Peer navigation for smoking cessation in people with HIV who smoke: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: People with HIV (PWH) cite smoking within their social networks as a barrier to quitting. We examined the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a tailored intervention, Peer Navigation Social Support for Smoking cessation (PNSS-S), designed specifically for PWH who smoke. METHODS: We randomized 64 PWH who smoked (mean age 54.5 years; 41% female) to PNSS-S or standard care (SC). After meeting with a clinic nurse to discuss quitting strategies and pharmacotherapy, the PNSS-S group received 12 weekly phone calls from a trained HIV peer navigator (PN), who provided smoking cessation counseling and social support for quitting. Outcomes were assessed at 12- and 24-weeks. RESULTS: Sixty-two percent of participants indicated interest in quitting at baseline. PN utilization was high with a mean number of weekly calls completed of 8.9 (SD 3.1), demonstrating excellent feasibility. Higher treatment satisfaction scores (29.1 [SD 3.0]) were reported in PNSS-S, compared to control (25.8 [SD 4.1], t = -3.39, d = 0.89, p = .001). Notably, positive social support for quitting increased significantly from baseline to week 12 in PNSS-S (17.4 [SD 11.4] to 25.1 [SD 12.2], p = .01), whereas SC showed no significant change (t = 1.11, df 29, p = .24). At week 24, 5 (16.6%) participants in PNSS-S and 3 (8.8%) in SC endorsed 7-day point prevalence smoking abstinence: OR=2.05 95% CI=[0.45-10.88]. CONCLUSIONS: Peer-based smoking cessation counseling increased the odds of abstinence and significantly increased social support for quitting. Further study is warranted. IMPLICATIONS: Cross training HIV peer navigators to address smoking cessation may be a cost-effective approach, as it utilizes existing HIV clinic-based resources. By strengthening social support and providing a peer-based approach, this intervention may help reduce the burden of tobacco-related health issues in this population, ultimately contributing to better overall health and longevity for PWH. Further research is needed to refine and expand upon these findings.

Development of an Electronic Health Record Self-Referral Tool for Lung Cancer Screening: One-Group Posttest Study.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 14 million individuals in the United States are eligible for lung cancer screening (LCS), but only 5.8% completed screening in 2021. Given the low uptake despite the potential great health benefit of LCS, interventions aimed at increasing uptake are warranted. The use of a patient-facing electronic health record (EHR) patient portal direct messaging tool offers a new opportunity to both engage eligible patients in preventative screening and provide a unique referral pathway for tobacco treatment. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to develop and pilot an EHR patient-facing self-referral tool for an established LCS program in an academic medical center. METHODS: Guided by constructs of the Health Belief Model associated with LCS uptake (eg, knowledge and self-efficacy), formative development of an EHR-delivered engagement message, infographic, and self-referring survey was conducted. The survey submits eligible self-reported patient information to a scheduler for the LCS program. The materials were pretested using an interviewer-administered mixed methods survey captured through venue-day-time sampling in 5 network-affiliated pulmonology clinics. Materials were then integrated into the secure patient messaging feature in the EHR system. Next, a one-group posttest quality improvement pilot test was conducted. RESULTS: A total of 17 individuals presenting for lung screening shared-decision visits completed the pretest survey. More than half were newly referred for LCS (n=10, 60%), and the remaining were returning patients. When asked if they would use a self-referring tool through their EHR messaging portal, 94% (n=16) reported yes. In it, 15 participants provided oral feedback that led to refinement in the tool and infographic prior to pilot-testing. When the initial application of the tool was sent to a convenience sample of 150 random patients, 13% (n=20) opened the self-referring survey. Of the 20 who completed the pilot survey, 45% (n=9) were eligible for LCS based on self-reported smoking data. A total of 3 self-referring individuals scheduled an LCS. CONCLUSIONS: Pretest and initial application data suggest this tool is a positive stimulus to trigger the decision-making process to engage in a self-referral process to LCS among eligible patients. This self-referral tool may increase the number of patients engaging in LCS and could also be used to aid in self-referral to other preventative health screenings. This tool has implications for clinical practice. Tobacco treatment clinical services or health care systems should consider using EHR messaging for LCS self-referral. This approach may be cost-effective to improve LCS engagement and uptake. Additional referral pathways could be built into this EHR tool to not only refer patients who currently smoke to LCS but also simultaneously trigger a referral to clinical tobacco treatment.

Using adult learning characteristics and the humanities to teach undergraduate healthcare students about social determinants of health.

Authors used an andragogy framework to help undergraduate allied health students better understand social determinants of health (SDOH) using a photo essay assignment. The study examined students' perceptions of SDOH in various communities, description of health outcomes associated with their chosen SDOH, and lessons learned and suggestions to improve the assignment for future cohorts. Data were extracted from photo essays from 2019-2021 and entered in Microsoft Excel and Word for data analysis after course completion. Conventional qualitative content analysis was used to analyze student evaluation data from open-ended questions. Data were extracted from 53 student essays from 2019 to 2021. Most photo essays described communities in South Carolina (n = 42, 79.2%), urban areas (n = 37, 69.8%), or intermediary SDOH (75.5%). Several themes emerged concerning lessons learned (awareness and empathy are key to addressing SDOH), health equity (collaboration is necessary to provide resources, especially for underserved populations), and constructive feedback for the instructor (more time to discuss SDOH and assignment with peers and instructor). Faculty must work with students to think about more upstream factors like policy and cultural and societal values. Collecting evaluation data, specifically lessons learned and constructive feedback for faculty, can help faculty continuously improve course topics and assignments. Following a transparency framework can support student success and help faculty become effective leaders in the classroom while teaching subjects like SDOH and social justice.