RESUMEN
Background: Staple-line reinforcement has been used to decrease complications such as staple-line bleeding (SLB) and staple-line leaks (SLLs) in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG). There is little data comparing bioabsorbable mesh reinforcement (BMR) with oversewing the staple line (OSL). The aim of our study was to compare BMR with OSL in SG. Materials and Methods: This is a single-institution retrospective analysis comparing risks and benefits of BMR (group a) with those of OSL (group b) for SG staple-line reinforcement between 2015 and 2020. Results: In total, 857 patients were identified. There were 452 (52.74%) in group a and 405 (47.26%) in group b. SLB requiring transfusion occurred in 6 (1.32%) patients in group a and 6 (1.48%) patients in group b, NS (P = .848). Zero SLL was identified in either group. One-year mean direct cost of SG in group a was $7881 compared with $6677 in group b. Conclusion: This retrospective study showed that there was low risk of bleeding or leak with either technique of staple-line reinforcement and there was no significant difference in SLB or leak rate with bioabsorbable mesh versus oversewing. The use of bioabsorbable mesh was more expensive than oversewing.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) may increase the risk of venous thromboembolic complications; however, early prevention with heparinoids is often withheld for its anticoagulant effect. New evidence suggests low molecular weight heparin reduces cerebral edema and improves neurological recovery after stroke and TBI, through blunting of cerebral leukocyte (LEU) recruitment. It remains unknown if unfractionated heparin (UFH) similarly affects brain inflammation and neurological recovery post-TBI. We hypothesized that UFH after TBI reduces cerebral edema by reducing LEU-mediated inflammation and improves neurological recovery. METHODS: CD1 male mice underwent either TBI by controlled cortical impact (CCI) or sham craniotomy. UFH (75 U/kg or 225 U/kg) or vehicle (VEH, 0.9% saline) was administered 2, 11, 20, 27, and 34 hours after TBI. At 48 hours, pial intravital microscopy through a craniotomy was used to visualize live brain LEUs interacting with endothelium and microvascular fluorescein isothiocyanate-albumin leakage. Neurologic function (Garcia Neurological Test, GNT) and body weight loss ratios were evaluated 24 and 48 hours after TBI. Cerebral and lung wet-to-dry ratios were evaluated post mortem. ANOVA with Bonferroni correction was used to determine significance (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Compared to positive controls (CCI), both UFH doses reduced post-TBI in vivo LEU rolling on endothelium, concurrent cerebrovascular albumin leakage, and ipsilateral cerebral water content after TBI. Additionally, only low dose UFH (75 U/kg) improved GNT at both 24 and 48 hours after TBI. High dose UFH (225 U/kg) significantly increased body weight loss above sham at 48 hours. Differences in lung water content and blood pressure between groups were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: UFH after TBI reduces LEU recruitment, microvascular permeability, and brain edema to injured brain. Lower UFH doses concurrently improve neurological recovery whereas higher UFH may worsen functional recovery. Further study is needed to determine if this is caused by increased bleeding from injured brain with higher UFH doses.
