OR 0.12, 95% CI [0.01, 0.99], P = 0.049) and week 12 clinical response (OR 5.44, 95% CI [1.20-19.97], P = 0.04) were associated with week 32 response, as were week 2 infliximab levels (OR 1.34, 95% CI [1.02-1.47], P = 0.04) following re-induction. Following re-induction, week 2 infliximab levels <15.6 ug/mL (AUROC 0.76, 95% CI [0.54-0.99], P < 0.05) predicted nonresponse at week 32. CONCLUSION: Dose intensification strategy impacted immediate and sustained infliximab levels but not clinical response. Upfront intensification was associated with short-term pharmacokinetic advantages, including predictors of response, that diminished with time. Hence, when applying upfront dose intensification, clinicians should consider continuing intensified dosing to sustain early pharmacokinetic advantages based on predictors of (non)response.

Upadacitinib in end stage renal disease: A case of acute severe ulcerative colitis.

Recent data, indicating that inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may be a risk factor for future chronic kidney disease, highlight the need to study the safety and clinical effectiveness of advanced IBD therapies in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD), defined as an eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73m2. Upadacitinib, a selective oral Janus kinase (JAK) 1 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in the management of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. There is also emerging data indicating that JAK inhibition may be clinically effective in the setting of steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). There is, however, a lack of "real-world" data documenting the use of JAK inhibitors in patients with ESRD. Here, we report the use of upadacitinib in a patient with ESRD for the management of steroid-refractory ASUC, demonstrating, for the first time, the safe and clinically effective use of upadacitinib in this population.

The Nocebo Effect in a Non-Medical Switching Program from Originator to Biosimilar Infliximab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Despite growing awareness of the nocebo effect, few studies have evaluated the nocebo effect using combined assessment of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), clinical indices, and objective biomarkers in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients switching from originator to biosimilar medicines. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare these outcomes across switch and non-switch cohorts to evaluate the nocebo effect in patients with IBD. METHODS: Parallel cohorts of IBD patients who (1) switched from originator to biosimilar (CT-P13) infliximab and (2) continued biosimilar (CT-P13) infliximab were evaluated over 32 weeks. Clinical disease activity, objective biomarkers and PROMs were assessed at baseline, and weeks 16 and 32 across both cohorts. The PROM of interest was patient-perceived disease activity evaluated using a 0-100 visual analogue scale (VAS) per the IBD-Control Questionnaire. RESULTS: Of 81 patients, 47 switched from originator to biosimilar (CT-P13) infliximab. A negative change from baseline patient-reported disease control was observed across the switch cohort compared with the non-switch cohort at week 16 (mean VAS - 8.21 vs. 1.26; p = 0.03), but not at week 32 (mean VAS - 1.21 vs. 1.38; p = 0.58). Corresponding clinical and objective biomarker assessments over these timepoints were comparable across both cohorts. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a temporary yet discernible nocebo effect in the first 16 weeks following non-medical switching that was not sustained at week 32. Negative patient perceptions may be overcome by a patient-inclusive approach to non-medical switching in conjunction with close clinical follow-up and disease monitoring.

Systematic review and meta-analysis: evaluating response to empiric anti-TNF dose intensification for secondary loss of response in Crohn's disease.

INTRODUCTION: Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) dose intensification represents an effective method of overcoming secondary loss of response (LOR); however, a subset of patients may not respond (tertiary non-response), or fail to demonstrate durable response (tertiary LOR) to intensified dosing. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate these outcomes to determine the clinical effectiveness of empiric dose intensification in Crohn's disease. METHODS: Multiple databases including MEDLINE and EMBASE were interrogated to identify studies that reported outcomes following anti-TNF dose intensification to address secondary LOR in Crohn's disease. Studies that used anti-TNF levels as the primary basis for dose intensification were excluded. Studies that reported (1) tertiary response and tertiary non-response within 6 months or (2) tertiary response and tertiary LOR beyond 6 months, were pooled using a random effects model with risk ratio (RR) derived, quantifying the effect of each comparison. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies reported outcomes following anti-TNF dose intensification to address secondary LOR. Short-term response within 12 weeks of any dose-intensification strategy was 33-90%, while sustained response (⩾48 weeks) was achieved in 25-85%. Tertiary non-response occurred in up to 45% of intensified patients within 6 months of anti-TNF dose intensification, while tertiary LOR beyond 6 months occurred in up to 64% of patients. Tertiary response was more likely than tertiary non-response within 6 months (RR 2.58, 95% CI (1.76, 3.79), I 2 = 82%, 12 studies), while sustained response beyond 6 months compared to tertiary LOR (RR 1.10 (0.75, 1.61) I 2 = 85%, 7 studies) was less convincing. CONCLUSION: Although anti-TNF dose intensification is clinically effective in patients with Crohn's disease, particularly within the first 6 months, a proportion of patients will fail to demonstrate short-term and/or sustained clinical response. Hence, clinical reassessment following anti-TNF dose intensification, particularly beyond 6 months, remains important to differentiate between effective and ineffective dose-intensification strategies.

Higher Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor-α Levels Correlate With Improved Radiologic Outcomes in Crohn's Perianal Fistulas.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Higher anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF) drug levels are associated with improved clinical healing of Crohn's perianal fistulas. It is unclear whether this leads to improved healing on radiologic assessment. We aimed to evaluate the association between anti-TNF drug levels and radiologic outcomes in perianal fistulising Crohn's disease. METHODS: A cross-sectional retrospective multicenter study was undertaken. Patients with perianal fistulising Crohn's disease on maintenance infliximab or adalimumab, with drug levels within 6 months of perianal magnetic resonance imaging were included. Patients receiving dose changes or fistula surgery between drug level and imaging were excluded. Radiologic disease activity was scored using the Van Assche Index, with an inflammatory subscore calculated using indices: T2-weighted imaging hyperintensity, collections >3 mm diameter, rectal wall involvement. Primary endpoint was radiologic healing (inflammatory subscore ≤6). Secondary endpoint was radiologic remission (inflammatory subscore = 0). RESULTS: Of 193 patients (infliximab, n = 117; adalimumab, n = 76), patients with radiologic healing had higher median drug levels compared with those with active disease (infliximab 6.0 vs 3.9 µg/mL; adalimumab 9.1 vs 6.2 µg/mL; both P < .05). Patients with radiologic remission also had higher median drug levels compared with those with active disease (infliximab 7.4 vs 3.9 µg/mL; P < .05; adalimumab 9.8 vs 6.2 µg/mL; P = .07). There was a significant incremental reduction in median inflammatory subscores with higher anti-TNF drug level tertiles. CONCLUSIONS: Higher anti-TNF drug levels were associated with improved radiologic outcomes on magnetic resonance imaging in perianal fistulising Crohn's disease, with an incremental improvement at higher drug level tertiles for both infliximab and adalimumab.

Sequential Use of High-Dose Tofacitinib After Infliximab Salvage Therapy in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Preliminary data regarding the effectiveness of tofacitinib in acute severe ulcerative colitis [ASUC] have been presented in two previous case series. We aimed to describe the novel use of high-dose tofacitinib immediately following non-response to infliximab in the setting of steroid-refractory ASUC. METHODS: Five patients who received high-dose tofacitinib 10 mg three times a day immediately following non-response to infliximab for steroid-refractory ASUC were identified at an Australian tertiary inflammatory bowel disease centre. RESULTS: Four of the five patients demonstrated clinical response to high-dose tofacitinib induction during their inpatient admission, with one patient requiring colectomy owing to a lack of clinical response. At 90 days, all four initial responders remained colectomy-free, with two patients achieving combined clinical and endoscopic remission. No adverse events directly attributable to high-dose tofacitinib were identified. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose tofacitinib may have a role as salvage therapy in the setting of steroid-refractory ASUC. Prospective studies are required to determine the safety and efficacy of high-dose tofacitinib to determine whether it can be routinely recommended as primary or sequential salvage therapy in the setting of steroid-refractory ASUC.