Updating a Healthcare System-wide Clinical Pathway for Managing Chest Pain and Acute Coronary Syndromes.

Clinical pathways are useful tools for conveying and reinforcing best practices to standardize care and optimize patient outcomes across myriad conditions. The NewYork-Presbyterian Healthcare System has utilized a clinical chest pain pathway for more than 20 years to facilitate the timely recognition and management of patients presenting with chest pain syndromes and acute coronary syndromes. This chest pain pathway is regularly updated by an expanding group of key stakeholders, which has extended from the Columbia University Irving Medical Center to encompass the entire regional healthcare system, which includes 8 hospitals. In this 2023 update of the NewYork-Presbyterian clinical chest pain pathway, we present the key changes to the healthcare system-wide clinical chest pain pathway.

Twenty Years of an Institutional Chest Pain Pathway: What's Come and What's Yet to Come.

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remain one of the leading causes of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the United States and around the world. Because of the acute nature of ACS presentations, timely identification, risk stratification, and intervention are of the utmost importance. Twenty years ago, we published the first iteration of our institutional chest pain clinical pathway in this journal, which separated patients presenting with chest pain into one of the 4 levels of decreasing acuity, with associated actions and interventions for providers based on the level. This chest pain clinical pathway has undergone regular review and updates under a collaborative team of cardiologists, emergency department physicians, cardiac nurse practitioners, and other associated stakeholders in the treatment of patients presenting with chest pain. This review will discuss the key changes that our institutional chest pain algorithm has undergone over the last 2 decades and what the future holds for chest pain algorithms.

An Updated Healthcare System-Wide Clinical Pathway for Managing Patients With Chest Pain and Acute Coronary Syndromes.

Clinical pathways reinforce best practices and help healthcare institutions standardize care delivery. The NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center has used such a pathway for the management of patients with chest pain and acute coronary syndromes for almost 2 decades. A multidisciplinary panel of stakeholders serially updates the algorithm according to new data and recently published guidelines. Herein, we present the 2019 version of the clinical pathway. We explain the rationale for changes to the algorithm and describe our experience expanding the pathway to all the 8 affiliated institutions within the NewYork Presbyterian healthcare system.

An Updated Protocol for Evaluating Chest Pain and Managing Acute Coronary Syndromes.

Clinical pathways can optimize care both across and within institutions, but regular updates to these pathways based on new clinical trials, professional guidelines, and Food and Drug Administration approvals are essential. Herein we describe the most recent revisions to the New York-Presbyterian Hospital (Columbia University Medical Center and Weill Cornell Medical Center) clinical pathway for acute coronary syndromes and chest pain, which incorporates novel data regarding the timing and administration of P2Y12 inhibition (including the intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor cangrelor) and the appropriateness of prolonged (>1 year) dual antiplatelet therapy for the secondary prevention of ischemic events.

Radiation dose and prognosis of ultra-low-dose stress-first myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients with chest pain using a high-efficiency camera.

UNLABELLED: Although SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) provides valuable information about patients with chest pain, there is growing concern regarding its radiation burden and lengthy duration. New high-efficiency (HE) cameras and stress-first protocols both offer the potential to markedly reduce radiation. No previous study has assessed outcomes and radiation doses of patients undergoing MPI on an HE-SPECT camera using an ultra-low-dose stress-first protocol. METHODS: One hundred patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain who were candidates for stress-first MPI underwent injection of approximately 185 MBq (5 mCi) of (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin at peak stress, followed by supine and prone imaging on an HE-SPECT camera. Same-day rest imaging was performed on patients with any abnormality on imaging after stress. Radiation effective dose was calculated from administered and residual activities. Patients were contacted 3 mo after discharge, and electronic records were accessed to evaluate the need for reevaluation for chest pain, additional imaging, or cardiac events. RESULTS: Stress-only imaging was performed in 69 patients, for whom radiation effective dose averaged 0.99 mSv and study duration, 117 min. Radiation dose averaged 2.22 mSv over all patients. At 3 mo, 96 patients were free of major adverse cardiac events, repeat hospital chest pain evaluation, and repeat imaging or stress testing. One year after MPI and hospital discharge, all patients were living and without acute coronary syndrome. CONCLUSION: HE-SPECT stress-only imaging can be performed in more than two thirds of chest pain patients without a high pretest probability of a stress perfusion defect, with excellent prognosis, a radiation dose averaging 1 mSv, and a test duration of less than 2 h.

Updating an institutional chest pain algorithm: incorporating new evidence on emerging pharmacotherapy.

Clinical treatment pathways are useful to ensure that evidence-based medicine is consistently applied in hospital systems and have been shown to improve patient outcomes. Such pathways need to be regularly updated and revised by incorporating new evidence from clinical trials to ensure optimal clinical care. In 2011, we published the Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital - Clinical Pathways for Acute Coronary Syndromes and Chest Pain. This algorithm includes primary percutaneous coronary intervention for all patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and an early invasive approach for patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Since our last chest pain algorithm update, the novel antiplatelet agent ticagrelor has been introduced in the United States, resulting in an important revision of our acute coronary syndrome clinical pathways. Herein, we present our updated chest pain algorithm and provide rationale for the changes that we have made to our protocol.

Updating the chest pain algorithm: incorporating new evidence on emerging antiplatelet agents.

In 2008, we published our chest pain protocol for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and acute myocardial infarction. Our algorithm was specifically designed for our institution, which includes primary percutaneous intervention (PCI) for all ST-elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs) and a preferred invasive approach for non-STEMIs. Since 2008, there have been changes in the adjunctive pharmacotherapeutic armamentarium for PCI in both the STEMI and non-STEMI ACS context. In particular, recent data on the novel antiplatelet agent prasugrel, dosing of clopidogrel after PCI, and interactions with clopidogrel and other medicines and substrates, which can lead to decreased platelet response to clopidogrel, have led us to update our ACS clinical pathway. We present our updated chest pain algorithm with a brief review of the rapidly evolving changes in adjunctive pharmacotherapy for PCI, and provide rationale for the changes that we have made to our institutional protocol. Clinical pathways need to be regularly updated and revised by incorporating new evidence from clinical trials to ensure optimal clinical care.

Impact of thienopyridine administration prior to primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction.

The impact of thienopyridine administration prior to primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has not been well studied. We therefore examined the database from the prospective, multicenter, controlled CADILLAC trial in which 1,036 patients were randomized to bare metal stenting with or without abciximab to determine whether patients who received a thienopyridine prior to bare metal stenting in AMI had superior clinical outcomes. Per operator discretion, 659 patients (63.6%; Th+) received either a 500 mg ticlopidine loading dose (n = 623) or a 300 mg clopidogrel loading dose (n = 40), while 377 patients (36.4%; Th-) received no thienopyridine prior to stent implantation. Baseline and procedural characteristics of the two groups, including abciximab use (52.5% vs 52.8%, P = 0.93) were well matched. Th+ compared to Th- patients had lower rates of core lab assessed TIMI 0/1 flow postprocedure (0.8% vs 2.7%, P = 0.01). Th+ compared to Th- patients also had significantly reduced in-hospital and 30-day rates of ischemic target vessel revascularization (TVR) (1.1% vs 3.2%, P = 0.01 and 1.5% vs 3.8%, P = 0.02, respectively) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (2.7% vs 5.8%, P = 0.01 and 4.0% vs 6.9%, P = 0.03, respectively), results that remained significant after covariate adjustment. In conclusion, in this large prospective, controlled trial, patients receiving a thienopyridine prior to primary stenting in AMI were less likely to have TIMI 0/1 flow postprocedure and experienced reduced in-hospital and 30-day rates of ischemic TVR and MACE compared to those not administered a thienopyridine prior to stent implantation.

Updating the chest pain algorithm: incorporating new evidence.

In 2003, we published our chest pain protocol for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) and acute myocardial infarction. Our algorithm was specifically designed for our institution, which was primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for all ST-elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs) and a preferred invasive approach for non-STEMIs. Since 2003, there have been numerous changes in the adjunctive pharmacotherapeutic armamentarium for PCI in both the STEMI and non-STEMI ACS context. We present our updated chest pain algorithm with a brief review of the rapidly evolving changes in adjunctive pharmacotherapy for PCI and provide a rationale for the changes that we have made to our institutional protocol. Clinical pathways need to be consistently updated and revises by incorporating new evidence from clinical trials in order to maintain clinical relevance.

Determinants of left ventricular thrombus formation after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for anterior wall myocardial infarction.

Previous studies have reported that left ventricular (LV) thrombus is a complication in 10-56% of ST-segment elevation acute anterior wall myocardial infarctions (AWMI). Data suggest that changes in acute myocardial infarction management such as early anticoagulation, thrombolysis, and most recently, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), may decrease thrombus occurrence. Early time to reperfusion has been shown to decrease mortality and improve LV function recovery. To determine if door-to-balloon time (DTBT) affects the incidence of LV thrombus, we retrospectively analyzed data on 43 consecutive patients who underwent successful PCI of a primary acute ST-segment elevation AWMI. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed for detecting LV thrombus and measuring LV ejection fraction (EF) within 5 days on all patients (average time: 2.17 days post event). Nineteen patients underwent PCI within 2 h of arrival to the Emergency Department (Group A, average 88 min) and 24 patients underwent PCI with DTBT of more than 2 h (Group B, average 193 min). Clinically significant LV thrombus was detected in 35% of all patients. The incidence of LV thrombus formation in Group A was not significantly different from that in Group B (42.1% vs. 29.0%, respectively; P = 0.52). The risk of LV thrombus was independent of in-hospital anticoagulation and medical management, peak enzyme levels, and LVEF but did relate to age (odds ratio = 1.96, 95% CI 1.03-3.73, P = 0.04 per decade). No embolic events in hospital were observed (average hospital stay 9.2 days). We conclude that the incidence of LV thrombus remains high despite PCI. Also, we find that DTBT in patients presenting with an ST-segment elevation AWMI does not affect the incidence of LV thrombus formation. Increased age, however, does appear to increase the risk of LV thrombus development.

A rapid-response alphanumeric paging design decreases door-to-balloon times in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction.

INTRODUCTION: In acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), rapid reperfusion of the infarcted artery improves cardiovascular outcomes; however, many hospitals have difficulty achieving recommended times. We hypothesized that a Rapid-Response Alphanumeric Paging Design (RAPiD) would reduce door-to-balloon time for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in STEMI. METHODS: A chest pain algorithm and interdisciplinary team was established in December 2000. In August 2002, RAPiD was instituted to transmit the diagnosis and location of a STEMI to the chest pain team through a speed-dial button. All patients presenting to our emergency department from February 2002 through July 2003 with STEMI were included. Exclusion criteria included lack of chest pain, cardiopulmonary arrest before PCI, and catheterization or PCI not performed. Outside-referral STEMI, in-patient STEMI, and failed thrombolysis patients were excluded. Data was obtained from medical records. Log transform of door-to-balloon (DTB) times was performed. RESULTS: Forty-seven events satisfied inclusion and exclusion criteria with 32 occurring after RAPiD (post-RAPiD). Fifteen events occurred during on-hours (8 am to 7 pm on weekdays). Mean untransformed DTB times pre- and post-RAPiD were 162 +/- 137 (standard deviation) minutes and 112 +/- 41 minutes. The main effects analysis of variance model showed a significant reduction in post-RAPiD DTB time (P = 0.03) with a mean reduction of 26% during off-hours and 20% during on-hours. The post-RAPiD estimate of mean DTB time, derived from the antilog of the log transform, was 96.7 minutes (95% confidence interval, 83.7-111.7). CONCLUSIONS: The institution of RAPiD in a hospital with a preexisting chest pain algorithm significantly decreases DTB times so as to satisfy current ACC/AHA guidelines.