Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of augmentation pharmacotherapy with aripiprazole for treatment-resistant depression in late life: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Treatment-resistant major depression is common and potentially life-threatening in elderly people, in whom little is known about the benefits and risks of augmentation pharmacotherapy. We aimed to assess whether aripiprazole is associated with a higher probability of remission than is placebo. METHODS: We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at three centres in the USA and Canada to test the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole augmentation for adults aged older than 60 years with treatment-resistant depression (Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] score of ≥15). Patients who did not achieve remission during a pre-trial with venlafaxine extended-release (150-300 mg/day) were randomly assigned (1:1) to the addition of aripiprazole (target dose 10 mg [maximum 15 mg] daily) daily or placebo for 12 weeks. The computer-generated randomisation was done in blocks and stratified by site. Only the database administrator and research pharmacists had knowledge of treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was remission, defined as an MADRS score of 10 or less (and at least 2 points below the score at the start of the randomised phase) at both of the final two consecutive visits, analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00892047. FINDINGS: From July 20, 2009, to Dec 30, 2013, we recruited 468 eligible participants, 181 (39%) of whom did not remit and were randomly assigned to aripiprazole (n=91) or placebo (n=90). A greater proportion of participants in the aripiprazole group achieved remission than did those in the placebo group (40 [44%] vs 26 [29%] participants; odds ratio [OR] 2·0 [95% CI 1·1-3·7], p=0·03; number needed to treat [NNT] 6·6 [95% CI 3·5-81·8]). Akathisia was the most common adverse effect of aripiprazole (reported in 24 [26%] of 91 participants on aripiprazole vs 11 [12%] of 90 on placebo). Compared with placebo, aripiprazole was also associated with more Parkinsonism (15 [17%] of 86 vs two [2%] of 81 participants), but not with treatment-emergent suicidal ideation (13 [21%] of 61 vs 19 [29%] of 65 participants) or other measured safety variables. INTERPRETATION: In adults aged 60 years or older who do not achieve remission from depression with a first-line antidepressant, the addition of aripiprazole is effective in achieving and sustaining remission. Tolerability concerns include the potential for akathisia and Parkinsonism. FUNDING: National Institute of Mental Health, UPMC Endowment in Geriatric Psychiatry, Taylor Family Institute for Innovative Psychiatric Research, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, and the Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute.

Depression Remission Rates Among Older Black and White Adults: Analyses From the IRL-GREY Trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study explored whether older black and white adults with major depressive disorder differed in rates of remission or attrition during open-label treatment with venlafaxine and supportive care. METHODS: A total of 47 black (10%) and 412 white (90%) adults age ≥60 were treated with open-label venlafaxine extended-release (≤300 mg per day) for 12-14 weeks during the initial phase of an multisite, randomized, placebo-controlled augmentation trial. Participants were help-seeking older adults with nonpsychotic major depressive disorder (single or recurrent episode) referred from specialty clinics, primary care practices, advertisements, and research programs. Remission was defined as a Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale score of ≤10 for two consecutive assessments at the end of 12 weeks. Kaplan-Meier curves displayed time to dropout and time to initial remission. Cox proportional hazards models assessed differences in attrition and remission rates. RESULTS: Black participants had greater baseline general medical comorbidity, worse physical health-related quality of life, and poorer cognitive function than white participants. White participants were more likely to have received an adequate trial of antidepressant and psychotherapy before study entry. Baseline depression severity, depression duration, age at onset, and recurrence history did not differ between groups. The groups had similar final doses of venlafaxine and similar rates of attrition and remission. Side-effect profiles were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite greater medical comorbidity, lower cognitive function, and less adequate prior exposure to antidepressant treatment and psychotherapy, black participants were no more likely to discontinue antidepressant pharmacotherapy and experienced a rate of remission comparable to white participants.

Early intervention to preempt major depression among older black and white adults.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to assess the efficacy of problem-solving therapy for primary care (PST-PC) for preventing episodes of major depression and mitigating depressive symptoms of older black and white adults. The comparison group received dietary coaching. METHODS: A total of 247 participants (90 blacks, 154 whites, and three Asians) with subsyndromal depressive symptoms were recruited into a randomized depression prevention trial that compared effects of individually delivered PST-PC and dietary coaching on time to major depressive episode and level of depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory) over two years. Cumulative intervention time averaged 5.5-6.0 hours in each study arm. RESULTS: The two groups did not differ significantly in time to major depressive episodes, and incidence of such episodes was low (blacks, N=8, 9%; whites, N=13, 8%), compared with published rates of 20%-25% over one year among persons with subsyndromal symptoms and receiving care as usual. Participants also showed a mean decrease of 4 points in depressive symptoms, sustained over two years. Despite greater burden of depression risk factors among blacks, no significant differences from whites were found in the primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Both PST-PC and dietary coaching are potentially effective in protecting older black and white adults with subsyndromal depressive symptoms from developing episodes of major depression over two years. Absent a control for concurrent usual care, this conclusion is preliminary. If confirmed, both interventions hold promise as scalable, safe, nonstigmatizing interventions for delaying or preventing episodes of major depression in the nation's increasingly diverse older population.

Treating depression to remission in older adults: a controlled evaluation of combined escitalopram with interpersonal psychotherapy versus escitalopram with depression care management.

OBJECTIVE: More than half of the older adults respond only partially to first-line antidepressant pharmacotherapy. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that a depression-specific psychotherapy, Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT), when used adjunctively with escitalopram, would lead to a higher rate of remission and faster resolution of symptoms in partial responders than escitalopram with depression care management (DCM). METHOD: We conducted a 16-week randomized clinical trial of IPT and DCM in partial responders to escitalopram, enrolling 124 outpatients aged 60 and older. The primary outcome, remission, was defined as three consecutive weekly scores of 7 or less on the Hamilton rating scale for depression (17-item). We conducted Cox regression analyses of time to remission and logistic modeling for rates of remission. We tested group differences in Hamilton depression ratings over time via mixed-effects modeling. RESULTS: Remission rates for escitalopram with IPT and with DCM were similar in intention-to-treat (IPT vs. DCM: 58 [95% CI: 46, 71] vs. 45% [33,58]; p = 0.14) and completer analyses (IPT vs. DCM: 58% [95% CI: 44,72] vs. 43% [30,57]; p = 0.20). Rapidity of symptom improvement did not differ in the two treatments. CONCLUSION: No added advantage of IPT over DCM was shown. DCM is a clinically useful strategy to achieve full remission in about 50% of partial responders.

A comparison of the frequencies of risk factors for depression in older black and white participants in a study of indicated prevention.

BACKGROUND: To compare the frequencies of risk factors, we describe risks for depression as a function of race among consecutively admitted participants in a randomized clinical trial of indicated depression prevention in later life. METHODS: Seventy-two black and 143 white participants were screened for risk factors for depression. RESULTS: Black participants were more likely to have fewer years of education and lower household income. They were more likely to be obese, live alone, experience functional disability, have a history of alcohol and drug abuse, and have lower scores on the Mini-mental State Examination and the Executive Interview (EXIT). White participants were not found to have greater prevalence or higher mean score on any risk factor. On average, black participants experienced approximately one more risk factor than white participants (t(213) = 3.32, p = 0.0011). CONCLUSIONS: In our sample, black participants had higher frequencies of eight risk factors for depression and a greater mean number of risk factors compared to white participants.

Preventing depression in later life: translation from concept to experimental design and implementation.

OBJECTIVE: The authors detail the public health need for depression prevention research and the decisions made in designing an experiment testing problem solving therapy as "indicated" preventive intervention for high-risk older adults with subsyndromal depression. Special attention is given to the recruitment of African Americans because of well-documented inequalities in mental health services and depression treatment outcomes between races. METHODS: A total of 306 subjects (half white, half African American) with scores of 16 or higher on the Center for Epidemiological Studies of Depression Scale, but with no history of major depressive disorder in the past 12 months, are being recruited and randomly assigned to either problem solving therapy-primary care or to a dietary education control condition. Time to, and rate of, incident episodes of major depressive disorder are to be modeled using survival analysis. Level of depressive symptoms will be analyzed via a mixed models approach. RESULTS: Twenty-two subjects have been recruited into the study, and to date eight have completed the randomly assigned intervention and postintervention assessment. Four of 22 have exited after developing major depressive episodes. None have complained about study procedures or demands. Implementation in a variety of community settings is going well. CONCLUSION: The data collected to date support the feasibility of translating from epidemiology to RCT design and implementation of empirical depression prevention research in later life.

Recovery from major depression in older adults receiving augmentation of antidepressant pharmacotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: Few data are available concerning the utility of augmentation in late-life depression treatment. The authors examined likelihood, speed, and predictors of recovery in older adults receiving augmentation pharmacotherapy after inadequate response to standardized treatment with paroxetine plus interpersonal psychotherapy. METHOD: Depression levels were monitored during open treatment in 195 adults age 70 or older. Patients were grouped by whether they required augmentation (bupropion, nortriptyline, or lithium) and compared on likelihood, time, and predictors of recovery. RESULTS: Augmentation was required for 105 patients (53.8%) because of inadequate treatment response (N=77) or response followed by relapse (N=28). Of these patients, 69 received augmentation and 36 did not (primarily because of consent withdrawal or comorbid medical conditions). Patients receiving augmentation showed lower recovery rates than patients never requiring augmentation: recovery occurred in 50.0% of patients receiving it because of inadequate response, 66.7% of those receiving it after early relapse, and 86.7% of patients never requiring augmentation. Patients receiving augmentation because of inadequate response recovered more slowly, with modestly more side effects than other patients. Greater medical burden and anxiety predicted slower recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a lower likelihood of recovery in elderly people receiving augmentation, the recovery by over one-half of such patients suggests the value of augmentation for those able to tolerate it. Need for augmentation presages slower recovery in patients showing initial inadequate response; those requiring it after early relapse recovered more quickly. Strategies to further improve the likelihood and speed of recovery after initial treatment failure are needed.

Developmental outcomes at the age of two years for very premature babies managed with nasal prong continuous positive airway pressure.

AIMS: To describe the developmental progress of very premature babies at the age of 2 years, who were managed in an era where nasal prong continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was the preferred method for the management of initial respiratory disease. METHODS: Two groups of very premature babies of <32 weeks gestation were compared, the first being managed with an intubation and mandatory ventilation approach, and the second being managed with a CPAP approach. The groups are compared with regard to the presence of brain injury, retinopathy and requiring discharge home on oxygen and then at 2 years, for language impairment, non-ambulatory cerebral palsy and significant developmental delay. The study is designed as an audit of data collected prospectively and longitudinally for babies born from 1998 to 2002. RESULTS: A significant number of babies were successfully managed on CPAP in the second era and significantly fewer received post-natal steroids. The number being discharged home on oxygen, brain injury and retinopathy were similar in the two groups. Developmental outcome assessed at 2 years of age was the same in both eras. CONCLUSIONS: A CPAP approach to the management of initial respiratory disease in premature babies of less than 32 weeks gestation at birth is associated with no measurable developmental advantage or disadvantage at 2 years of age.

Impact of prior treatment exposure on response to antidepressant treatment in late life.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the correlates of prior antidepressant exposure and its association with response to protocolized treatment in older patients with major depression. METHODS: Based on their prior antidepressant treatment exposure, 193 elderly patients with a major depressive episode were divided into three groups: those with no prior treatment for their current episode (not treated [TN]), those with antidepressant trials of inadequate dose or duration ("treatment-inadequate" [TI]), and those with at least one adequate trial but persisting depression ("treatment-resistant" [TR]). All patients then received protocolized treatment with interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) and paroxetine plus pharmacologic augmentation if needed. The demographic, clinical, and outcome information were compared among these three groups. RESULTS: Approximately one-third of the patients referred to the study had been adequately treated (TR), one-third had been inadequately treated (TI), and one-third were not treated for the current episode (TN). Treatment completion rates and reasons for dropping out did not differ statistically among TR, TI, and TN patients. TR patients took longer to respond (13.0 weeks) than either TI or TN patients (7.6 and 8.0 weeks, respectively). TR and TI patients had lower response rates (67% and 71%) than TN patients (86%). CONCLUSIONS: Prior treatment exposure is an important correlate of course and outcome in late-life depression. Most TR and TI patients eventually respond, but TR patients may require more intensive and longer courses of treatment than TI and TN patients.

What is the optimal duration of a short-term antidepressant trial when treating geriatric depression?

BACKGROUND: To determine the optimal duration of an antidepressant trial in elderly patients, the authors examined the probability of eventually responding to treatment based on early improvement. METHODS: Four hundred seventy-two elderly patients with major depression (nonpsychotic, nonbipolar) were treated under protocolized conditions for up to 12 weeks and assessed weekly with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. The probability of full response after 12 weeks of treatment was calculated in patients who had not fully responded after periods of treatment that lasted for 4 to 10 weeks. RESULTS: Most of the patients who had shown a partial improvement after 4 weeks of treatment became full responders after 4 or more additional weeks of treatment. By contrast, only a few of those who were nonresponders became full responders even after up to 8 additional weeks of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: After 4 weeks of treatment, it is possible to reliably identify a subgroup of elderly patients with depression who are more likely to benefit from a change in their treatment than from a few additional weeks of treatment with the same agent.

Maintenance treatment of major depression in old age.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients with major depression, including those having a first episode, are at high risk for recurrence of depression, disability, and death. METHODS: We tested the efficacy of maintenance paroxetine and monthly interpersonal psychotherapy in patients 70 years of age or older who had depression (55 percent of whom were having a first episode) in a 2-by-2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Among patients with a response to treatment with paroxetine and psychotherapy, 116 were randomly assigned to one of four maintenance-treatment programs (either paroxetine or placebo combined with either monthly psychotherapy or clinical-management sessions) for two years or until the recurrence of major depression. Clinical-management sessions, conducted by the same nurses, social workers, and psychologists who provided psychotherapy, involved discussion of symptoms. RESULTS: Major depression recurred within two years in 35 percent of the patients receiving paroxetine and psychotherapy, 37 percent of those receiving paroxetine and clinical-management sessions, 68 percent of those receiving placebo and psychotherapy, and 58 percent of those receiving placebo and clinical-management sessions (P=0.02). After adjustment for the effect of psychotherapy, the relative risk of recurrence among those receiving placebo was 2.4 times (95 percent confidence interval, 1.4 to 4.2) that among those receiving paroxetine. The number of patients needed to be treated with paroxetine to prevent one recurrence was 4 (95 percent confidence interval, 2.3 to 10.9). Patients with fewer and less severe coexisting medical conditions (such as hypertension or cardiac disease) received greater benefit from paroxetine (P=0.03 for the interaction between treatment with paroxetine and baseline severity of medical illness). CONCLUSIONS: Patients 70 years of age or older with major depression who had a response to initial treatment with paroxetine and psychotherapy were less likely to have recurrent depression if they received two years of maintenance therapy with paroxetine. Monthly maintenance psychotherapy did not prevent recurrent depression. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00178100.).

Late-onset major depression: clinical and treatment-response variability.

OBJECTIVE: To explore clinical and treatment-response variability in late-onset vs early-onset non-bipolar, non-psychotic major depression. METHODS: We grouped patients from a late-life depression treatment study according to illness-course characteristics: those with early-onset, recurrent depression (n = 59), late-onset, recurrent depression (n = 27), and late-onset, single-episode depression (n = 95). Early-onset was defined as having a first lifetime episode of major depression at age 59 or earlier; late-onset was defined as having a first episode of major depression at age 60 or later. We characterized the three groups of patients with respect to baseline demographic, neuropsychological, and clinical characteristics, use of augmentation pharmacotherapy to achieve response, and treatment outcomes. RESULTS: Rates of response, remission, relapse, and termination were similar in all three groups; however, patients with late-onset, recurrent major depression took longer to respond to treatment than those with late-onset, single-episode depression (12 weeks vs 8 weeks) and had more cognitive and functional impairment. Additionally, patients with recurrent depression (whether early or late) were more likely to require pharmacotherapy augmentation to achieve response than patients with a single lifetime episode. CONCLUSION: Late-onset, recurrent depression takes longer to respond to treatment than late-onset single-episode depression and is more strongly associated with cognitive and functional impairment. Further study of biological, neuropsychologic, and psychosocial correlates of late-onset, recurrent depression is needed.

Accelerating symptom-reduction in late-life depression: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of sleep deprivation.

OBJECTIVE: Authors tested the hypothesis that one night of total sleep deprivation (TSD) would accelerate antidepressant response to paroxetine, as compared with TSD+placebo (PBO) and paroxetine-alone, in late-life major depression. METHODS: Eighty elderly outpatients with current episodes of non-psychotic, non-bipolar major depression were randomly assigned to one of three treatment conditions: TSD+paroxetine (N = 27), TSD + PBO (N = 27), and paroxetine-only (N = 26). Primary outcome was percentage of subjects in each condition who demonstrated early response (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores [Ham-D: 17-item] of < or = 10) or remission (score of < or = 7) on Day 14. RESULTS: Response rates after 14 days were 22% in subjects randomly assigned to the TSD + paroxetine condition, 41% in TSD + PBO, and 46% in paroxetine alone. Remission rates after 14 days were 11% in TSD+paroxetine, 22% in TSD + PBO, and 38% in paroxetine. After adjusting for baseline depression severity, there were no statistically significant differences in response or remission rates. CONCLUSION: Contrary to the study hypothesis, one night of total sleep deprivation did not accelerate onset of antidepressant response to paroxetine pharmacotherapy of late-life depression. The data suggest, rather, that the two interventions might have counteracted each other.

A pilot study of standardized treatment in geriatric bipolar disorder.

OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to determine the feasibility of treating elderly adults with bipolar disorder under standardized-treatment conditions. METHODS: Thirty-one patients age 60 and older with bipolar disorder were treated in standardized pathways. Mood state was checked at each study visit with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 item (Ham-D-17) and the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). RESULTS: Defining "well days" as both Ham-D and YMRS scores of

Risk factors for falls during treatment of late-life depression.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have found that antidepressant medications are associated with an increased risk of falling in elderly persons. However, little is known about the prevention of falls during treatment for depression in elderly persons. This study evaluated the time course and potential risk factors for falls in a treatment protocol for late-life depression to identify specific at-risk periods and risk factors for falls in this population. METHOD: One hundred four subjects aged 69 years and over were treated in a protocolized manner using paroxetine and interpersonal psychotherapy. Those who did not respond received augmentation therapy with bupropion, nortriptyline, or lithium. Subjects were assessed at baseline and weekly during treatment; demographic and clinical characteristics of those who experienced a fall during treatment were compared with those who did not fall. Cox proportional hazards models were used to define risk factors for falls in univariate and multivariate models. RESULTS: During a mean of 21 weeks of treatment, 40 subjects (38%) fell. About half (53%) of the subjects fell during the first 6 weeks of treatment. In the multivariate model, memory impairment and orthostatic changes in blood pressure during treatment were risk factors for falling. Additionally, augmentation with bupropion appeared to be a risk factor for falls in univariate analysis, but this result is preliminary due to the small number of subjects who took bupropion. CONCLUSION: Increased monitoring for falls is warranted during the acute treatment of late-life depression. When treating such patients, clinicians should be especially watchful of those with memory impairments or those who develop orthostatic blood pressure changes; orthostatic blood pressure should be measured throughout acute treatment. Additionally, augmenting paroxetine with bupropion may also increase the risk of falls, and this medication combination should be used with caution in elderly patients.

Nortriptyline Side Effects During Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Maintenance Therapy in Older Depressed Patients.

The authors assessed the severity of nortriptyline side effects in older patients with major depression during 12 months of double-blind therapy. Data were from 40 patients completing 1 year of maintenance therapy: 26 were on nortriptyline and 14 were on placebo. The authors detected significant time-by-treatment interactions for various side effects (all greater in treated patients), but not for overall side effects score. Clinically, these differences were judged to be minor and correctable. On the other hand, total side effect scores, physical tiredness, and subjective sleep disturbance covaried significantly with Hamilton Depression scores regardless of treatment assignment. Somatic worry, tiredness, and sleep complaints appeared to reflect residual depression rather than treatment assignment.